NOT THIS for me :) Too many times you're beating another ace that will just check behind you imo, though maybe not this particular hand lol. Unless it's A3 in this case?
NOT THIS for me :) Too many times you're beating another ace that will just check behind you imo, though maybe not this particular hand lol. Unless it's A3 in this case?
snap call, reload move on. its 1/2 so guy can easily have ak aq a3 a2 etc. for what you have left compared to pot its correct in lond run to call. if you lose you lose so be it
snap call, reload move on. its 1/2 so guy can easily have ak aq a3 a2 etc. for what you have left compared to pot its correct in lond run to call. if you lose you lose so be it
exactly a riston, i only need to win 25%, but am i winning against a passive players raise here that often? imo depends on whether he thinks any two pair is the nuts.
there are plenty of players where it's an easy fold and i wouldn't give it a second thought but something mong like struck me about him. still, i wasn't sure so thought i would post it to see what others thought.
obv he had jj
exactly a riston, i only need to win 25%, but am i winning against a passive players raise here that often? imo depends on whether he thinks any two pair is the nuts.there are plenty of players where it's an easy fold and i wouldn't give it a second