North American
I'm sure big ben will play but not sure about willis
Harrison is suspended
I think this will be a test too far for the 49ers and I really fancy the steelers to win quite easily
I think the difference will be the red zone offenses and the 49ers don't have enough firepower to keep score with the steelers who have some major offensive weapons these days
had nothing to lose going foe it.
Dec 20, 2011 -- 4:19AM, chingachgook wrote:
they should've tried the 55 yarder in the 1st halfhad nothing to lose going foe it.
Oh, but did you not see the gallant TD effort?!
Dec 20, 2011 -- 4:20AM, Beaniash wrote:
only 1 team in it now
he meant san fran here as well as you can clearly see..
Dec 20, 2011 -- 4:29AM, SCHNUCK wrote:
was clearly out, how can you say different?
wasn't clear at all..jesus even the comms couldn't decide..how can you say otherwise
Dec 20, 2011 -- 4:31AM, Dr.Cypionate wrote:
Dec 20, 2011 -- 4:29AM, SCHNUCK wrote:was clearly out, how can you say different?wasn't clear at all..jesus even the comms couldn't decide..how can you say otherwise
well was clear as day to me, that his foot was on the line.. and nothing to say other wise means it can not be over ruled!
Dec 20, 2011 -- 4:32AM, SCHNUCK wrote:
Dec 20, 2011 -- 4:31AM, Dr.Cypionate wrote:Dec 20, 2011 -- 4:29AM, SCHNUCK wrote:was clearly out, how can you say different?wasn't clear at all..jesus even the comms couldn't decide..how can you say otherwisewell was clear as day to me, that his foot was on the line.. and nothing to say other wise means it can not be over ruled!
had that been called a td on the field it would have stood also..not clear either way.
Dec 20, 2011 -- 4:34AM, Dr.Cypionate wrote:
Dec 20, 2011 -- 4:32AM, SCHNUCK wrote:Dec 20, 2011 -- 4:31AM, Dr.Cypionate wrote:Dec 20, 2011 -- 4:29AM, SCHNUCK wrote:was clearly out, how can you say different?wasn't clear at all..jesus even the comms couldn't decide..how can you say otherwisewell was clear as day to me, that his foot was on the line.. and nothing to say other wise means it can not be over ruled!had that been called a td on the field it would have stood also..not clear either way.
yes thats correct but it wasnt so it was clear that it wasnt being over ruled!
Dec 20, 2011 -- 4:29AM, SCHNUCK wrote:
was clearly out, how can you say different?
i never said it was clear it was you..which it wasn't was the point
Dec 20, 2011 -- 4:36AM, Dr.Cypionate wrote:
Dec 20, 2011 -- 4:29AM, SCHNUCK wrote:was clearly out, how can you say different?i never said it was clear it was you..which it wasn't was the point
well it was clear after looking at the replay... his foot was in touch so it wasn't going to be over ruled!
Dec 20, 2011 -- 4:35AM, Beaniash wrote:
hold up ... we might be in here
you need to stfu and steelers might get back in it!
Loks like I got me money back
20 Dec 11 01:58
Joined:
04 Aug 10
| Topic/replies: 225 | Blogger: Lebovsky47's blog
guys take pitt under 18.5 @ 1.88+ if you can, cracking bet, big Ben is limping around, no way he will be able to finish the game, dont see steelers scoring here at all, SF still didnt allow rushing TD this season which is amazing stat
well they did score 1 FG which went in only just
The leaping flag was critical, but they played a good game and deserved the win - they're not going to win it all though.
Dec 20, 2011 -- 7:09AM, Beaniash wrote:
£££££££££££ - UNDER.
SELF CONGRATULATING AGAIN!
you're so predictable
