|
By:
![]() |
|
By:
Gluten down 0-40
|
|
By:
SUPERBOWL MY A$$
|
|
By:
LOL GLUTEN .. I LIKE THAT NAME
|
|
By:
offensive PI
|
|
By:
JUST LIKE THAT ... OVERS LOOKING GOOD
|
|
By:
If Gluten bagels him this set I'll be seething
Trying to remember why I decided against the overs |
|
By:
YEEHAW!!!
14 to go Peyton!!! Good game. |
|
By:
Trying to remember why I decided against the overs
>>>Because 48 always seems more than it is. But I can never bring myself to back unders. |
|
By:
NICE!!!
![]() |
|
By:
It's very easy to wonder after one and a half quarter, usually avoid overs/unders altogether.
I do enjoy a bit of unnecessary roughness. |
|
By:
I find overs either cashes easy, or it never gets close when I back it.
|
|
By:
i smell pastry.
|
|
By:
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
By:
who gets the ball 1st in 2H
|
|
By:
Denver
|
|
By:
John Cleese would be proud of that funny walk.
|
|
By:
bagel point
|
|
By:
novak not showing any mercy
|
|
By:
Now I know how Schillachi feels
![]() |
|
By:
NOVAK ON IT .. GOOD JOB MURRAY TANKED TODAY. HE KNEW
|
|
By:
good game this
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
What do you think for game handicap? I think Baltimore +7.5 and +9.5 look good at 1.3s ish.
|
|
By:
Read an article in the racing post last year that in all overs unders markets in any sport the % of people who will always back overs in a bookies is 95% which is incredible.
|
|
By:
4 out of 10 home teams have won with this HT score since 2003.
|
|
By:
one of which was Denver, btw.
|
|
By:
they did it twice.
|
|
By:
![]() |
|
By:
DEN BRONCOS IND COLTS 0 7 14 17 21 17 24 23
DEN BRONCOS OAK RAIDERS 7 10 14 17 17 17 24 17 |
|
By:
manning will post a td on this drive
|
|
By:
backed Broncos -3
|
|
By:
Broncos out of jail big time
|
|
By:
was that incomplete |
|
By:
what a mistake.
|
|
By:
Clear drop
|
|
By:
yes.
|
|
By:
another fantasy irrelevant receiver
![]() |