Forums

We want to share an important update with our Betfair Community users.

Over the coming months, the Betfair Community platform will be winding down. The final active day for the platform will be December 21st. From December 22nd, users will no longer be able to access the platform.

Your discussions, insights, engagement, and, most importantly, feedback have helped shape the platform and guided innovation. Your feedback continues to be important to us, and we will continue to listen via our dedicated feedback channels, as well as through product testing and innovations.

To share your feedback and experience, visit: https://support.betfair.com/app/home

North American

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 90 comments are related to the topic:
Tony Romo appreciation thread

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 2 of 3  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 90
By:
TexassportsagentBuzz
When: 05 Jan 15 00:21
What a play on 4th and long.
By:
TexassportsagentBuzz
When: 05 Jan 15 00:21
MVP! MVP! MVP!
By:
sc1883
When: 05 Jan 15 00:33
Romo done his job, come on defence do yours now - squeeky bum time!!!!!!!
By:
casemoney
When: 05 Jan 15 00:59
Him and Jerry on Their hands and Knees Sucking Zebra C ock as I type Laugh
By:
Swagger
When: 05 Jan 15 03:15
I could barely watch the last few minutes. Not one of Tony's best games but it was pleaswing that when it really mattered he converted the clutch passes. All the Lions fans bemoaning the flag/non flag in the fourth quarter yet forgetting all the calls against the Cowboys earlier in the game - comical and embarrassing. E.g and I only saw it once but the Lions got a roughing the kicker penalty flag yet the Cowboys didn't get one for a very similar play - both huge calls at pivotal moments. Thankfully Tony is clutch Love
By:
johnnythebull
When: 05 Jan 15 11:41
sorry,fanboys...still not convinced by Romo
instances there where he drew the sacks losing yardage instead of throwing the ball away
admit it was a good throw to Williams but on replay Williams did really well to change direction at the death in the endzone..respect
they can't afford to get behind the 8 ball against GB
that's what they thrive on
they have to start scoring from the get-go & keep scoring
i think Rodger's calf is going to bite them in the mouth
will be their achilles heel
imo he's the best out there
but WILL be inconvenienced by his injury
GB defo beatable
seahawks not invincible either as is no team
By:
Princes Purple Guitar
When: 05 Jan 15 15:44
great game
By:
TexassportsagentBuzz
When: 06 Jan 15 14:07
He had the best QB rating in the League during the regular season, and now after winning his first playoff match in 8 years nothing can stop him.
By:
grayhawk
When: 06 Jan 15 16:53
Had a good season..hope he has a shocker Sunday Wink
By:
grayhawk
When: 09 Jan 15 17:05
Didn't realise that Romo has the second highest career QB rating ever Shocked....ahead of Manning and Brady.

It also shows how good Steve Young was when he's the only QB in the top eight who isn't still playing ( harder for QBs in years gone by )
By:
dlarssonf
When: 10 Jan 15 12:42
sort of shows you though that it means fcuk all especially comparing the careers of Brady & Romo.  Romo has always had the ability , its under pressure when it matters most and until now he has lacked badly in that department.  Just hope it continue's tomorrow Wink
By:
Swagger
When: 10 Jan 15 23:29
Nice throw by Brady in the first half - if that was Romo social media would be having a field day. Also, regardless of what happens tomorrow, Romo showed last week that he can handle the pressure when he doesn't have to make all the plays himself. The fourth down throw to Witten, and the two third down and long touchdown passes to Williams showed he has the metal when he has an offensive line but the Packers are some team so if the Cowboys lose it will put on Romo's shoulders when in reality the Cowboys will have been beaten by a better team.
By:
TexassportsagentBuzz
When: 11 Jan 15 21:15
19 attempts 15 completions (should be 16) 2 TD's  0 INT's.
143.6 Quarterback rating...


