North American
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 540 comments are related to the topic:
NFL WEEK 13
NFL WEEK 13
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 540
|
By:
see u for the snooker 2mrow wiseone!!
|
|
By:
 |
|
By:
Glad I covered the Packers at 1.29 earlier. I would of been fuming
|
|
By:
can never write them off, especially with rodgers. crazy game
|
|
By:
What an amazing 2nd half that was , gotta love the NFL and Aaron Rodgers. Oh and Packers haters
 |
|
By:
Two unbelievable finishes in a row after the game on Monday
|
|
By:
Very true Jucel!!
|
|
By:
What an amazing finish, WD any winners and very bad luck to losers... albeit I assume if you bet on here you had every opportunity to get out.
Was watching the NHL so only watched the 2nd half this morning. If I hadn't know the result I would not have believed it. |
|
By:
Great win but they clearly have issues to overcome the Packers.
|
|
By:
Yeah they have big issue's but the defence again played really well last night - take a win whatever way it comes and move on. With Rodgers at qb there is always a chance
|
|
By:
anyone know the highest price on the Packers??? Thanks
|
|
By:
100
|
|
By:
by laying the Lions @ 1.01
|
|
By:
1.01 £500 £11,238
1.02 £815 1.03 £764 1.04 £2,960 1.05 £22,181 1.06 £73,204 1.07 £64,746 |
|
By:
just over 11k traded @ 1.01
|
|
By:
Thanks wisewords
 I know Detroit hit 1.01 , just wondering did anybody manage to get higher than 100/1 the green bay side?? |
|
By:
nope I checked. it was only something like 40 highest on the Packers odds
|
|
By:
Oh really that low. No worries thanks for the reply wisewords
 |
|
By:
40 or 60. I can't remember exactly, but I checked because like you I wanted to see if anything was matched at 100 or higher
|
|
By:
Bills are far too short at home to a Texan team who are ballin. Texans ML
Rams are woeful, and Cards after escaping last week should bring some heat to keep the pressure on the Panthers. Cards -5.5 Bucs on the improve at home to a Falcons side getting worse by the week. Bucs ML 7 points a generous line for the Colts at Pittsburgh who are better without Luck in the lineup. I would have it less than a TD. Colts +7 |
|
By:
Do you mean Colts are better without Luck because he is injured or in genereal
 |
|
By:
gone for a speculative treble...rams,Giants NAP,Saints
|
|
By:
like the giants too johnny,
but my nap is seattle  |
|
By:
should be a good game vs the vikes
what i like about the vikes recently is they keep finding ways to win hawks can't afford any more slip ups if they want to be in the p/offs |
|
By:
in fact i fancy them so much that ive layed vikings+7.5
|
|
By:
bobbyyyyyyyyy |
|
By:
perma tan Jeff in the studio
|
|
By:
seahawks, jags, texans, giants, falcons, cards - 3.5, chargers on a mug acca.
|
|
By:
ur certainly not lacking ambition SJ
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
ill be laughing at 9.20pm grant
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
fumble tho
|
|
By:
7-0 seahakws in 40 seconds
|
|
By:
7-0
|
|
By:
think hawks are better off w/o beast mode strange as it seems
don't think the dude's all the ticket and there's more going on behind the scenes than is being let on this Rawls is no muppet |
|
By:
one thing i will say on a note rugby vs NFL
the former beats the latter hands down vis a vis tackling but i love the NFL |
|
By:
We just signed him up for big money for next 3 years johnny, him working in tandem with rawls could be very potent
|
|
By:
just cashed out of my NYG for £70 profit
pretty sure they'll get it done but Eli can throw a pick or 2 |
|
By:
who's we...swardean?
|