|
By:
and can you explain why? I don't understand, commentary and many voices within the Commons said it was certain to be defeated by a wide margin
|
|
By:
mrs may thinks she can try again with no deal off table and an extension but erg/dodds have already tabled a motion to delay to may 22
but for the eu to grant that to may and erg/dodds it means EU opening up withdrawl bill and moving more on the backstop,that would be a huge climdown for EU and throwing Dublin under the bus, think they,ll only offer a deal on soft/customs Brexit,2nd reff,gen e, don't think they,ll offer an extension of 21 months say just so may can try and blackmail mp,s and resurrect her deal for a 3rd time, [ either ] |
|
By:
It's because the motion is worded "this House declines to approve leaving the European Union without a withdrawal agreement." So the House will agree with the motion, hence "yes." Now its 1.07.
|
|
By:
seems BBC have a different understanding
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-46393399 |
|
By:
No way are they letting you leave its as simple as that
They have cheated, backstabbed and bulls****** their way to a remain Disgusting bunch of s**** |
|
By:
bonkers market, Alan.
![]() |
|
By:
Surely you can back NO leave by 29th at 1.15 and lay 1.04 on the no deal motion.
Just no liquidity |
|
By:
|
|
By:
Yes.
|
|
By:
Any 1 of the 27 member states could refuse in fact.
|
|
By:
let's hope so!! So if just one member refuses we go out on 29th?
|
|
By:
Maybe somebody with a bit of cash needs to bribe one of the smaller countries to let us leave by refusing the extension.
|
|
By:
The general consensus is they will grant us an extension of like 8 weeks to do who knows what.
|
|
By:
if just one refuses extension then you cant have it, the malthouse compromise allows free movement doesnt it, one of the main reasons for leaving the eu
|
|
By:
The Malthouse Compromise Plan B talks about a transition period after no deal for Britain to get ready, something already flat out rejected by the EU. There is no transition period without an agreement.
|
|
By:
just another unicorn ,commons repeatedly voting for things the EU wont allow,meanwhile in blighty mays keeps refusing to offer legaly binding votes on things that may get a majority in the commons,
a nano second after boris mentioned basically the malthouse compromise in the commons during yesterdays debate ,barnier who,s listening to every word went on twitter to say forget it no chance whats really getting my goat is the likes of zhwani on newsnight last night,not so cleverly on news today blaming labour, with a mixture of 75 tory remainers, erg and dup,theres no way any tory including mrs may wanted that vote won last night on labour votes,we,d now be talking no confidence votes,leadership battles,GE,s, complete lying bluffers |
|
By:
why do the media always say all 27 countries have to agree on anything ? everyone knows they'll all fall into line with whatever germany wants. they know where their bread's buttered
|
|
By:
if mrs may brings her deal back again the question she needs to answer or be asked in the commons is will she accept her deal going through
without the dup and 20 hardline erg voting for it said a million times before but as labour are in disarray and need torys to be in equal disarray to have a chance,why don't labour throw a dup fox into a tory henhouse and vote the deal through it will almost certainly get them the GE threy say they want and split the tory party |
|
By:
I guess because they have calculated Labour would not win a majority and would have to take charge of Brexit. It they then refused to stop freedom of movement they would be out of power forever as they would not be able to win outside London again.
|
|
By:
Who would be winning the Labour heartlands then?
|
|
By:
It's bizarre that some folks on here think all labour remain voters outside of London are now going to vote conservative.
|
|
By:
I don't buy for a second there's any major move of Labour leave voters to Conservative or anywhere full stop either.
|
|
By:
Well, who would win " outside of London" and particularly in the north, if not labour?
|
|
By:
what is going on now mps pulling their own amendments???shambolic to say the least
|
|
By:
politicspunter
13 Mar 19 15:10 Joined: 20 Mar 18 | Topic/replies: 3,046 | Blogger: politicspunter's blog It's bizarre that some folks on here think all labour remain voters outside of London are now going to vote conservative. ^ No one is suggesting that. |
|
By:
Well, what exactly are you suggesting?
|
|
By:
they've already lost 3 mp,s to independent group,without the dup onside theres no government
|
|
By:
How long can we go on with this farcical situation? A general election may be the only option shortly.
|
|
By:
still no attempt at a compromise!
ammendments are often not moved, because they are tabled as a device or threat. once the mover is content they get what they want from the vote there becomes no point in advancing the ammendment to a vote. |
|
By:
May has no majority that's been obvious for a long time
She should be forced to leave, and if she doesn't they should all walk out ffs |
|
By:
MPs just voted to take no deal off the table.
Just shows how clueless they are. Have they ever done a real job in their lives? |
|
By:
Negotiation over.
Whatever the EU wants we have to agree to now. Although this is not law thank goodness. |
|
By:
I think that this will inevitably lead to revoking article 50 as the EU will never offer an acceptable deal after that.
|
|
By:
No deal finished,nice.
![]() |
|
By:
Non-binding.
|