Unfortunately, she is our problem and we need to deal with her. Hopefully she is tried for the crimes, though I'd imagine evidence will be hard to come by. One thing I'd maintain though: I wouldn't waste a bead of sweat in getting her back. She is allowed but will need to make her way to our Turkish Embassy or whatever to arrange it, don't be sending in troops or other staff to shepherd her home.
not making any excuses for her, but a) she was a child, the age group in which you are most likely to be vulnerable/easily influenced and b) she doesn't seem very bright when she talks, meaning she was probably very easy to influence, the Tories basically used the situation to their advantage pre general election by looking strong and, well er, conservative, knowing it would lead to this situation late on, basically they've played a blinder and don't really care whether she comes back or not, in the eyes of Joe Public they done their best.
Not sure why she would want to come back even if family are here, will affect her for the rest of her life, stigmatised, employability etc, better off starting anew somewhere where publicity of her case was bare minimal.
not making any excuses for her, but a) she was a child, the age group in which you are most likely to be vulnerable/easily influenced and b) she doesn't seem very bright when she talks, meaning she was probably very easy to influence, the Tories basi
No you need to protect the young from the nutters, she might now be able to stem the tide if she has matured and become enlightened in the traditional way...s..
No you need to protect the young from the nutters, she might now be able to stem the tide if she has matured and become enlightened in the traditional way...s..
Does anybody know who is paying her legal bills? Only two possibilities I can see, either the lawyers are doing it pro bono (why?) or the British taxpayer is paying (why?).
Does anybody know who is paying her legal bills? Only two possibilities I can see, either the lawyers are doing it pro bono (why?) or the British taxpayer is paying (why?).
It is the first responsibility of government in a democratic society to protect and safeguard the lives of its citizens. That is where the public interest lies. It is essential to the preservation of democracy, and it is the duty of the court to do all it can to respect and uphold that principle.
It is the first responsibility of government in a democratic society to protect and safeguard the lives of its citizens. That is where the public interest lies. It is essential to the preservation of democracy, and it is the duty of the court to do a
15 year old not responsible for joining Isis. 12 year old responsible for racist twatter. 10 year old require gender reassignment.
Nope let's leave this to Chas and Dave.
15 year old not responsible for joining Isis.12 year old responsible for racist twatter.10 year old require gender reassignment.Nope let's leave this to Chas and Dave.
seems there are very underhanded people on here who report threads none stop ,sad individuals
with probably no other interest in life other than posting on here .
I have seen 5 or 6 such threads all by different users when the first post has been removed .
In reply to porcupine I would leave her where she is ,must be serious amounts of money already
spent ,can only be tax payers money , I thought she was a dual national .
seems there are very underhanded people on here who report threads none stop ,sad individuals with probably no other interest in life other than posting on here .I have seen 5 or 6 such threads all by different users when the first post has been remo
In reply to porcupine I would leave her where she is ,must be serious amounts of money already
spent ,can only be tax payers money , I thought she was a dual national .
That's half the problem. Too many people don't know what they are talking about.
In reply to porcupine I would leave her where she is ,must be serious amounts of money alreadyspent ,can only be tax payers money , I thought she was a dual national .That's half the problem. Too many people don't know what they are talking about.
The Government should not be able to remove citizenship from her. If they can do that then they can remove it from anyone.
Should bring her back and charge her with joining a terrorist group or whatever.
The Government should not be able to remove citizenship from her. If they can do that then they can remove it from anyone.Should bring her back and charge her with joining a terrorist group or whatever.
I find it odd, given reports of what she is supposed to have done, that she is not up on trial already.
I guess the witnesses are long gone. Perhaps.
Coming back to UK to attempt to regain her citizenship must be a desperate decision.
As she was just a kid when electing to leave UK I suppose they will treat her with more compassion than she has ever shown.
I guess that's her hope,...
I find it odd, given reports of what she is supposed to have done, thatshe is not up on trial already. I guess the witnesses are long gone. Perhaps. Coming back to UK to attempt to regain her citizenship must be a desperatedecision.As she was just a
She may be able to apply for Bangladeshi citizenship, though I suspect they may not look on her request favourably. She's British. The government know this and are just playing to the gallery. Just accept it and work on gathering evidence for her trial.
She may be able to apply for Bangladeshi citizenship, though I suspect they may not look on her request favourably. She's British. The government know this and are just playing to the gallery. Just accept it and work on gathering evidence for her tri