Utterly contrived garbbage

I'm quitting online poker after seeing this.

heres one of i saw, i had folded ofcourse.

Dealing pocket cards
Dealing to manxy_x: [As, 7c]
manxy_x folds
hopeavalo folds
praiadefaro folds
anikanos calls 80
siesopillas calls 40
Adrian_01 checks
--- Dealing flop [7d, Ah, Ad]
siesopillas checks
Adrian_01 checks
anikanos bets 160
siesopillas folds
Adrian_01 calls 160
--- Dealing turn [Kh]
Adrian_01 checks
anikanos checks
--- Dealing river [6c]
Adrian_01 checks
anikanos checks

hard luck manxy the game sucks at times.

the 4 flopped fullhouses were in the last 8 hands mugsville.

they followed this flopped quads.


Dealing pocket cards
Dealing to manxy_x: [4h, Ts]
wildsantiago folds
manxy_x folds
LUCASPORTOX folds
corvo95 calls 20
anikanos raises 90 to 100
Adrian_01 calls 80
corvo95 calls 80
--- Dealing flop [Ad, 8h, 8c]
anikanos checks
Adrian_01 checks
corvo95 checks
--- Dealing turn [Jh]
anikanos bets 40
Adrian_01 calls 40
corvo95 raises 80 to 80
anikanos calls 40
Adrian_01 raises 85 to 125
corvo95 calls 45
anikanos calls 45
--- Dealing river [As]
anikanos checks
Adrian_01 bets 1775 [all in]
corvo95 folds
anikanos folds
---
Summary:
Main pot: 675 won by Adrian_01 (675)
Rake taken: $0
Seat 2: LUCASPORTOX (2000)
Seat 3: corvo95 (1775), net: -225
Seat 4: anikanos (1775), net: -225
Seat 6: Adrian_01 (2450), net: +450, [8s, 8d] (FOUR_OF_A_KIND EIGHT)
Seat 7: wildsantiago (2000)
Seat 9: manxy_x (2000)
***** End of hand T5-208688445-1 *****
***** History for hand T5-208688445-2 (TOURNAMENT: "$1,000 NL Holdem SH", R-457-939, buy-in: $2.25) *****
Start hand: Tue Jan 17 23:06:50 GMT 2012
Table: Table #52 [208688445] (NO_LIMIT TEXAS_HOLDEM 10/20, Chips)


Utterly contrived garbbage.

i didnt play a hand first round of 20/10.

i planned to see some cheap flops after i doubled thru.
until then tight, then i got my thru so tight ultra aggressive when flop hits.

my double thru.

Start hand: Tue Jan 17 23:22:54 GMT 2012
Table: Table #52 [208688445] (NO_LIMIT TEXAS_HOLDEM 15/30, Chips)
User: manxy_x
Button: seat 6
Players in round: 6
Seat 3: corvo95 (3715)
Seat 4: anikanos (2065)
Seat 6: Adrian_01 (3050)
Seat 7: wildsantiago (1495)
Seat 9: manxy_x (1735)
Seat 10: hopeavalo (1890)
wildsantiago posts small blind (15)
manxy_x posts big blind (30)
---
Dealing pocket cards
Dealing to manxy_x: [9s, Ah]
hopeavalo folds
corvo95 raises 60 to 60
anikanos folds
Adrian_01 folds
wildsantiago calls 45
manxy_x calls 30
--- Dealing flop [6s, 9d, As]
wildsantiago checks
manxy_x checks
corvo95 bets 180
wildsantiago folds
manxy_x raises 360 to 360
corvo95 raises 360 to 540
manxy_x raises 1315 to 1675 [all in]
corvo95 calls 1135
--- Dealing turn [3h]
--- Dealing river [Ts]
---
Summary:
Main pot: 3530 won by manxy_x (3530)
Rake taken: $0
Seat 3: corvo95 (1980), net: -1735, [8s, Ac] (PAIR ACE)
Seat 4: anikanos (2065)
Seat 6: Adrian_01 (3050)
Seat 7: wildsantiago (1435), net: -60
Seat 9: manxy_x (3530), net: +1795, [9s, Ah] (TWO_PAIR ACE, NINE)
Seat 10: hopeavalo (1890)
***** End of hand T5-208688445-21 *****





2 hands later i take the rest of his stack.