ELITE
By:
sc1883
When: 11 Jan 15 21:42
devastated, if only that catch had stood :(   That defeat to the redskins was always going to come back to hurt us, will be spending the next few weeks thinking what could have been now.
By:
grayhawk
When: 11 Jan 15 21:54
He played well again Texas....maybe he will finally get some people off his back.
By:
Swagger
When: 12 Jan 15 03:03
Grayhawk - I hope the Packers go all the way. I still feel physically sick from the reversal on the Bryant catch but maybe I'm being bias. All other fans around me said it was a bad call but I read they changed the rules 4 years ago. All I know it was a ballsy call by Garret to go for it on fourth down, it was a ballsy thrown by Romo with the season on the line and in my opinion it was a ballsy catch by Bryant. I probably won't be able to watch the other games as it just sickens me when in professional sport you see a decision like that which in my opinion is anti-sport. I wanted to see if Rogers could go down the field on one leg and win the game for the Packers, if he could then fair play. We are left with in my opinion a very questionable call which reversed the decision on the field (rare in itself) which essentially put pay to the best part of a years work of preparation - why bother!
By:
Swagger
When: 12 Jan 15 03:14
Patriots have won the SB so well done to people on them at good prices. They will destroy the Colts next week, not too bothered whoever wins out of the other two - Brady knows he will win it this year. Rogers isn't 100%, it's plain to see. I still don't understand how the Bryant Catch wasn't deemed a catch. Even if they have changed the rules, a guy a catches a ball, brings it in (possession), then afer 3 steps reaches out for a touchdown... for a sport to rule that a non catch is just laughable. It's worse than the roughing the kicker which wasn't called against the Seahawks last season against the 49ers at a critical stage which essentially won them the game and in effect the Superbowl. Worse officiating that football over here - just makes you think why do you bother wasting your time with it all
By:
therhino
When: 12 Jan 15 06:03
it just sickens me when in professional sport you see a decision like that which in my opinion is anti-sport

Brilliantly worded Swagger. They made the play, and it was a massive play, for it to not stand I won't try to come up with any more apt words because you nailed it - it is anti-sport.
By:
grayhawk
When: 12 Jan 15 11:14
A passionate and reasoned response Swagger.....as a fan of the game i'd hate to lose with a call like that so we can only imagine how the Dallas players and staff feel.....

It was a brilliant catch and it just seems so wrong that the ruling states that it wasn't.

As rhino says..you put it well
By:
therhino
When: 12 Jan 15 11:29
Dez Bryant on twitter: as I went to the ground I rolled over and I tipped the ball to gain better control.. We lost and I accept it but please change that rule

Amen Dez.
By:
Swagger
When: 12 Jan 15 11:33
It's also that we were all robbed of seeing an amazing last 3 minutes.
Would Dallas have punched in the touchdown from the 1 yard line - most probably yes with four downs.
Would Dallas have made the 2 point conversion - maybe
Would Rogers have got points for the Packers - I think he would have got at least a field goal if not a touchdown as he was hitting top form in the second half.
This would have left it to Romo to win the game if he had enough time on the clock which is what every neutral wanted to see

I have read the rules and loads of peoples opinion on the play, in my opinion (again I admit maybe I'm bias) but for me the main point is that the rule that was applied to overturn the catch was incorrectly applied to that particular play. We all know the various arguments for and against the catch I have read fair arguments both ways - that is part of the problem as I think the current rules are too subjective and open to debate so I think the NFL need to clear it up for future as imagine a Superbowl won/lost on a play reversed like that, just bad for the sport. The official nearest the call deemed it a catch so I was very surprised the call on the field was reversed, had he deemed it incomplete on the field then it's more understandable why they wouldn't reverse it the other way. With a close subjective call like that they normally go with the official who calls it live closest to the play which I think is the fairest way.

People might think it's fair enough the Cowboys went out after they got a break last week against the Lions - the point I would make is in that game I thought the Lions got every close call in the first half so it wasn't all one way traffic and they still had time to win the game after the flag was picked up - they muffed their punt immediately after the call and that was their own fault.

I think when all is said and done, the turning point was Dan Bailey missing the field goal at the end of the second quarter as I don't think the Packers would have come back from 17-7 but fair play to Rogers, he made a lovely throw to bring about the field goal to make it 14-10 at half time. The irony is Bailey is known as the iceman and clutch with his kicking and Romo has/had a reputation of choking when it really mattered yet in the last two play off games the roles were reversed!
By:
Swagger
When: 12 Jan 15 11:47
Also, Suh should have been suspended against the Cowboys for what he did to Rogers, one of the main reasons the Cowboys/Lions game was close was because of Suh who had a great game pressuring Romo but how he was allowed to play was beyond me. So for all the bitter Lions fans on other threads/forums banging on about the PI call/non call don't forget that!

