|
By:
Books probably got filled in at -6, -10 looks about right with only one team now needing to win this after Philly blew the no.2 seed.
|
|
By:
These casinos are pretty quick at reacting to situations, probably very few bets taken and now the Eagles can't get the #2 seed Bears have nothing to play for.
Shame it could ruin one of the best match ups of the season but you'd have to expect the Pack to walk this now, in fact giving up 10 it's still a play could easily now be a 25+ point blowout. Had my eyes on the TD shirts on this one for a while, but not only do I need it to be competitive and the weather to be OK, Sporting seem to have cottoned on to Packers games by pricing in the mid 300s. 320-340 v Giants last week, it had made up halfway through 2nd quarter and finished up 522 |
|
By:
if atlanta follow suit and lose to the panthers , isn't the no.1 seed up for grabs ?..... long shot but stranger things have happened, ask plilly
|
|
By:
According to nfl.com, Bears need both Falcons & Saints to lose to have a shot at the No1 seed.
They will know before they take the field against the Packers whether it is still possible or not as the other 2 teams are playing at 6pm |
|
By:
Both atlanta and saints wont lose..bears are gonna be 2seed...they may as well rest cutler as the packers D will murder him imo.....saints conference record edges the bears so its not gonna happen imo.
|
|
By:
I think the Bears will probably have there usual starters but withdraw some throughout the game.
Peppers/Urlacher for example i doubt will play more 15 snaps. |
|
By:
The 340 quote last week was also due to giants receivers being all 80s with smith now gone for season
|
|
By:
No point in the Bears turning up as no one can stop
KUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUHN! |
|
By:
Is that the guy who kept doing a klinsmann dive over patriot defenders who couldnt tackle?kept making 3rd downs on these little runs and hurdles lol
|
|
By:
153k waiting @ 1.17 , some1 fancies green bay from the look of it
|
|
By:
Bears Bears Bears
|
|
By:
10.5 looks a little big to me
|
|
By:
no chi starters inactive, other than earl bennett
|
|
By:
No bet on this game but will be a shame from a viewing perspective if the bears go easy although I don't expect it whatsoever
|
|
By:
GB a little short here.
I'd fancy us to beat the Bears at Lambeau even if Chi needed to win, but the current price is ridiculous |
|
By:
Green bay do have the ability to beat themselves also
|
|
By:
Come on Cheeseheads
![]() |
|
By:
BEEEEAAAARRRRSSSSSSSSS
|
|
By:
KUHNNN
|
|
By:
So good on those slant moves
|
|
By:
I still think GB will end up winning this, although I'm a bears fan.
|
|
By:
pass protection was good on that drive, encouraging
|
|
By:
Surely a few interceptions for Mr Cutler today
|
|
By:
you are going to get smashed by Matthews many more times over the years Forte
![]() |
|
By:
C'mon Bears
|
|
By:
they go through the starting line ups and it just reminds you how much tallented Packers are missing on D.
Nick Barnett Morgan Burnett Cullen Jenkins Jonny Jolly Ryan Pickett Marcus Neil Brad Jones Going to have so much depth next year if we keep hold of everyone. |
|
By:
TURNOVER
|
|
By:
fkin awful driver
|
|
By:
Once again Packers freezing when they NEED to win
|
|
By:
Nuggett....the crack is that Mike Neal is gonna be a beast.
|
|
By:
hi can anyone tell me if james jones is playing tonight,aint seen him,so wondering if i missed that he's injured?..thanks
|
|
By:
how the **** have you dropped thst!!!
|
|
By:
Lol... almost there... he is gonna get picked a treat today
|
|
By:
certainly had a good rookie season
|
|
By:
Tellboy....never saw him on the inactive list on NFL.COM
|
|
By:
Think so Tellboy
|
|
By:
Panthers absolute mugs if they don't take Andrew Luck
|
|
By:
thanks gray and ross..hope he gets a catch soon then..
|
|
By:
That is some great play from the Bears offensive line on back to back plays
|