***** History for hand T5-208688445-24 (TOURNAMENT: "$1,000 NL Holdem SH", R-457-939, buy-in: $2.25) *****
Start hand: Tue Jan 17 23:25:08 GMT 2012
Table: Table #52 [208688445] (NO_LIMIT TEXAS_HOLDEM 15/30, Chips)
User: manxy_x
Button: seat 10
Players in round: 6
Seat 3: corvo95 (1200)
Seat 4: anikanos (2065)
Seat 6: Adrian_01 (3050)
Seat 7: wildsantiago (1435)
Seat 9: manxy_x (3500)
Seat 10: hopeavalo (2700)
corvo95 posts small blind (15)
anikanos posts big blind (30)
---
Dealing pocket cards
Dealing to manxy_x: [Ad, Tc]
Adrian_01 folds
wildsantiago calls 30
manxy_x calls 30
hopeavalo folds
corvo95 raises 45 to 60
anikanos folds
wildsantiago calls 30
manxy_x calls 30
--- Dealing flop [7d, 8c, Ts]
corvo95 checks
wildsantiago bets 100
manxy_x calls 100
corvo95 calls 100
--- Dealing turn [Ac]
corvo95 checks
wildsantiago checks
manxy_x bets 510
corvo95 raises 1040 to 1040 [all in]
wildsantiago folds
manxy_x calls 530
--- Dealing river [2s]
---
Summary:
Main pot: 2590 won by manxy_x (2590)
Rake taken: $0
Seat 3: corvo95 (0), net: -1200, [Ah, 3d] (PAIR ACE)
Seat 4: anikanos (2035), net: -30
Seat 6: Adrian_01 (3050)
Seat 7: wildsantiago (1275), net: -160
Seat 9: manxy_x (4890), net: +1390, [Ad, Tc] (TWO_PAIR ACE, TEN)
Seat 10: hopeavalo (2700)
***** End of hand T5-208688445-24 *****



then i get a cheap look at 2 cards below my range.



***** History for hand T5-208688445-41 (TOURNAMENT: "$1,000 NL Holdem SH", R-457-939, buy-in: $2.25) *****
Start hand: Tue Jan 17 23:34:35 GMT 2012
Table: Table #52 [208688445] (NO_LIMIT TEXAS_HOLDEM 25/50, Chips)
User: manxy_x
Button: seat 9
Players in round: 6
Seat 3: praiadefaro (3585)
Seat 4: anikanos (2785)
Seat 5: siesopillas (3380)
Seat 6: Adrian_01 (3975)
Seat 9: manxy_x (4640)
Seat 10: hopeavalo (1800)
hopeavalo posts small blind (25)
praiadefaro posts big blind (50)
---
Dealing pocket cards
Dealing to manxy_x: [Jc, As]
anikanos calls 50
siesopillas folds
Adrian_01 calls 50
manxy_x calls 50
hopeavalo folds
praiadefaro checks
--- Dealing flop [Kh, 8s, Qd]
praiadefaro checks
anikanos checks
Adrian_01 checks
manxy_x checks
--- Dealing turn [Jh]
praiadefaro checks
anikanos bets 50
Adrian_01 folds
manxy_x calls 50
praiadefaro calls 50
--- Dealing river [Ad]
praiadefaro checks
anikanos checks
manxy_x bets 200
praiadefaro folds
anikanos folds
---
Summary:
Main pot: 375 won by manxy_x (375)
Rake taken: $0
Seat 3: praiadefaro (3485), net: -100
Seat 4: anikanos (2685), net: -100
Seat 5: siesopillas (3380)
Seat 6: Adrian_01 (3925), net: -50
Seat 9: manxy_x (4915), net: +275
Seat 10: hopeavalo (1775), net: -25



next i get gutted by a mug call from pocket 4s.


