Forums

North American

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
trickynic123
03 Jan 12 17:54
Joined:
Date Joined: 18 Jun 07
| Topic/replies: 7 | Blogger: trickynic123's blog
It is conceivable they could have 2 playoff games at home - to a flagging houston then NE/pittsburgh........ i'm not the biggest fan of flacco but he has proved in 2 games this season against the steelers that he can get it done when it matters, ray rice hitting top form and apart from one game against the chargers, there D is as stout as ever. Out of the lot, New Orleans the worst price....... in tremendous form no doubt, but a tricky tie at home to detroit, away at san fran and then away at the packers....... thats even just to get to the bowl!

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 19
By:
orioles
When: 03 Jan 12 19:18
I can't have Flacco in the post-season.

If I was looking for a little value, I'd look at the Giants at 25s. I like their D (particularly their pass rush) and Manning has shown flashes of real talent in a nicely balanced offense.
By:
horse9
When: 03 Jan 12 20:08
Best bet for me is laying Pats for the AFC Champs.
No defence that bad should be able to win a championship and even though they're likely have homefield advantage throughout Jan I wouldn't be surprised if a Steelers, Ravens or even the Bungals went to Foxboro and turn Brady and co over.
On the outrights I can't see any big errors, I like the Bungals in Houston this weekend so maybe the 80/1 on them is big, play offs always throw up a surprise or two, but the winner will have to go through Green Bay at some point which explains the prices
By:
orioles
When: 03 Jan 12 20:35
I agree about New England. They won't give leads away and come back like they have recently.
By:
anton_chigurh
When: 03 Jan 12 23:25
Took the Bungals out at 200 myself because I could see them with a Houston -> Pats run and are capable of winning both. The Pats price is like a rerun of 12 months ago...except I think they were actually a better team twelve months ago!
By:
anton_chigurh
When: 03 Jan 12 23:26
On the Ravens... I just can't be depending on Flacco in the playoffs. Though I'm not red on them neither am I green.
By:
db1974
When: 04 Jan 12 09:24
Dunno about Bengals. I don't think they are good enough really.

7 matches against playoff teams in regular season - 7 losses
9 wins against teams with combined record of 43-85

Whatever about beating the Texans next weekend, I can't see them beating 2 of Ravens/Steelers/Patriots just to get to the Superbowl
By:
d13phe
When: 04 Jan 12 15:04
think it may be a year to soon for the bengals but they are an exciting team with a dependable D and an exciting offense.  If there is any team that could surprise it is them.
By:
The Prophet Of Profit
When: 07 Jan 12 12:55
Flacco wont win a superbowl.  Save your money.
By:
Princes Purple Guitar
When: 08 Jan 12 22:58
houston will stop flacco and co...there is the value..do it the hard way....defence wins and they have a fit team bar TE and can rack up points once they work their way into a game...2nd best defence...just need to stop reed and do a number on Lewis, but it is a closer match up than people think imo...Cool
By:
The real Moaner
When: 16 Jan 12 17:55
Can one below par performance against a very good defence really make them such outsiders? Considering they were 9 at the start of the playoffs and two of the three favourites are out their odds look huge considering the NFC sides remaining.
By:
grayhawk
When: 16 Jan 12 18:12
Was thinking the same myself Moaner....yes they struggled to create much offence yesterday but the D that they will be going up against next week is nowhere near as good......will have no fears travelling to Foxboro neither.
By:
d13phe
When: 16 Jan 12 18:48
I may be wrong but the odds in the SB market don't matchup with the current match odds which are simply ridiculous

I think Houston have obviously been underestimated and Denver overestimated
By:
The real Moaner
When: 16 Jan 12 19:10
Aside from Baltimore, value on NE seems good as the current odds would look to imply odds of around 1.7 in the Superbowl!

Against San Fran or NYG, the Pats would be sub 1.6 max and possibly sub 1.5.
By:
The Prophet Of Profit
When: 16 Jan 12 22:16
They were -9 against them during season.  Take off 3 points for home field + NYG are playing much better than they were then so id take off enough 3 points (at least) to reflect that.  Id say itd be a -3 line for the superbowl, which is probably around 1.66 on the moneyline.

Personally, id go -2.5.

Against niners Id go -3.5.
By:
CrazySnake
When: 19 Jan 12 02:47
Implied odds via the SB market has SF49ers 2.45-2.50 for the SB and NYG 2.08. I simply don't understand that...
By:
d13phe
When: 22 Jan 12 18:10
My superbowl book hopes that Baltimore are the value

New England are 2.16 yet I rate all 3 other teams above them
By:
San Quentin
When: 22 Jan 12 18:33
same here just cannot belive the prices at the mo
By:
Zippie..the..hippie
When: 22 Jan 12 18:38
Some stats for you Raven backers or the long odds on Pats backers

The Pats have not beaten a single team with a winning record this year

The Ravens have playes 7 teams with a winning record and beaten 6 of them

Hmmmmm

Can't get my head around this game cos I think Flaco is simply terrible, the man is a clueless headless chicken with no touch but they can run the ball and the Pats D is average at best.

Depends how injured Ed Reed is imo

Giants are the bet of the night imo, 49's are not that good and played an easy schedule

The G men will be too good on D and are looking decent on the O too now
By:
d13phe
When: 22 Jan 12 18:43
I think the ravens odds underestimate how good the Houston D is
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com