North American
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 83 comments are related to the topic:
Bears @ Packers
Bears @ Packers
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 83
|
By:
why did they not challenge that?!
|
|
By:
Poor non challenge....he had the ball.
|
|
By:
strange
|
|
By:
That was def worth a challenge, Idiots
|
|
By:
1.3s, joke odds
|
|
By:
the Rogers information was key. it was very much appreciated, thanks airbag
|
|
By:
Anyone enlighten me why McCarthy chose not to challenge?
|
|
By:
As a Bears fan I could't believe he never challenged. Loving the fact he never did though
 The game has gone perfect for us Bears so far. We get the ball first in the 2nd half, heaven forbid if we score points from the first posession in the 2nd half then we will be in a great position to win in Green Bay! DABEARS!!! |
|
By:
7 pts 1.32, insanity
|
|
By:
I really want to see those odds get punished.
|
|
By:
lay it then.
|
|
By:
Only way for pack to win is rushing and ST
|
|
By:
Can't win JUST rushing against eight man boxes...need to find a short passing game with Wallace and MUST find some rush.
|
|
By:
 |
|
By:
|
|
By:
2 Defensive errors and 2 TD's for the Packs. Hope the bears offence can keep rolling in this 2nd half.
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
brilliant green bay
 |
|
By:
this has been a great game to watch
|
|
By:
i think the odds are great for green bay here
|
|
By:
still all up in the air
|
|
By:
Mmm, slept-in - pre-game small-medium back of Packers in danger, first pre-game back all year
 Now, Wallflower - "Write out 100 times, "don't back NFL straight, always always trade in-play""."don't back NFL straight, always always trade in-play" "don't back NFL straight, always always trade in-play" "don't back NFL straight, always always trade in-play" .................................... Ok, off to work now. Tough on Packers........Rodgers best QB in NFL, bar none. |
|
By:
wow
|
|
By:
By "off to work" no I meant get back to level
 , got there....... if only "real" work was as enjoyable |
|
By:
Who's your winner?
|
|
By:
Usual for me......I'm just trying to get a level green.......with enough to lay the first sub- 1.1 team. But to get there I usually favour a team.......obvious here.....Bears look the most likely by far, hard to see Packers winning
|
|
By:
Can see Bears getting turnover on next Packer possession
|
|
By:
bad call
|
|
By:
still think it was a bad call
|
|
By:
why?
|
|
By:
too risky......winning (don't need to go for it), defense on top, even if Pack scored well capable of scoring as well
|
|
By:
plus, bad field position to do it
|
|
By:
they're monopolizing the ball here
|
|
By:
packers a 1 man team
|
|
By:
Wisewords...you DO realise they have half a team missing..........and anyone would miss the best player in the league.
|
|
By:
.....beat me to it, grayhawk........I know all teams have injuries but Packers (and Patriots) have been particularly badly hit.
|
|
By:
Thank god for Fiorente in the Melbourne cup because I've done in a few quid on the Packers here in play.
|
|
By:
I had in my mind Packers as my sneaky favourites for NFC (to beat Seahawks in NFC championship game). Rodgers injury changes everything - may force them into wild-card position, makes things harder.
|
|
By:
Bears have been missing a lot of players lately too. It's been a hell of a performance from us so far. I never even expected us to cover the 10 point handicap tonight. Division is wide open. MASSIVE game v Detroit on Sunday.
|
|
By:
Strange for all Packer fans...having to get used to a back up QB playing for a length of time.
|