I'm not bitter just disappointed a great play was taken away from the sport and that we didn't get to the see the last 3-4 minutes unfold. Any way wish the Pack all the best and I just hope Rogers has enough mobility to do himself justice next week against the Seahawks.
By:
therhino
When: 12 Jan 15 11:48
I think the crux of it all, i believe, in plays like that, any benefit should be with the team making the play, in this case Dallas. The rules shouldn't just govern the game, they should encourage attacking, exciting play - what we all want to see! In cricket the benefit of doubt goes to the batsman, in soccer benefit of the offside rule goes to the attacker (at least it's meant to), in the NBA they have the magic circle beneath the rim where you can't be called with a charge - all rules that aren't just a matter of governance, but also designed to promote excitement, which strengthens the product. The NFL lost a highlight that would've been famous for years today and instead have controversy. That's a loss.
By:
Swagger
When: 12 Jan 15 12:00
Therhino - yes my friend said something similar to me last night and I agree with you. It's just bad for the sport as for example Bryant could have easily tucked the ball in and Dallas punch in the touchdown from the one yard line but he was going for the spectacular play on the premise that he had already secured and maintained possesion of the ball. So the rule whether it should have been applied or not promotes negative regulation boring plays which is contrary to what makes sport unique.

A definition of sport (noun) in the online Oxford Dictionary: -

An activity involving physical exertion and skill in which an individual or team competes against another or others for entertainment

Where was the "entertainment" in reversing the catch last night? Sport was the loser not just the Cowboys. I think even the most die hard Packers fans wanted the catch to stand to see their bad man Aaron Rogers win the game for them - everyone would have accepted that.
By:
Whisperingdeath
When: 12 Jan 15 12:48
I think even the most die hard Packers fans wanted the catch to stand to see their bad man Aaron Rogers win the game for them - everyone would have accepted that.


Are you on crack? Have you any idea how tortuous it was for Packers fans last night?

We marvelled at the atleticism of the catch and the defensive effort of Shield's, still don't understand the rule, think it's extremely unfair but remain absolutely delighted and without shame!
By:
Swagger
When: 12 Jan 15 13:31
haha fair Whispering. Had that been the Packers with that throw there would have been a part of me thinking, fair play, I want to see Romo make the winning drive now to define his season. So I think there would have been a part, however small, of you thinking fair play - let Aaron win the game but maybe I'm wrong! Yes Shields did very well on that play.
By:
johnnythebull
When: 12 Jan 15 13:41
at the end of the day the kite jerry was writing out in the review booth wasn't generous enough...fin d'histoire
dallas led & were not able to kill the game off
professional losers & chokers
they were playing against a cripple led offense ffs
re the catch..tremendous athleticism..unlucky imho to get the call reversed
but they should've put the game to bed prior to that & as per usual(when it counts)they didn't
as for romo fangirls
i'm sorry he DOES NOT get it done when it counts
whereas the cripple on the other side does & did
unfortunately for him
he has hardly healed after 2 weeks off
and with only another week till next sunday
he can look forward to an uber physical,athletic,quick D jumping all over him
By:
johnnythebull
When: 12 Jan 15 13:46
BTW..je ne suis pas charlie...je suis moi
Liberte..egalite..fraternite to all forumitesGrin
By:
Swagger
When: 12 Jan 15 17:00
Come on Johnny - how can you blame the Romo?

