Forums

North American

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Green Beard
03 Jan 10 17:44
Joined:
Date Joined: 08 Oct 08
| Topic/replies: 7,473 | Blogger: Green Beard's blog
last time i made a thread like this it was dallas who was 2.5 or so and straightlined to 1.01 :)

this time, its all about smacking in a mammoth lay of dallas tonight against eagles . . . eagles offence is rolling well and pass defence has been pretty strong if i remember so will hopefully be able to stop those pesky 3rd down romo to witten conversions :|

personally think offences are roughly the same, but fancy eagles defence far more . . massive lay of dallas for me

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 38
By:
Green Beard
When: 03 Jan 10 18:43
last thread got 5 posts when it was proved right

so might hedge my big back of the eagles with a buy on the spreads for posts in this thread ;)
By:
Horangi.
When: 03 Jan 10 18:46
Dallas defense is better than the Eagles. Plus Cowboys have more experience in the team.

EZ win for the home side in front of 110,000+.
By:
regular joe
When: 03 Jan 10 22:47
Wouldn't want your spread bet about posts to come as badly unstuck as the lay of Dallas, Green, so thought I'd give this a bump. (I was on Philly too, sadly)
By:
Max Cady
When: 03 Jan 10 22:54
have philadelphia troubled the score keeeper yet?
By:
SwindonBoy
When: 03 Jan 10 23:03
now thats a straightliner to 1.01 ouch
By:
casemoney
When: 03 Jan 10 23:04
Conkers smashed thread..
By:
Max Cady
When: 03 Jan 10 23:15
no doubt he traded out.
By:
SwindonBoy
When: 03 Jan 10 23:19
24-0
By:
jeany
When: 03 Jan 10 23:20
*cough*
By:
bohemond
When: 03 Jan 10 23:27
I made 1 prematch call today on phil Taylor - it was a good shout but a much better price could be achieved in running.

GB is an active trader - despite making a shocking pre match call there is a good chance he made money on this match or at least did not get beat

By and large pre match shouts or predictions are over rated - reacting to events on the field and trading accordingly is a far more lucrative business
By:
regular joe
When: 03 Jan 10 23:31
He is very unlikely to have made a profit on this game if he started off with a "mammoth lay" of Dallas. I backed Philly myself and from the word go they looked awful. Dallas flatlined to 1.01.
By:
bohemond
When: 03 Jan 10 23:34
depends on your level of firepower and the speed in which u can sense the way the wind is blowing

in any 24-zip game i would expect to make money regardless of my starting position
By:
Lionrock
When: 04 Jan 10 00:21
LOL u just got to laugh!!!

he's a f**king GENIUS if he turned a 'mammoth lay' of dallas into a profit in that game. Give over.

he made a prematch call, nothing wrong with that, but FFS there's no way he didn't lose.
By:
Onionss
When: 04 Jan 10 00:23
Gotta laugh. Just have to.
By:
SwindonBoy
When: 04 Jan 10 00:31
LOL
By:
Onionss
When: 04 Jan 10 00:39
ttt
By:
Mr Lizard
When: 04 Jan 10 00:43
:^0

you fkin idiot..now i know why you were utterly seeething on the dallas IR thread :^0
By:
Mr Lizard
When: 04 Jan 10 00:45
bohemond 04 Jan 00:34
depends on your level of firepower and the speed in which u can sense the way the wind is blowing

in any 24-zip game i would expect to make money regardless of my starting position



only a" SUPER TRADER" would claim such a thing
By:
Green Beard
When: 04 Jan 10 00:55
dire dire pre match call, eagles didnt turn up, but as boh has it, im an active trader, and it was obvious fairly early on all was not well in the eagles camp

sorry to p*ss on peoples fireworks, but i greened in this match, and as boh said, any 24-0 match, as a momentum trader, id expect to nail


but yep, eagles just didnt show, mcnabb looked seething as well, a lot of poor drops and defence never really got pressure to romo and he played a great match, really did control it well
By:
Max Cady
When: 04 Jan 10 00:56
pmsl
By:
Onionss
When: 04 Jan 10 00:57
FFS Green, be honest for once. Everyone loses now and then, just admit it was a **e bet. Why lie about the green?
By:
Green Beard
When: 04 Jan 10 01:01
it was a **e bet, but im not lying about the green :(

my pre match positions are smaller than what im allowed in in play, so yes i put a big "pre match" bet on eagles, but in running i had to use alot of my ammo, but i did reverse

sorry :(

i just have to tell it straight
By:
Onionss
When: 04 Jan 10 01:02
fair enough
By:
Mr Lizard
When: 04 Jan 10 01:09
"UNLUCKY" :^0 :^0
By:
Hayden
When: 04 Jan 10 12:27
It's not rocket science to understand how you could develop an all green book in such circumstances tbf , maybe the doubters would be surprised at the stake relationship between the original bet and the reverse bet on Dallas but that's someone's personal trading strategy and whatever works for them , if the problem is not believing the individual then that's another story altogether and my only comment then would be who cares anyway , it's an anonymous forum so anything goes.
Personally I believe everything that's posted or should I say that I can be bothered to read simply because it matters not a jot whether it's true or not. , the only a/c to take seriously should be your own.

Good luck to all for the play-offs.
By:
Saluting Darren Lockyer
When: 04 Jan 10 12:55
fair points,but all i can say is that if you can make money out of an original mammoth lay that flatlines to 1.01 then you either have a crystal ball or your original mammoth lay isn't very much at all.
By:
Hayden
When: 04 Jan 10 13:11
or your initial in-play wager is so significantly higher than your pre-match staking strategy , it's all relative.
By:
Saluting Darren Lockyer
When: 04 Jan 10 14:23
exactly, rectifying an initial bad lay can be done but usually involves wagering a lot of money especially in a case like this. I think gb,bless hi socks ,just likes winding people up sometimes !!
By:
db1974
When: 04 Jan 10 14:34
It's just another way of saying that you chased your initial losses and got them back.

Nothing especially clever about it
By:
awesome impact
When: 04 Jan 10 15:30
How could you green up on a pre match back of the Eagles or a lay off Dallas last night????? Dallas scored a TD on their first possession so you could only possibly get out in the RED.
By:
Hayden
When: 04 Jan 10 15:34
Obviously you could quite easily shift to Dallas green and then green up later when the train is nearing it's destination , it's all in the staking differential but anyone adopting this strategy will probably admit it's not without it's alarms on occasions.
By:
jeany
When: 04 Jan 10 16:11
lmfao what a tool.
By:
Mr Lizard
When: 06 Jan 10 23:37
ttt
By:
Mr Lizard
When: 10 Jan 10 02:25
bump
By:
SN00P
When: 10 Jan 10 02:35
P.M.S.L R.O.F.L.M.A.O and so forth.
By:
casemoney
When: 10 Jan 10 03:21
HAYDEN 04 Jan 13:27


It's not rocket science to understand how you could develop an all green book in such circumstances tbf , maybe the doubters would be surprised at the stake relationship between the original bet and the reverse bet on Dallas but that's someone's personal trading strategy and whatever works for them ..

does this strategy work in all trades ?

Could u lend me some money and send me ur ebook please ?
By:
casemoney
When: 10 Jan 10 03:23
post ya bets ,we know it can be done just like to see how u do it ,,
By:
Mr Lizard
When: 24 Jan 10 23:39
A pleasing thread

strange that this guy (like all super traders) never loses on the in running threads but when posting his bets pre game they bomb :^0
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com