NY Jets @ NE Pats > Betfair Community

Betfair Community

Home › North American Forum › NY Jets @ NE Pats

Switch to Community Classic App Directory

North American

‹ back to topics

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.

These 62 comments are related to the topic:
NY Jets @ NE Pats

Switch to Live View refresh Post Reply

Post your reply

Page 2 of 2 • Previous | 1 | 2 | Next

sort by:

Show per page

Replies: 62

By:

Hank Hill When: 13 Sep 13 04:47

Pick to finish

By:

milla445 When: 13 Sep 13 04:48

That was ****g toilet. Can't believe I stayed up to watch that

This fight has been the highlight.

By:

SteadyPaceDontChase When: 13 Sep 13 04:51

Bollock s game waste of time and money **** g awful teams honestly Brady 2-0 fucmkmknows how.

By:

[x] These checkboxes suck When: 13 Sep 13 04:52

PMSL AT EJECTED

By:

SteadyPaceDontChase When: 13 Sep 13 04:53

QB for Jets is unbelievably badnwhats that 3 picks I will be laying them every game from now on and backing unders. Pub team

By:

[x] These checkboxes suck When: 13 Sep 13 04:57

arsed, up brains

By:

Beaniash When: 13 Sep 13 07:10

Sep 13, 2013 -- 1:28AM, Hank Hill wrote:

How much would the ransom be Bean?

DUNNO BUT HOPEFULLY THE KIDNAPPERS HAVE RELEASED THE VICTIMS BY BACKING THE UNDER

By:

Money On7 When: 13 Sep 13 07:45

After watching that display by the pats they shud be a 33-1 shot for the superbowl, the defence is average and brady has no1 to throw to. amendola and gronk have to return from injury which is fair enuff but edelman has done well this season because he is only player who can catch the ball in the heat but 2 years ago he was pretending to be tebow in a practice the week the pats played the broncos. i think he was 4th or 5th on the depth chart and was no more than a gadget man. other teams at the same price as them for the sb can afford for a wr and te to go down injured near the business end of the season and still cope whereas if it happens to either 3 of the pats targets there **** as it was clear to see last nite. also gronk and amendola are massivly injury prone. i really thinking where seeing the fall of 1 of footballs dynastys.

By:

d13phe When: 13 Sep 13 12:32

nice result

By:

Ted Brogan When: 13 Sep 13 14:21

Does anyone know what the highest price the Pats were matched at in-running last night?

By:

DirkDiggler When: 13 Sep 13 16:55

Geno Smith doesn't have a very strong arm, he's going to struggle in the NFL IMO. He doesn't have that quickness and burst for a running QB either. Compare him to RG, Wilson, CK - not close. It was said to be a poor QB class and we can now see why. First time I have seen him but his release is slow, that's not the same thing as taking a long time to throw it, which he did last night, it takes a while for his arm to come over.

Arm strength C.

Pocket awareness C.

Release C+.

Decisions making C.

Mobility B-.

Accuracy C.

By:

GoldCupWinner When: 13 Sep 13 17:01

I too I'm surprised that Tampa didn't manage to beat these. I thought they would be a decent team this year with Martin, VJAX and Mike Williams. I thought acquiring Regis would help them a lot on the D but I guess Freeman is still a very inconsistent QB.

By:

fixed When: 13 Sep 13 17:42

does it get any better than football anal-
ist dirkdiggler Cplusing the "release" of some random blackbox rookie QB ??

haha keep it coming

By:

DirkDiggler When: 13 Sep 13 17:57

Jets fan by any chance?

Does it get any better than your post:

what is 'Cplusing'? Are you drunk, or illiterate?

Why the need to put " " around release? Don't you know what release is? It's not something I have made up, it's an acknowledged football term. You're only making yourself look a t*t.

What's a 'random blackbox rookie QB'?

PMSL.

By:

GoldCupWinner When: 13 Sep 13 18:11

I meant to say Revis not Regis!

By:

Beaniash When: 13 Sep 13 18:11

Sep 13, 2013 -- 4:55PM, DirkDiggler wrote:

Geno Smith doesn't have a very strong arm, he's going to struggle in the NFL IMO. He doesn't have that quickness and burst for a running QB either. Compare him to RG, Wilson, CK - not close. It was said to be a poor QB class and we can now see why. First time I have seen him but his release is slow, that's not the same thing as taking a long time to throw it, which he did last night, it takes a while for his arm to come over.Arm strength C.Pocket awareness C.Release C+.Decisions making C.Mobility B-.Accuracy C.

TOM BRADY WAS THE 200TH PICK IN ROUND 6 WHEN HE GOT DRAFTED AND WAS ALMOST CUT, SO WATCHING 2 GAMES OF A YOUNG GUY AND ALREADY DISMISSING HIM IS A BIT HARSH.

By:

d13phe When: 13 Sep 13 18:34

i think the problem is last years QB class has set new standards.

it takes time to become an NFL QB - even the great ones!

the problem is that 4 freaks of nature (RG3, Luck, Wilson and CK) have completely rewritten the rules.

He had a tough night but hard to judge him this early imo

By:

Beaniash When: 13 Sep 13 19:26

LUCK IS TEXT BOOK SO NOTHING DIFFERENT BUT OTHERS WILL NOT BE AS DANGEROUS THIS YEAR AS MOST TEAMS WILL PREPARE FOR THEIR STYLE OF PLAY. THE READ OPTION QUARTERBACK WILL NOT LAST ITS JUST A PHASE

By:

DirkDiggler When: 13 Sep 13 20:14

TOM BRADY WAS THE 200TH PICK IN ROUND 6 WHEN HE GOT DRAFTED AND WAS ALMOST CUT, SO WATCHING 2 GAMES OF A YOUNG GUY AND ALREADY DISMISSING HIM IS A BIT HARSH.

>>>HOW MANY TOM BRADY'S ARE THERE? THAT'S A POINTLESS COMPARISON.

I RATED HIM ON WHAT I SAW AND IT WASN'T GOOD. I STAND BY MY RATINGS, I'M NOT SAYING HE CAN'T BE SUCCESSFUL, I RATED WHAT I SAW LAST NIGHT.

By:

DirkDiggler When: 13 Sep 13 20:17

If you're honest on what you saw last night with Smith, he fails the eye test. That's the first time I have watched him play an entire game, and no-one could say he had great tools.

By:

Beaniash When: 13 Sep 13 21:12

I NEVER COMPARED HIM TO BRADY I WAS SAYING THAT ITS A TAD BIT EARLY TO BE JUDGING THE KID. YOU HAVENT GOT ENOUGH OF A SAMPLE SIZE. EVERYONE IS ENTITLED TO A BAD GAME OR 2.

By:

Hank Hill When: 14 Sep 13 01:22

Ted - Pats highest matched was somewhere between 1.55-1.59 from memory.

By:

Ted Brogan When: 14 Sep 13 10:59

Thanks Hank!