Feb 28, 2012 -- 9:22AM, sibaroni wrote:
After the case, the bans are lifted.
Feb 28, 2012 -- 9:36AM, sibaroni wrote:
Perhaps this provides a reason:The trial of members of an alleged paedophile ring, taking place at Liverpool Crown Court, may be adjourned following violence as EDL and BNP members protested outside the court on Monday. Two barristers have reportedly quit the case after they were attacked outside the courtrooms. It is currently unclear who the perpetrators of the attack on the barristers were. http://www.blottr.com/uk/breaking-news/edlbnp-violence-adjourns-paedophile-r...
zzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzz zzz z zzzzz
Clutching at straw sib. Stop it now.
Look at the date - Thu 9 February 2012 on your link.
The trial was running and reported by the BBC
21 February 2012 Last updated at 19:27 GMT
Feb 28, 2012 -- 10:40AM, blackburn1 wrote:
I'll tell you what I believe sib, if BNP and EDL were outside the court reporters and cameras would have been too. If they had beaten up two defence lawyers it would be headlines on the front page of every newspaper, quite rightly.I dont believe a word of it and nor should you. It shows you clutching at straws citing an obscure website which says "reportedly" and "unclear".
Blackie the cameras were there. You can see big cameras and two man TV crews. It is on the youtube uploads.
Feb 28, 2012 -- 10:44AM, sibaroni wrote:
My point, six guns, which went way over your head, was that there is nothing unique to any ethnic group about child abuse.
Feb 28, 2012 -- 11:04AM, moisok wrote:
diversion wind up excellent
Pitiful really isn't it.
Key words to match with another ethnic group to make this other than unique.
GANG RAPE - GROOMING - UNDER AGE GIRLS - EPIDEMIC
Link this to another racial group and I will accept this is not unique.
Feb 28, 2012 -- 5:18PM, sibaroni wrote:
They are exploiting under age girls but they are not paedophilesHave a word with yourself.And if it isn't your word, why use it. It is plainly aimed at finding your desired results.Again, not for your benefit - you are gone. Child abuse is child abuse, all types of people do it. Sadly.
You just expose your ignorance here sib.
Paedophilia is an attraction to pre-pubescent children, not anyone under the age of 18 or 16 or same legally defined age limit.
I explained that - go look it up.
I stated these men are not operating in that age range. There is mention of an 11 year old but I saw somewhere that a judge had gone easy on a defendant as an 11-year-old looked 14 and was "willing." (Not my words)
I do not know what her level of physical maturity was to be specific to that child.
As you know the legal definition of a child goes from 0 to the second before the 18th birthday. Children are not all the same and those who prey on them are not all the same because of this huge spectrum.
The group your search picked out would be the paedophiles and a lot sharing images/videos.
I am unclear what word it is I am having with myself.
What is my desired result?
Certainly not what you would twist it into.
The word paedophile is being used by most of the media and the thread. I was illustrating how you were plain wrong lumping this section of child abuse with another section as if they were the same.
Child sex abuse is not all the same as I said.
It is all wrong but it is not all the same.
The psychology and pathopsychology of child abuse is not uniform amongst its perpetrators.
If you aim to lump it all into one pot you are failing to understand its details.
The causes and solutions for the Asian gang rapes are not the same as the paedophile rings you discovered.
In the law there is a law and it is broken and it is all the same. It is very black and white.
You are gone not me.