Start hand: Tue Jan 17 23:36:35 GMT 2012
Table: Table #52 [208688445] (NO_LIMIT TEXAS_HOLDEM 40/80, Chips)
User: manxy_x
Button: seat 4
Players in round: 6
Seat 3: praiadefaro (3445)
Seat 4: anikanos (3045)
Seat 5: siesopillas (3300)
Seat 6: Adrian_01 (3565)
Seat 9: manxy_x (4915)
Seat 10: hopeavalo (1895)
siesopillas posts small blind (40)
Adrian_01 posts big blind (80)
---
Dealing pocket cards
Dealing to manxy_x: [Ah, Kd]
manxy_x calls 80
hopeavalo raises 320 to 320
praiadefaro folds
anikanos folds
siesopillas folds
Adrian_01 folds
manxy_x raises 4835 to 4915 [all in]
hopeavalo calls 1575 [all in]
--- Dealing flop [Ts, 5c, Th]
--- Dealing turn [6s]
--- Dealing river [Js]
---
Summary:
Main pot: 3910 won by hopeavalo (3910)
Rake taken: $0
Seat 3: praiadefaro (3445)
Seat 4: anikanos (3045)
Seat 5: siesopillas (3260), net: -40
Seat 6: Adrian_01 (3485), net: -80
Seat 9: manxy_x (3020), net: -1895, [Ah, Kd] (PAIR TEN)
Seat 10: hopeavalo (3910), net: +2015, [4s, 4h] (TWO_PAIR TEN, FOUR)
***** End of hand T5-208688445-44 *****
***** History for hand T5-208688445-45 (TOURNAMENT: "$1,000 NL Holdem SH", R-457-939, buy-in: $2.25) *****



then emptied out against the hand in the op.

i was simply cheaply testing the site.

i did the same with several sit n gos.


pm me f you want to scope my crypto days on here, i will give you m player name.
i played mainly 100 dollar SnGs.
93 rating and 30 percent plus ROI.


i played one table a time for fun, then every update just juiced the game more and more, so i kicked it into touch, now i play one home game a week [fri] and one 50 entry casino tourney a week [mon].


i couldnt care tuppence for your thoughts about juicing, i know it is totally contrived,and will not get another cent from me.

faining weakness and trapping is an integral part of my play, just doesnt work online any more, you rarely have the true equity you believe you have.



i started looking at online poker again after many years, because i read a carbon poker rep spouting off on 2plus2,

so i downloaded it and tested it.

over a series of random tables on random days over a month, i counted communty card aces


i spreadheeted the results, i counted 130 community cards per table, starting from when i opened it.

i did that 100 times, that was 100 rows of 130 cards, expressed as N for no ace or Y for an ace.

out of that 100 rows of 130 cards, only 27 had 10 aces or less in them, 73 had 11 or more aces in them.

thats an ace every 8.03 cards hit the board instead of the random 1 in 13.

also a flushed flop happened once ever 8 flops on average instead of 1 in 20 as random flops would.

your reassurance or scorn matters not one jot to me, theyve made a mockery out of the game, and more fool anyone who wants to graft multi table washers, out of the contrived garbbage now served up.

indeed that is my planned modus opeandi.

Not a single day goes by where the online poker forums do not come under bombardment by some new conspiracy theory, or just a new version of an old conspiracy. In this article I will explain three of the most popular conspiracy theories and look at the veracity of each claim.

Online poker conspiracy #1: The online poker sites use “house” players or poker bots.

Summary: The basic premise of the “house player/poker bot” accusation is that the poker sites employ either real players, or use poker bots, who have some type of built-in advantage over the other players: Knowledge of other players’ hole cards, knowledge of the upcoming cards, or something along those lines. These players/bots are then planted at tables to fleece the legitimate players.

Fact or Fiction: This is one of the most common allegations, and the reason so many players can make this assertion is because it is impossible to prove or disprove without the online poker sites agreeing to some form of full audit of their hand histories. So, the jury is completely out on this one; most Poker Pros and people in the industry discount this possibility, but there is no proof either way.

Verdict: Unknown

Online poker conspiracy #2: The online poker sites “juice” the flops to create more action.

