|
By:
stupid challenge
|
|
By:
dang sorry that is under 34.5! yikes
|
|
By:
no way they overturn that depsite what Mike says
|
|
By:
ball rolled on the floor
|
|
By:
maybe then its a fumble but dont reckon
|
|
By:
That's a 2st down all day ffs!
|
|
By:
*1st
|
|
By:
And I'm on Chicago!
|
|
By:
reckon this could get messy pretty quickly
|
|
By:
surely thats a 1st down
|
|
By:
pfffft
|
|
By:
right call imo
|
|
By:
actually seeing that angle....3 down
|
|
By:
will they go for this?
|
|
By:
kinel! pts up and sont go for the 1st down for a yard!
|
|
By:
bit of bromance action going on in the c4 studio
|
|
By:
they were in their own half armchair
no chance |
|
By:
Has Beaniash been by yet to tell anyone who not to back?
![]() |
|
By:
Chicago playing well tbf so far. Wouls hav e been easy to drive like sheight after GB romped for their first
|
|
By:
beanish will be on shortly after FT is called to declare that he has been watching the game with (imaginary) friends and had of course backed the winner
his post will also be in BLOCK CAPITALS as well |
|
By:
well quite happy with my unders here could be just 7 points first quarter
|
|
By:
I lokked at unders but think this game could go Td mad at soem point...
|
|
By:
yes but the longer it stays low the better the chance to green up
|
|
By:
oh aye lad...there's always that!
|
|
By:
sitting here eating cream cheese and salmon bagels for nothing but the sake of it ffs! Such a pig at this time of year. I'd like Chicago to make it a great day
![]() |
|
By:
dunno why i backed overs tonight , im usually an unders man
![]() ![]() |
|
By:
someone trying to back unders at 2.44 now for small, I backed 3.75 wondering when to start laying
![]() |
|
By:
oh ffs
|
|
By:
mon the Chic
|
|
By:
I dont know too much American Football but Green Bay at 1-7 look a lousy bet at the moment.
|
|
By:
Neither do I, and I concur!
|
|
By:
yeah you wouldnt wanna be sweating on them for a huge payout, well you would because you could lay it
but no 1/7 dont look too inviting |
|
By:
Thing is, Chicago have played great but still don't look like getting a TD, whereas GB have got one with the minimum of fuss, and are likely to respond immediately
|
|
By:
no more points before half time please
|
|
By:
They do not look half the side I watched earlier in the season.
|
|
By:
plenty of injuries wee eck
|
|
By:
The GB of the first 5 minutes weren't bad!
|
|
By:
One things for sure, I'd rather have my money behind a Rodgers offence than that of a nervous QB who's hardly played since 2002 and has already thrown one int.
Chicago doing well on the ground tbf. |
|
By:
watcha milla
yes rodgers should get this done but I would not want to be lumping on at 1/7! |
|
By:
Seen it so many times in my short time as a watcher. Teams plays great, gets a lead and then dip. Other side respond but dont capitalise...only for the other team to wake up ad go clear
|