I think that I'm right in saying that it's the top 3 finishers in each stage, not the top three in the overalls.
Given that his B sample might not be back until after the Tour finishes, and that diuretics do not warrant immediate suspension in the rules, Schleck's performances to date could well still be admissable.
^^^Do not take this as gospel, but it is my understanding of how the team competition works. Radioshack may yet choose to forfeit Schleck's performances though.
The long and short of it is that I wouldn't be touching this market with a bargepole at the moment.
BE VERY CAREFULI think that I'm right in saying that it's the top 3 finishers in each stage, not the top three in the overalls.Given that his B sample might not be back until after the Tour finishes, and that diuretics do not warrant immediate suspen
yeah im fully expecting his results to date to count but equally if wiggo froomedog and rogers finish well in the pyrenees then smash up the time trial, i think theyve got a better than 12.5% chance of toppling radioshack. and theres always the jackpot team removal.
havent gone huge or anything but this feels a good thing at 7/1
yeah im fully expecting his results to date to count but equally if wiggo froomedog and rogers finish well in the pyrenees then smash up the time trial, i think theyve got a better than 12.5% chance of toppling radioshack. and theres always the jackp
Schleck is not actually kicked out of the Tour. His team have withdrawn him so no reason to believe that his results won't count (if indeed any of them have counted at all anyway)
Going to have a look now
Schleck is not actually kicked out of the Tour. His team have withdrawn him so no reason to believe that his results won't count (if indeed any of them have counted at all anyway)Going to have a look now