Last week, my daughters other half had some awful news ...
His business partners son had got caught in the blinds at home and died, he was just 3 years old.
They have dedicated a website to make parents aware of these blinds and the danger they pose - they very same blinds are banned in the US
the website is here:
http://www.harrisonslaw.co.uk/
If this website saves the life of just 1 child it will be worthwhile and i would really appreciate it if anyone that has the means could help raise the profile of the site.
Obvisouly condolances to your family friend, but to be blunt, why do we need to ban a product that has killed 3-4 people per year from a population of 300 million. Surely this is a fantastic safety statistic?
Do we also ban chewing gum which has a higher fatality rate?
To answer your question though, any babycare forums would help spread this like wildfire, but sitting on the fence and playing devils advocate I am not sure it needs to be banned? I bet more people died from "safer" things all over the world, no?
Obvisouly condolances to your family friend, but to be blunt, why do we need to ban a product that has killed 3-4 people per year from a population of 300 million. Surely this is a fantastic safety statistic? Do we also ban chewing gum which has a
Understand what you are saying Jim, however, there must be something in the idea of banning them if the US has done so already????
Remember the push chairs that were banned in the US last year but not here?
They are now banned because of the same issues.
Also, good point, one child saved is worth the banning of them
Good idea for the child care sites btw
Cheers
Understand what you are saying Jim, however, there must be something in the idea of banning them if the US has done so already????Remember the push chairs that were banned in the US last year but not here?They are now banned because of the same issue
These types of chords have been banned from production in the USA following 359 childrens deaths between 1985 and 1995.
Jim, you mention 2 to 3 a year, try crunching your figures again
looks like 30 plus to me
These types of chords have been banned from production in the USA following 359 childrens deaths between 1985 and 1995.Jim, you mention 2 to 3 a year, try crunching your figures againlooks like 30 plus to me
yeah sorry, obv its 30 to 40 per year. which is odds of a mere 8.5 Million / 1 compared to say an asteroid killing you at 0.5M/1, (and much less in America too). I still think you need a better reason than the fatality rate.
Ban asteroids I say ;-)
yeah sorry, obv its 30 to 40 per year. which is odds of a mere 8.5 Million / 1 compared to say an asteroid killing you at 0.5M/1, (and much less in America too). I still think you need a better reason than the fatality rate.Ban asteroids I say ;-)
Hey Jim, i appreciate your points and everything and respect your feelings on this.
Perhaps it is just one of those things that happens and like buses comes in two's, however, another child died this tuesday in stafford from the same cause.
Anyway, here is the facebook page if anyone would care to support the cause, but please, no negative points
Hey Jim, i appreciate your points and everything and respect your feelings on this.Perhaps it is just one of those things that happens and like buses comes in two's, however, another child died this tuesday in stafford from the same cause.Anyway, her
jim - wat a load of twaddle ffs,how can u compare stats from chewy and asteroids to make a point against something which imo i would expect no deaths from???
just silly ,u wanna find summin to do with your time!
will get on and donate soon.
condolences to those involved.jim - wat a load of twaddle ffs,how can u compare stats from chewy and asteroids to make a point against something which imo i would expect no deaths from???just silly ,u wanna find summin to do with your time!will get o
to be fair Jim is way beyond correct. wp. i would have thought the same thing (maybe not have posted it tho). speeding limits, drink drive limits, assaults(u can shake someones hand and that is classed as assualt technically), parking restrictions etc etc. the country(maybe the whole civilaised world) is finished as far as i am concerned. gonna be a lot of mental time bombs blowing up in the next tens years+ IMO
if things go the way they are going we wont be able to buy a sharp pencil and the same people will moan about the lack of sensibility.
i havent read the article and won't tbo but stats are stats.
to be fair Jim is way beyond correct. wp.i would have thought the same thing (maybe not have posted it tho).speeding limits, drink drive limits, assaults(u can shake someones hand and that is classed as assualt technically), parking restrictions etc
at the end of the day, certain products shouldn't be killing people and you shouldn't expect blinds to have much of a fatality rate. surely they can be designed better and do the same job.
at the end of the day, certain products shouldn't be killing people and you shouldn't expect blinds to have much of a fatality rate. surely they can be designed better and do the same job.
and if i had a small kid i wouldn't want these blinds with cords in my home because no offence, they look dangerous. so deaths can also be prevented by not having them in the house, not just banning them from being produced.
and if i had a small kid i wouldn't want these blinds with cords in my home because no offence, they look dangerous. so deaths can also be prevented by not having them in the house, not just banning them from being produced.
Case in Scotland in the last year or so thats similar, offical guy at the inquest said that something should be done. But then again there,s a market for someone building "child proof" blinds and charging a small premium for a better product.
Although its sad I also take the view you can,t legiislate for every eventuallity, you can give incentives to move in a direction.
Case in Scotland in the last year or so thats similar, offical guy at the inquest said that something should be done. But then again there,s a market for someone building "child proof" blinds and charging a small premium for a better product.Although
ffs, ur saying they shouldn't be banned coz they haven't killed enough kids yet!! Yes u cant ban everything in the world that causes a few deaths but these blinds can obviously be produced in a safer way, A loss of 1 childs life is more than enough to look at changing the product to make it safer, and those who make a joke of it, have u got kids?? or just born a heartless**t?
ffs, ur saying they shouldn't be banned coz they haven't killed enough kids yet!! Yes u cant ban everything in the world that causes a few deaths but these blinds can obviously be produced in a safer way, A loss of 1 childs life is more than enough t