|
By:
Way the game has gone. I thought Baltimore had a chance, but even at 14-13, NE seemed in control. That fumble was huge, but looking back, Baltimore were by far the better side. Now, 1.6 for SF looks tiny for mine but I've been wrong more than I've been right...
|
|
By:
if tom brady is the best qb in nfl history im brad pitt.
|
|
By:
49ers were around 2.1 at half time in the pats game...didnt matter who they were going to play they were never an odds against bet...crazy
|
|
By:
two pretenders who never really played anyone good got beat again.
its all about coming into the playoffs battle ready, not fresh imo |
|
By:
Home field advantage counts for less and less in the playoffs it seems to me.
This is the thing with NE, they're a weak champion every year almost because they're div is so crap, look at Balti, they've had to play Pitts and the Bengals twice. NE never really looked a patch on past teams. Balti getting 7 8 or even 9 was a steal IMO. ATL were lucky to make it that far. Both away teams were good enough to withstand the initial onslaught, and then their quality showed in the end. Could just about say the same for Seattle. |
|
By:
could be the last time we see the falcons in the playoffs for a while
esp if Tony G retires. |
|
By:
Not sure losing a top quality TE will determine if they make the playoffs next season..I think the competitive division they are in could keep them out...they were worthy favs for the south this season...Try and pick a winner next season in this division
Could say the same with a few other division except the afc east |
|
By:
Agree about the AFC East. Also it's hard to see the anyone other than the Broncos win the AFC West while the AFC South is between Texans & Colts, can't see the other 2 challenging there anytime soon
As for the other 5 divisions, you could make a case for every single team, even the Browns |
|
By:
Panthers for the nfc south please
|
|
By:
the saints for me with SP back
|