|
By:
And to think i backed them for the superbowl!
|
|
By:
come on eli lets go
|
|
By:
lucky steelers
|
|
By:
seattle look v good
|
|
By:
they are very good
|
|
By:
you don't need to tell me harry. my team
![]() |
|
By:
Will admit that i underestimated them, different proposition at home.
|
|
By:
what do you make of the soft schedule debate sudoku?
All I hear is atlanta soft schedule yet other teams who have lost games have lost to weak teams. |
|
By:
vikings still very much in this. Looks a good game sudoku
|
|
By:
still think the giants and the niners are the 2 to beat in the nfc
|
|
By:
True, although seattle always seem to cost me money (packers and pats) i'm taking a watching brief with them, love the way they play.
|
|
By:
TD buccs
I had them as favs today...had to back them on that basis...do not like the raiders |
|
By:
cruzzzzzzzzzzzzzz never seen a receiver have so much time..only welker gets open more than this guy
|
|
By:
seattle pretty soft schedule from here and 3 remaining divisional games all at home. But agree giants team to beat. Still don't believe in Atlanta
|
|
By:
even before than pick I rate ben more than eli
|
|
By:
AP having a decent half
|
|
By:
To be honest harry i pay little attention to schedules, this year has proved that any team regardless of personnel and previous results can beat anybody on their day.
Im not saying i pay no attention too it, but will probably only look at the last two/three games, and pay more attention to the length of week, and whether they have travelled home and away etc. I certainly at week 9, wouldn't be paying any attention to whether a team won or lost in week 1, although if at this stage a team has only beaten teams with losing records it should be noted. |
|
By:
yes agree with the last bit...just dont think atlanta are getting any credit because they have had a supposed soft schedule...pitts lost 2 games they should never lose (raiders titans) 49ers (vikings)
|
|
By:
Quite possibly, But you can only beat whats put in front of you, if you didn't deserve to be 7-0 you wouldn't be. I think what plays more on peoples minds for the falcons is that they have been previously notoriously bad in the playoffs.
|
|
By:
Peterson been outstanding for Vikes
|
|
By:
whoever is the leading NFL team people will always look for a reason to find a negative..same last year after lions were on a roll
|
|
By:
why do i keep betting overs in steelers games lol
|
|
By:
this is another team i have backed for the superbowl at big odds...win tonight and they should win the division with a win in one of the baltimore games...
|
|
By:
big ben still top 5 QB
|
|
By:
going into hiding if houston or chicago win the superbowl
![]() |
|
By:
They were huge value at 35's a couple of weeks ago, i knew i should have backed them.
|
|
By:
i backed both the ravens and steelers at the start of the week
one if not both could be a factor come January |
|
By:
this wilson is a dangerous return guy
|
|
By:
Despite cutlers woes i really like them.
|
|
By:
make that 2 of us Harry
and the Falcons |
|
By:
Joined: 01 Sep 08 | Topic/replies: 946 | Blogger: Sudoku_Junior's blog
They were huge value at 35's a couple of weeks ago, i knew i should have backed them. It may have been you trying to put me off when I mentioned them lol |
|
By:
|
|
By:
41s and 31s on denver during the tough schedule
![]() |
|
By:
Problem with the ravens, is they really need a home playoff game imo.
|
|
By:
not sure who it was then
|
|
By:
why does Goodell always look like a Hobo
does he not own a suit? |
|
By:
eli had blockers in front of him..should have ran it
|
|
By:
Joined: 01 Sep 08 | Topic/replies: 948 | Blogger: Sudoku_Junior's blog
Problem with the ravens, is they really need a home playoff game imo. or someone other than lee evans catching balls in the endzone...ravens at home are a nightmare for any team..still think webb being out could catch up with them.. |
|
By:
Nice flag haha
again to save Giants ffs |
|
By:
he could have easily run that in , instead almost gives an interception. wtf!
|