Jul 21, 2016 -- 7:47AM, anxious wrote:
Can anybody on here explain to the difference between New Labour and the Conservative Party ?
One looks red and the other looks blue.
Jul 26, 2016 -- 6:35AM, enpassant wrote:
mafeking: they would have to resign and fight by-elections under some guise. Then we would really see the lay of the land and all the media push to tell us Corbyn is not popular to the electorate is true or pure propaganda.
No they wouldn't. MP's are elected until the dissolution of Parliament a defection does not need a by-election.
Jul 27, 2016 -- 4:38PM, grappler wrote:
correct. he won 60% of the votes cast by other fools. the rump of the labour party has always harboured these idiots, but now one of their own has secured the glittering prize, soon to be a poisoned chalice. the same hate-filled d1ckheads that formed militant in the 80s form momentum now. i know several of them. one very prominent one comes into my battlecruiser. she means well, but is crackers. the others are consumed by misplaced loathing and resentment, and will have no disagreement.
Anyone who has had anything to do with the Labour Party since the 1980s will accept this analysis.
The purists leading the naïve. The purists will think it's a good day's work done (ironic as they've probably never really worked a day in their lives)that the party has now only real socialists. That it will only have 180 seats matters not a jot.
If I was a member I'd be up for a split, best to divorce now than watch it fester for a few more years to come, and waste those years as well.
Broad range of anti tory parties and interests fighting for PR then?
Jul 28, 2016 -- 12:59PM, anxious wrote:
Billy summer 2015 - Corbyn a definite lay a gift -
It was. Although you won't understand that.