|
By:
More drivel
|
|
By:
the guardian will have manipulated the figures, they will not be prepared to let people know the truth, and that is closer to my estimate than their bogus lies
|
|
By:
Anxious are you disputing the figures 1.6m/1m?
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
I was replying to lfc
|
|
By:
its very simple the guardian have an agenda, and that is to cover up the facts so as nothing changes
that means they will never say that 90% of immigrants vote labour I can assure you they will have manipulated their survey |
|
By:
anyone who thinks those are the correct figures from the guardian is very naïve
|
|
By:
Anxious,
Do you just selectively reply or do you look at everything on the thread? For instance do you agree that 67% of black people vote Labour whereas 21% vote Tory? |
|
By:
Maybe 60-40 i would say is nearer , why are you bothered anyway every vote counts as 1 as far as i know
|
|
By:
no one sensible, not even anxious would believe that
|
|
By:
Most Cities have higher Immigrant populations this is true for over 70 years
|
|
By:
sorry he does
![]() |
|
By:
In Manchester we had large afro- Caribbean , Irish and Jewish areas in the 60s and 70s
|
|
By:
neither here nor there anxious, we are merely interested in do they vote tory or labour
|
|
By:
anxious
06 May 18 17:41 Joined: 14 May 15 | Topic/replies: 22,134 | Blogger: anxious's blog Most Cities have higher Immigrant populations this is true for over 70 years ^ London 2001 White: British 4,287,861 (59.79% of London population) London 2011 White: British 3,669,284 (44.89% of London population) London 2018? Things have changed a lot very quickly. |
|
By:
Most Mancunians are anti -tory whatever their colour or creed im glad to say
![]() |
|
By:
Manchester only 7% foreign born.
|
|
By:
No i think its higher than that
|
|
By:
In the last few years quite a lot of Eastern Europeans have arrived
|
|
By:
That was 2005 figures. So probably more now.
|
|
By:
http://www.britishfuture.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Mind-the-gap-report-2017.pdf
|
|
By:
Must be loads of micks in Manchester.
|
|
By:
I don't post often nowadays, mostly because of attitudes that are typical on this thread. Some folks on here will never win at political betting as they are blinkered in their opinions.
Regarding the Barnet council, here was my analysis... There are 63 council seats in Barnet made up of 21 wards each returning 3 councillors. Before the election on Thursday, Conservatives had 32, Labour 30 and LibDem 1. Nine of the wards were solid tory virtually guaranteed to return 27 councillors, 7 of the wards were solid Labour guaranteed to return 21 councillors. That left five wards in play.. Brunswick Park-2 lab, 1 con.-Estimate 1 con minimum. Childs Hill- 2 con, 1 Libdem- Estimate 2 con minimum. East Barnet- 3 Lab- 3 lab-Estimate 1 con minimum. Hale- 2 con 1 lab- estimate 2 con minimum. West Hendon- 3 lab- estimate 1 con minimum. So I estimated that the conservatives would win a total of no less than 34 seats. You could have knocked me down with a feather when Ladbrokes/coral priced it as 1/8 Labour, 6/1 Con. I was limited to £50 max con online so then spent the next couple of days betting in shops in my area and beyond. The mad thing on the night was that even when the tories won the only Labour seat in Hale, meaning it was virtually impossible for Labour to win, folks were still betting Labour at odds on here and con were available at 3.1!! Anyway, it was a very good night and it never ceases to amaze me why folks back no hopers (like labour in Bexley or Conservative in Hammersmith) as it is simply throwing money away irrespective of their price. |
|
By:
Stop aftertiming and virtue signalling meadow,it doesn't become you.
|
|
By:
flush, it wasn't just me that thought that 1/8 labour quote was nuts, it was mentioned on here on at least two different threads (not by me though!).
|
|
By:
Virtue signalling lol how pathetic again from flasher the tory fanboy
|
|
By:
I know it was fairly obvious from the week before the tuppeny chews were going to desert Labour. Anxious you seem anxious is it pmt or just chronic inadequacy?
|
|
By:
Virtue signalling lol how pathetic again from flasher the tory fanboy
Laughable anx,I recall flush being Labour several years ago,he may have a brain and think for himself but he is certainly no tory fanboy ! |
|
By:
Correct flossy ,
|
|
By:
some of the policies are very good but nuclear and immigration are his hugely weak areas - I think corbyn would try to act in the interest of the general public but there are too many other interests that would deny it
|
|
By:
ps he never expected to become the leader - he has somewhat fked up the regular careerist, place seeking bureaucratic nature of what the suits had turned the party into. But does anyone think Momentum is the future which seeks to represent the nation?
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
Somehow that makes me a labour supporter!
|
|
By:
Not sure what the 1/8 has got to do with my point.
|