Oct 29, 2012 -- 12:40AM, rubyisgodinthesaddle wrote:
told you!!!!!!!....****g incredible!
LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL 










Oct 29, 2012 -- 12:40AM, noland2_ wrote:
£££££££££££££££££££££££££££









Oct 29, 2012 -- 12:50AM, Beaniash wrote:
Oct 28, 2012 -- 11:40PM, noland2_ wrote:£££££££££££££££££££££££££££
what price Dallas go then 





Oct 29, 2012 -- 12:50AM, Beaniash wrote:
Oct 28, 2012 -- 11:40PM, noland2_ wrote:£££££££££££££££££££££££££££



Oct 29, 2012 -- 12:53AM, HARRY22 wrote:
Joined: 23 Mar 08 | Topic/replies: 13,204 | Blogger: RMB ©'s blog£50k burnt on Dallas when it wasn't a touchdown. Does this happen oThe packers game last month was worse than that finish
Dont remind me
Oct 29, 2012 -- 12:53AM, HARRY22 wrote:
Joined: 23 Mar 08 | Topic/replies: 13,204 | Blogger: RMB ©'s blog£50k burnt on Dallas when it wasn't a touchdown. Does this happen oThe packers game last month was worse than that finish
Reminds me of a rowing race during the Olympics when people were backing the wrong race right into 1.01.
Oct 29, 2012 -- 12:54AM, HARRY22 wrote:you didn't need faster pics tbf..you just needed to see his hand on the white paint and you still had chance to get a nice price on giants
and you needed to know the exact rule which alot of people betting on this obviously didn't(including myself), which is quite funny