Forums

North American

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 141 comments are related to the topic:
So, would a London franchise work?

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 4 of 4  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 141
By:
Knight Rider
When: 12 Nov 13 18:29

You're kind of missing the point...... its just one of MANY issues that makes London different to locating in a US city.....it's another example of why it is far harder to make it feel like a "London" team, and part of the fabric of the city.

The season so short, being another; and then flying in would just add to the whole perception of it being US-based NFL "mercenaries" HAVING to play in London because it might be more profitable to the owners. It won't become part of the identity of the city - like sports teams (franchises) do in US cities (and Arsenal, West Ham, Liverpool, Celtic, and whoever are "part" of the cities in this part of the world).

What's also very unusual is that the likelihood of their local NFL base will be hardened supporters of teams from other cities, that they have supported for many years and not any London team.

I'm not saying problems can't be overcome - but I just don't think really is worth it - but what is absolutely certain is that there are many many issues that are unique to a possible London franchise that you'd wonder, why bother. For me it will be like death from a thousand cuts before it even got started.

But these issues combine to have the effect that it would not "feel" like a London team, with a "London" identity. This is really what the big big problem is when comes to marketing and continued interest when the novelty wears off.


So let me get this straight.  They would struggle to get people interested because if the players don't live in London year-round then it wouldn't feel like a London team with a London identity.  Yet there are already all these "hardened" supporters in the UK of teams from a different country in a city they've probably visited and have no connection to? Confused

If there's one thing we know from the NFL London games with people all wearing their team jerseys, and people on here saying "we" when talking about their favourite American sports team, it is that fans do not need a rational reason to support a team.  Many of them probably just started by liking the name or the kit or a certain player.  If the team is called London and plays in London then that puts them miles ahead of the other 31 teams when the next generation are picking which team to support.

By:
Wallflower
When: 12 Nov 13 22:53
Its just ONE of MANY reasons why locating in London is a far more difficult proposition than it being in another US city? I'm happy to list a lot of them if you like.

Do you honestly believe its just a geographical or logistical issue?
By:
Knight Rider
When: 13 Nov 13 02:07
No I understand that; if you go back over the thread there have been some informative posts covering all of the logistical issues.  I was simply countering the point you specifically made in that post and explaining why I think your logic is self-evidently contradicted by the fact that many Brits are "fans" of a team from a city they have never been to and have no connection with, so I don't see why they would snub a London team on the basis that it's not "London" enough for them because the players don't all live in the city throughout the year.
By:
therhino
When: 13 Nov 13 09:58
It's fairly split down the middle between those in the affirmative and those including me in the negative. For those in the former, does anyone actually think it is a better idea for the NFL to introduce a London team as opposed to Los Angeles or Las Vegas? Or even Portland or Birmingham (Alabama)?
By:
bigpoppapump
When: 13 Nov 13 11:45
London would obviously be a very different idea to a previously tried or entirely new US City. There's no way of proving if it's a better or worse idea, but going for something radically different is a way to make a step change (ie crack a whole new market, which is what this is all about) in a way that a new US city wouldn't be.  Clearly they try new US Cities every few years.  Sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't.


On the social connection thing - you're missing the big point.  The team has to exist first, before those intangibles you want to see can exist.  So it's just hot-air at this point to say an NFL team can never feel like it belongs in London.  Nobody knows until they try.  Build it and they will come...  ;)
By:
Whisperingdeath
When: 13 Nov 13 14:25
rhino,

Of course it is a better to introduce a London team than LA or Las Vegas!

The whole point is foreign dollars!  There is money outside the USA.  Look at the EPL and television money from Asia.

