Totally agree with chipfire227, i think he is a rich fish and playing for fun which makes him even more dangerous loool

TheEagle beat him and he was **ing.

Sansome beat him and he was **ing.

Giorgio beat him and he was **ing.

Anyone spotting a pattern here?

Anyone who starts beating him either gets accused of **ing or is subject to streams of table abuse from him and his cronies.

Any idiot can win 6 HU on the trot, even I have managed 8. I suspect there would not be as much of a problem here if he had been playing $250 or $500 HU.

Tuna Canoe 08 Jan 19:03
TheEagle beat him and he was **ing.

Sansome beat him and he was **ing.

Giorgio beat him and he was **ing.

Anyone spotting a pattern here?

Anyone who starts beating him either gets accused of **ing or is subject to streams of table abuse from him and his cronies.

This man chats sense sansone has played betfair for years and years and used to spew money all over the place gets lucky in a few hu sng now hes a **?lmfao maybe he can just afford to** 2.5k up the wall where as kanga loses and thinks hes been **ed lololol.the money clearly means more to him the the italian spew monkey.

Here's one for you guy's Mrkangaroo was down minus $10k+ on sharkscope not so long ago then he played Befair's Imper1um and won 6 out of 6 heads up PLO STT for $15k to put him in the black, anything dodgy here?? is MrKangaroo a superuser?? or is Mrkangaroo a sore loser because he lost to a rich Italian fish with alot more money than him??

I am now no. 1 follower of :

http://kangapoker.blogspot.com/

What no stats...?

just read the kang blog - I watched these games as I have watched similar games in past of high stakes sng on bf - (I dont hang around for these games :-) Just happen to be playing when games are on, kang, puntz etc have always been on my watch list) They are funny games these because it does seem as if opp can see both sets of cards - has an answer for everything and is one step ahead. You could say that it is just one player totally outplaying another but when you actually see these games you do not get that oppinion. It always seems like the Italian or whoever it is always is one step ahead - software hacking is a real possibility as if you have the knowledge you can hack anything. Recent hacks on accounts on ft have been seen, one recently was a red pros wife who lost 30k from hacked account. The prob is we can discuss this all day long but will never have a definitive answer - I would if I was Kang is just not play these names when they appear - however I also understand the greed that pushes you to play for these stakes against anyone who appears :-)

that's the worst you could find. That is me describing a funny game which I have played once.

Kangaroo rubs you down after big pots and talks like an a$$hole to fish. There is a huge difference, especially as this is a poker forum.

who said I drive a cheap car? You're totally right - that post shows I am a sad person with no life because I wound down a window, shouted something at some chavs and posted about it. Kangaroo's chat (for the few times I've heard it) does not tilt me, it just shows he is a prck. Pull your nuts out mate.

I did it once, thought it was funny, posted about it. I think I got one or two laughs and some putdowns, no big deal. This is a poker forum and I was expressing my view as to his attitude on the table. You are sticking up for him with no idea about what he said. I do appreciate your concern for him and the chavs of the world (who I abused once). Gl at the tables.

thread isnt about kangas chat- he has made plenty money by being abusive and tilting people, if they fall for it then its their own faults.


thread is about an alleged **/superuser type thing. still nobody wanted to answer as to why a superuser would open push with a just a gutshot into a set. if the player could see both sets of holecards why would he shove when he knows hes getting called. if he "knows" what card is coming next again why would he shove and arise suspicion. surely he would just check call then shove turn. if you think anyone is going to fold a set in a heads up game just because the gutshot str8 has arrived then your wrong. the other hand with the k5 is a rly standard play in heads up games, he has represented a hand on the turn and got lucky on the river..... its hardly like thats never happened before. kanga seems to say that he flatted the check raise because the guy had to fire the river if the king doesnt come- i dont agree at all. if i make a move like that on the turn in a heads up game and get flat called i dont always push the river and follow it through, sometimes i do of course but more often than not ive made a move been caught with fingers in till so give up on the river (although if i make that move on the turn i will usually have a couple of overs at least so the king should definately be a scare card).

this guy is definately just a lucky aggresive rich bloke who has ran like a god for 6 games. It happens. I beat someone 9 games in a row 2 weeks ago and hit everything. Made some good hero calls and hit some miracles when i made moves and got looked up. I didnt get accused of being a superuser though- i just called a lucky cnut

maybe not everyone leaves?

dibble, of course, another a little exaggeration on my part. If that is part of the game, (it is) then of course he is entitled to do it. Still doesnt make him less of a prck.

HU4ROLLZ? = builder86....right...?