He was playing with injured ribs and effectively a broken back as well. Credit to Rodgers who was exceptional in the second half especially given his torn calf but I don't see how that loss can be blamed on Romo. He made a few bonehead plays in not throwing the ball away and got sacked but he made the important throws when he had to, including the catch to Bryant at the end. Bailey's missed field goal attempt and Murray's fumble were the two self induced errors by the Cowboys but that's American Football for you and they still should have made Green Bay take the game into overtime or win it. Rodgers has lost a bunch of play off games recently but I still regard him as the best QB - it's often fine margins at this stage so I can't agree that Romo didn't get it done/choked - he threw that pass to Bryant on 4th and 2 with the season on the line - come on chokers wouldn't have even attempted the throw.
By:
dlarssonf
When: 12 Jan 15 17:01
I still think that if the catch stood Rodgers would have won the game for Green Bay
By:
Swagger
When: 12 Jan 15 17:06
dlarssonf - maybe so but it would have been great to have seen the game come to its natural conclusion for all round closure. We will never know - Dallas may have got the TD, the 2 point conversion and Rodgers may have seen the clock out and won the game with a TD, or thrown a pick given the pressure (unlikely but you never know with the season on the line with one leg!), or only got enough yardage for a field goal giving Romo a minute to win the game with no timeouts etc (might have won it or thrown a pick himself!). For me it was just such a shame that the game ended the way it did and it's just brushed under the carpet and when you read the record books we will only see a Green Bay win.
By:
johnnythebull
When: 12 Jan 15 17:30
SWAGGER
you write coherently
not saying Romo is a choker per se but his(the team's)records in p/offs is there in black & white
they don't get it done
or,especially yesterday they conspire,in one form or another to NOT get it done
media bigging them up to the skies
they had no excuse to not deliver after being in front but once again didn't
all the semantics ain't going to change the result
hawks starting to look awesome
but if you knew A Rod could miraculously recover b4 sunday
think it would go down to the wire
7.4 on here 4 SB
that's a massive price
solely because of A Rod's 'injury'
By:
dlarssonf
When: 12 Jan 15 17:52
Yeah I agree with you Swagger but the rule was called correctly and for me it was more of a disgrace that the flag was picked up last week against Detroit.  As a packer fan if what happened to Dez yesterday happened to Nelson or Cobb I would be sick too but if I was a Lions fan I would be fuming at what was basically cheating last week
By:
dlarssonf
When: 13 Jan 15 18:40
Swagger you are been a touch bias , there was no bad call in the Detroit game but a real injustice in the Packers game???  that flag should never have been picked up , it was a disgrace and Dallas would have been nowhere near Lambeau Field otherwise.

Can't have it both ways. It was a disgrace what happened in the Detroit Game ( as a neutral ) and it was very harsh what happened Dez Byrant ( as a Packers fan )
By:
Swagger
When: 14 Jan 15 13:16
I'm not saying it wasn't a bad call in the Detroit game but how many times do you see a similar play where a flag isn't thrown and you think that looked like PI but wasn't called. Teams will get those go for and against them at some point all season and my point was that the flags being picked up made it look worse. Also regards Detroit if Suh wasn't playing, which he clearly shouldn't have been, then Detroit would have got little pressure on Romo so chances are they would have been gassed much earlier. Also the roughing the kicker or whatever call the Lions got and the Cowboys didn't get for a similar play in the first half were also big swings in the game. That's football so on balance I don't think the Lions have too much to moan about - the facts speaks for themselves.

http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nfl-shutdown-corner/nfl-tells-cowboys-they-missed-seven-penalties-on-lions-as-well-171012009.html

The Competition Committee are considering changing the catch rule which arguably shouldn't have even been applied to the Bryant catch is a completely different matter.
By:
dlarssonf
When: 14 Jan 15 18:48
The issue wasn't the call.  The whole point is that flag been picked up never happens like that ever.  It was a disgraceful decision which affected the outcome of the game.
By:
sc1883
When: 14 Sep 15 09:54
Mr Clutch is back!!!!!!! Romo's year?
By:
therhino
When: 17 Oct 16 07:41
Does anyone think there is any possible way Romo can get his job back barring an injury to Dak? Surely a new era in Dallas has started. If Big Ben's knee is no good, then the Steelers have until Nov. 1 to trade someone in. Seems like a no brainer to me - Romo leading the Steelers to the SB to take on Dallas. Wouldn't that be something Excited
By:
sc1883
When: 17 Oct 16 12:55
Ive always been behind Romo but you cannot take Dak out of that team while he's making plays and helping earn the Wins. The offense currently seems to have great chemistry and bringing back Romo could change that. Romo will always be there if or when Dak hits the wall. Also Romo retires a Cowboy, no team will inherit that huge contract on a old and body broken QB. I honestly don't believe he would put his body thru hell for another franchise. Great position for the Cowboys to be in for a change!
By:
SimpleJack
When: 17 Oct 16 16:56
****g stupid german ****g **** , what an absolute ****g arse
Page 2 of 3  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com