Pittsburgh steelers at San Francisco 49ers > Betfair Community

Betfair Community

Home › North American Forum › Pittsburgh steelers at San Francisco 49ers

Switch to Community Classic App Directory

North American

‹ back to topics

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.

These 331 comments are related to the topic:
Pittsburgh steelers at San Francisco 49ers

Switch to Live View refresh Post Reply

Post your reply

Page 7 of 9 • Previous | 1 | ... | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | Next

sort by:

Show per page

Replies: 331

By:

chingachgook When: 20 Dec 11 04:17

hand was down out of bounds before the 2nd foot its clear ffs

By:

chingachgook When: 20 Dec 11 04:17

miss suisham please

By:

ArmchairIdiot When: 20 Dec 11 04:17

it always goes to sh!t no matter how well PS drive early

By:

judorick When: 20 Dec 11 04:17

great

By:

GoBallistic When: 20 Dec 11 04:18

Should go for it here

By:

Beaniash When: 20 Dec 11 04:18

least rothy is looking better ... just need to keep it close

By:

SCHNUCK When: 20 Dec 11 04:18

wow nice FG there!

By:

chingachgook When: 20 Dec 11 04:18

fookin prick
my luck summed up in 1 kick

By:

milla445 When: 20 Dec 11 04:19

Hmm would have loved a miss but also needed the points for Pittsburgh - I'm sure Suisham's time will come later on

By:

Beaniash When: 20 Dec 11 04:19

ada-boy

By:

chingachgook When: 20 Dec 11 04:19

they should've tried the 55 yarder in the 1st half
had nothing to lose going foe it.

By:

ArmchairIdiot When: 20 Dec 11 04:20

ahh well....there went the next score TD bet! Steelers 3 pts closer though.

By:

Beaniash When: 20 Dec 11 04:20

only 1 team in it now

By:

milla445 When: 20 Dec 11 04:20

SF would have had the ball with a second or so on the clock close to midfield - I wouldn't have gone for it either

By:

ArmchairIdiot When: 20 Dec 11 04:21

SF will drive and get a TD guaranteed now

By:

ArmchairIdiot When: 20 Dec 11 04:22

Dec 20, 2011 -- 4:19AM, chingachgook wrote:

they should've tried the 55 yarder in the 1st halfhad nothing to lose going foe it.

Oh, but did you not see the gallant TD effort?!

By:

ArmchairIdiot When: 20 Dec 11 04:23

here we go....

By:

Dr.Cypionate When: 20 Dec 11 04:25

steelers D gone to sleep

By:

ArmchairIdiot When: 20 Dec 11 04:26

Predictable stuff

By:

ArmchairIdiot When: 20 Dec 11 04:27

Beaniash never called it though

By:

Dr.Cypionate When: 20 Dec 11 04:27

he's won on the unders so he didn't say anything..

By:

SCHNUCK When: 20 Dec 11 04:27

cant see how this can be over ruled.. should stand short

By:

Dr.Cypionate When: 20 Dec 11 04:28

Dec 20, 2011 -- 4:20AM, Beaniash wrote:

only 1 team in it now

he meant san fran here as well as you can clearly see..

By:

Dr.Cypionate When: 20 Dec 11 04:28

theyll over turn this in keeping with the whole of this game

By:

SCHNUCK When: 20 Dec 11 04:29

na this never gets turned over!

By:

Dr.Cypionate When: 20 Dec 11 04:29

amazing!

By:

SCHNUCK When: 20 Dec 11 04:29

was clearly out, how can you say different?

By:

SCHNUCK When: 20 Dec 11 04:30

lovely touch down

By:

milla445 When: 20 Dec 11 04:30

Nice play call - never saw that coming

By:

Dr.Cypionate When: 20 Dec 11 04:31

Dec 20, 2011 -- 4:29AM, SCHNUCK wrote:

was clearly out, how can you say different?

wasn't clear at all..jesus even the comms couldn't decide..how can you say otherwise

By:

SergeantMarcel When: 20 Dec 11 04:32

That play had me fooled haha. great play

By:

SCHNUCK When: 20 Dec 11 04:32

Dec 20, 2011 -- 4:31AM, Dr.Cypionate wrote:

Dec 20, 2011 -- 4:29AM, SCHNUCK wrote:was clearly out, how can you say different?wasn't clear at all..jesus even the comms couldn't decide..how can you say otherwise

well was clear as day to me, that his foot was on the line.. and nothing to say other wise means it can not be over ruled!

By:

ArmchairIdiot When: 20 Dec 11 04:32

SF defence has PS rattled. They don't believe anymore.

By:

SCHNUCK When: 20 Dec 11 04:33

ben's no huddle

By:

Dr.Cypionate When: 20 Dec 11 04:34

Dec 20, 2011 -- 4:32AM, SCHNUCK wrote:

Dec 20, 2011 -- 4:31AM, Dr.Cypionate wrote:Dec 20, 2011 -- 4:29AM, SCHNUCK wrote:was clearly out, how can you say different?wasn't clear at all..jesus even the comms couldn't decide..how can you say otherwisewell was clear as day to me, that his foot was on the line.. and nothing to say other wise means it can not be over ruled!

had that been called a td on the field it would have stood also..not clear either way.

By:

Beaniash When: 20 Dec 11 04:34

i was more confident with the under than the match winner but i did choose the steelers was a 50/50 match oh well

By:

SCHNUCK When: 20 Dec 11 04:35

Dec 20, 2011 -- 4:34AM, Dr.Cypionate wrote:

Dec 20, 2011 -- 4:32AM, SCHNUCK wrote:Dec 20, 2011 -- 4:31AM, Dr.Cypionate wrote:Dec 20, 2011 -- 4:29AM, SCHNUCK wrote:was clearly out, how can you say different?wasn't clear at all..jesus even the comms couldn't decide..how can you say otherwisewell was clear as day to me, that his foot was on the line.. and nothing to say other wise means it can not be over ruled!had that been called a td on the field it would have stood also..not clear either way.

yes thats correct but it wasnt so it was clear that it wasnt being over ruled!

By:

ArmchairIdiot When: 20 Dec 11 04:35

Aint been watching this game long, but i love the Medenhall (sic) fella.

By:

Beaniash When: 20 Dec 11 04:35

hold up ... we might be in here

By:

ArmchairIdiot When: 20 Dec 11 04:36

game needs to catch fire