Summary: People alleging “juiced” flops believe the sites tinker with the flop texture to insure that multiple players make strong hands. The theory is that if there is a lot of action the rake will be higher, which leads to more income for the online poker site.

Fact or Fiction: This is one of the easier conspiracies to debunk, since the flop cards are completely known -unlike hole cards which often remain hidden. Therefore, many players have been able to look at large samples of flops and have found that each card is just as likely to appear as any other, as well as the lack of “action flops”.

Verdict: Total Fiction

Online poker conspiracy #3: The online poker sites skew the odds to allow bad players to win more often than they should.

Summary: Players making this claim feel that the online poker sites reward bad play. They feel that the odds do not add up: Inside straights hit too often, under-pairs beat over-pairs too often, and so on. The theory is that by having bad plays rewarded ever so slightly more than they should be; bad players will keep their money longer -which leads to more players, which leads to more games, which leads to more rake.

Fact or Fiction: This is another area where many players have done a lot of research with large samples of hands, and have found nothing out of the ordinary. However, even a very slight skewing of the odds can achieve the objective outlined, and although this is another conspiracy that is roundly rejected by most players, it cannot be ruled out entirely without a full audit, since the information can be found in hidden hole cards.

Verdict: Most Likely Fiction

[x] check posting history
[x] troll
[x] The user was successfully added to your blocked list.

troll my arse.

those HHs are real, my scope history from my crypto days are real, and anyone can prove or make a liar out of my merge claims by simply doing those basic live tests.


if the game has been tainted like that, then why trust they just stopped there.

run a mile from the contrived garbbage.

Missed out on some fun here!

Manxy,

This is a small forum i would take this indisputable evidence to a larger forum like 2+2 or Blonde so more people can laugh at you!

hth.

this open offer still stands.


manxy
18 Jan 12 17:15
Joined:
09 Oct 10
| Topic/replies: 3,121 | Blogger: manxy's blog
would either of you like to play 20 pounds a point with me.

for every 130 community cards per table, which you can choose on carbon [merge network],
i will pay you 20 ponds for every ace under 10 in the sequence of 130 community cards,
you how ever only have to pay me 16 pounds for ever ace over 10 in the 130 community
card sequence, even with a 20 percent advantage, how much would either of you be prepared to lose before you admitted they are ace heavy boards, and about as random as the days of the week.






i would recommend due diligence, before accepting.

there is only one b in garbage

no your wrong, but ofcourse you know that.

i planned to sit tight, and see a few cheap flops, set mine etc.
i wanted to get into top 20 quickly, first opportunity to see a cheap flop was with ace 9, i was big blind, i called a 30 raise into 150 pot, a raise from a player ho raised into every hand double the bb.

i spiked 2 pair, he bet the pot, i raised him, at this point i was only worried about the flush draw, couldnt see him having trips, when he re-raised me again i knew he had spiked the ace, you only had to have watched his play to know, that gave me a stack to look at a few more cheap flops hence a cheap look at the flop with ace 10, same muppit same scenario.


my AK reraise allin was to take the pot down there and then, he had only put in about 15 percent of his stack, i would of been folding to the table rocks all in, there again i wouldnt of been raising in with pocket 4s, not when there was a 42 percent chance of another pocket pair being dealt out.

Manxy yr a bad player, playing 2 buck donkfests against some of the worst poker players on the entire planet, losing, and blaming God knows what. Any credibility you may think you have, went when you posted the very first hand in this thread.

The hands you have posted are idiots playing bingo. All they prove is that the world is full of donks.

Seriously, take what tiny shreds of dignity you have left, and quit while you are behind.

Do you save hand histories?

pm me for myusernae to double check my earl crypto stats.

he is a funny littleman alright 70 ability rating 3,800 games to make 2k about 55c a game, and telling me to read a few books after 28 years of live play.

Maths clearly not your strong suit.

I work in a proper job for a living. I make about 6 grand a year tax free playing a bit of poker in my spare time. I'm not Phil Ivey, but I have 6 winning accounts across 6 different networks, all at the expense of players who blame everything but their own bad play when they lose.

Everyone on this thread has took the pish out of you old timer. I've actually tried to give you some sound advice. If you dont want it, then fair enough.