If you satelite into a game eg: you win a sat into a $100 + $9 game, does this count as $9 caked and will you cake back 30% on the $9 or would u only cake the initial sat amount?
The first reply is right if you sat into a $109 tourney you get cakeback on the sat fee and the $9 fee for the main event.
This is not in dispute this is a fact, anyone who thinks different must live in fecking Brighton!
Are you all mental?????The first reply is right if you sat into a $109 tourney you get cakeback on the sat fee and the $9 fee for the main event.This is not in dispute this is a fact, anyone who thinks different must live in fecking Brighton!
Well in T&Cs on most affiliate sites it clearly states u only get rb on 'r a ke PAID'
Therefore i assumed since u only paid the fee on the sat entry u would only get the rb on that...
remember if everyone is on a cakeback deal they will all be getting cakeback on the fees they paid too, so the final 'seats' will alreay have had the cakeback fees returned to the players.
I could be wrong but how can it work any other way?
Well in T&Cs on most affiliate sites it clearly states u only get rb on 'r a ke PAID'Therefore i assumed since u only paid the fee on the sat entry u would only get the rb on that...remember if everyone is on a cakeback deal they will all be getting
Therefore i assumed since u only paid the fee on the sat entry u would only get the rb on that...
Your prize for winning the satellite is worth $109, $100 plus $9 fee, the entry price for the tourney. You therefore pay a total of $10 in fees, which would be enough for a Madeira or Walnut and Date cake from M&S
Therefore i assumed since u only paid the fee on the sat entry u would only get the rb on that...Your prize for winning the satellite is worth $109, $100 plus $9 fee, the entry price for the tourney. You therefore pay a total of $10 in fees, which w
Example, if ten runners each pay $10+1 and so $10 is paid in rake only the $100 goes into pool. If the winner gets say $75+7 seat, and the runner up gets the remaining $18 in cash, then the $75+7 is once again paying rake. It may be forced but it is paid once again.
It might help to think about it in T$ situations.
you pay rake twice, and [should] get**twice.Example, if ten runners each pay $10+1 and so $10 is paid in rake only the $100 goes into pool. If the winner gets say $75+7 seat, and the runner up gets the remaining $18 in cash, then the $75+7 is once a
you pay cake twice, and [should] get cakeback twice.
Example, if ten runners each pay $10+1 and so $10 is paid in cake only the $100 goes into pool. If the winner gets say $75+7 seat, and the runner up gets the remaining $18 in cash, then the $75+7 is once again paying cake. It may be forced but it is paid once again.
It might help to think about it in T$ situations.
you pay cake twice, and [should] get cakeback twice.Example, if ten runners each pay $10+1 and so $10 is paid in cake only the $100 goes into pool. If the winner gets say $75+7 seat, and the runner up gets the remaining $18 in cash, then the $75+7 i