lets not forget the 1st down on the 4th and inches play...he never got there but they called it wrong on the field so couldnt overturn..if it was called change of possession on the field they probably wouldn't have overturned that either.
lets not forget the 1st down on the 4th and inches play...he never got there but they called it wrong on the field so couldnt overturn..if it was called change of possession on the field they probably wouldn't have overturned that either.
Got to agree, was watching it on an American channel and they clearly showed the ball hitting the ground, i know i laid a bit more on the Saints after seeing it, whats the point of TV replays if they ignore the obvious.
As for the pass int, well that was just a horrific homer biased call.
Got to agree, was watching it on an American channel and they clearly showed the ball hitting the ground, i know i laid a bit more on the Saints after seeing it, whats the point of TV replays if they ignore the obvious. As for the pass int, well that
ball touched the ground...you cant class control as having it trapped against his leg
Wasn't a superbowl won with a catch trapped against a helmet, I'll answer that, it was.
HARRY22 26 Jan 23:39 ball touched the ground...you cant class control as having it trapped against his leg Wasn't a superbowl won with a catch trapped against a helmet, I'll answer that, it was.
the ball wasnt on the ground. doesnt matter if he traps it against his** as long as its not on the ground. with this one the ball was fairly clearly on the ground.
the ball wasnt on the ground. doesnt matter if he traps it against his** as long as its not on the ground. with this one the ball was fairly clearly on the ground.
Since when wasn't the ball allowed to touch the ground, if the ball is secured it can touch the ground, did it bounce - no, did it move as he hit the turf - no.
Since when wasn't the ball allowed to touch the ground, if the ball is secured it can touch the ground, did it bounce - no, did it move as he hit the turf - no.