What do you naysayers think the point of a London franchise is?  To spread the great game of Gridiron for the masses to play?



$$$  TV money and International Corporate Sponsorship perhaps like F1 $$$
By:
therhino
When: 14 Nov 13 06:56
A better idea needs to be achievable Whispering. Gridiron achieving F1 status and revenue worldwide is a pipe dream, and using the EPL TV money as a comparison is more than a stretch. Plenty of money to be made in LA and Vegas, far less risk. No precedent for this in sports if it gets up, so it is a very bold move. Massive gamble, not sure the juice is worth the squeeze. I would continue down the road of sending a few games a year over to London, and work to get all the big local markets sitting idle active. Can always look at this in 5 or 10 years if there is still momentum, and if there isn't, it was never going to work anyway.
By:
Whisperingdeath
When: 21 Nov 13 16:54
Hi RhinoWink,

LA did have a Franchise but it went back to Oakland ( where it belonged! )  I saw a game there ( Oakland )! Lots of bad asses, reminds me of homeLaugh!  The fried chicken place in Oakland had a metal grille between customers and staff!  Me and my mate were well impressed with that, although where we come from it is the grille usually protects the customer from the staff!

A mate of mine was thrown out of a nite club head first down the stairs by the bouncers for fighting.  The bloke he was fighting with was so outraged that he asked my friend if he wanted to go back in and fight the bouncersLaugh!

I had to move my allegiance from raiders to Green Bay on sexual grounds as my gf is from Wisconsin!

A Las Vegas Franchise would be wicked for The rest of the World Team!  We could come over for a long weekend every now and again!  I am sure Treausre Island would front me tickets!
By:
therhino
When: 25 Nov 14 13:44
Good ole thread bump.

Is there still a push going on for a team in London or did it die before getting off the ground?
By:
Whisperingdeath
When: 25 Nov 14 14:44
How old are you Rhino?

Have you ever seen Rollerball? It's a portent.
By:
therhino
When: 26 Nov 14 00:05
I am 34. Nope, never seen it.
By:
Whisperingdeath
When: 26 Nov 14 06:53
Rollerball


Premise

In the film, the world of 2018 (referred to in the tagline as “the not too distant future”) is a global corporate state, containing entities such as the Energy Corporation, a global energy monopoly based in Houston which deals with nominally-peer corporations controlling access to all transport, luxury, housing, communication, and food on a global basis. According to the tagline, in this world, “wars will no longer exist. But there will be...Rollerball.”

The film's title is the name of a violent, globally popular sport around which the events of the film take place. It is similar to Roller Derby in that two teams clad in body armor skate on roller skates (some instead ride on motorcycles) around a banked, circular track. There, however, the similarity ends. The object of the game is to score points by the offensive team (the team in possession of the ball) throwing a softball-sized steel ball into the goal, which is a magnetic, cone-shaped area inset into the wall of the arena. The team without possession of the ball is defensive and acts to prevent scoring. It is a full-contact sport in which players have considerable leeway to attack opposing players in order to take or maintain possession of the ball and to score points. In addition, each team has three players who ride motorcycles to which teammates can latch on and be towed. The player in possession of the ball must hold it in plain view at all times.

Rollerball teams, named after the cities in which they are based, are owned by the various global corporations. Energy Corporation sponsors the Houston team. The game is a substitute for all current team sports and for warfare. While its ostensible purpose is entertainment, Mr. Bartholomew, a high-level executive of the Energy Corporation, describes it as a sport designed to show the futility of individual effort.
By:
therhino
When: 27 Nov 14 12:45
Thanks. I think...

So I take it the London movement had died a natural death and no one has anything to report?
By:
Whisperingdeath
When: 27 Nov 14 14:58
nothing to report!

the men with the money will deal with it. it is coming. have you read 1984 Rhino?


The point I was trying to make cackhandedly is this.  Back in the 1970's tv was still in black and white for many people!

Top players  ( UK footballers ) may have been earning a hundred pounds a week. Many earned above average wages, just.

By the mid 70's we saw American sportsmen earning hundreds of thousands a year ( certainly some more than $100,000 ).

If you look at America it is like a Europe but with one language.  Europe was far behind but the signs were there.  Eventually the best in Europe would want to compete with each other and small men with big ego's in Rome, Madrid, Paris, Munchen and London etc would want to be top men.  These top men in Europe have now had their way and they are squeezing the life blood out of the game. Fortunately they are not making money out of it yet!

NFL is not a sporting contest. it is a money making franchise. A bit like the Mafia splitting up territory if you like. No competition. If you visit places like Wisconsin everybody wears a Badgers or Packers shirt. Can you imagine walking through a high street of a small town where 1 in 5 or 1 in 10 wear the same football top?

Once these powerful men have their way and destroyed the local competition they will settle their differences in Europe. Eventually the great cities of the world will want a seat at the table. Tokyo, Mumbai, Berlin, Cape Town, Joburg, Bejing, Manilla, Rio....etc...who will want to miss out on the party?

If you think NFL is going to remain in North America I suggest you will join the dinosaurs. The writing is on he wall Rhino.

Not saying it will be easy but London would be relatively easier to set up because of common language and decent time differences. It may be a way off but they are testeing the market and it is screaming SELL US MORE! and that my friend is what it is all about...filthy lucre....The Yankee Dollar......coming to a place near you soon!

Watch Rollerball!
By:
CJ
When: 29 Nov 14 13:19
It's coming and it will be successful. The NFL is getting bigger and bigger by the year. Anyone who thinks it's a fad is living in cloud cuckoo land. We've been watching dud teams turn up in London for some time now and it's not killed the thirst for it.

The US really loved the early kick off ATL v DET, viewing figures were very good, & that way they get to show a breakfast game on the schedule. Personlly i love Green Bay, but i'd definitely buy a season ticket and run with London as a 2nd team.
By:
dlarssonf
When: 29 Nov 14 14:03
I think they NFL is getting bigger too but I must be living in cloud cuckoo land because I don't think a London team will ever happen. Been honest I also hope it never happens, would much rather all teams be us based
By:
TexassportsagentBuzz
When: 29 Nov 14 14:52
I don't think it will happen either unless they abandon the salary cap or a whole bunch of top quality British players suddenly appear.

Imagine how much they would have to pay someone of Calvin Johnsons talent level to move thousands of miles away from family and friends.

Maybe it will happen but it will be a 0-16 or 2-14 franchise for many years with half of the fans supporting the road team.
By:
CJ
When: 29 Nov 14 15:15
Top sports stars move to cities all over the world. Moving from NY to Seattle would be no different from moving from NY to London. I just don't see that being an issue. It's not like they'd have to travel by Ryanair.

London with an 80k stadium (which charges top $) will have the resources, no question.
By:
therhino
When: 30 Nov 14 03:48
Great thread. Great debate this one whatever camp you're in. Strongly in the negative, keep in the US. Watching Alabama vs Auburn right now, great game. I'll eat my hat if the state of Alabama couldn't support an NFL team, these people are feral for it.
By:
Whisperingdeath
When: 30 Nov 14 15:45
I am not a Septic but maybe Bama don't want an NFL Team!

College Football is huge and as well attended as NFL. They have an agreement to play on Saturday with NFL on Sunday.

The purpose of a London Franchise is not to spread a love for the game but a boost for some already rich people.  The naysayers seem to ignore this argument and focus on it will never happen, nobody will want to play for London, statistically it is impossible all of which are fatuous!

Why would the NFL come to London?

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ ( or maybe eurosWink )
By:
Knight Rider
When: 01 Dec 14 15:19
I don't think it's died a death just because it hasn't happened yet.  Here's an interesting recent article by Nate Silver (there are some related ones if you follow the links):

http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-nfl-should-expand-to-london-but-first-canada-mexico-and-la/
By:
DirkDiggler
When: 19 Dec 14 12:29
It may well happen but it will fail over time.
Page 4 of 4  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com