North American
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
As we all know the general public no nothing about gambling.
The 'Vegas Pro' rule is that anytime 70% or more of the money is going with one side, you should look at the other team with a view to betting them.
The last three weeks has seen this theory go 7:3 ATS
It is early this week but already we have three sides being strongly backed by the public who we should look at seriously to oppose.
Houston 77.1%
Denver 77.1%
San Diego 75%
I will update over the course of the week as events unfold.
The 'Vegas Pro' rule is that anytime 70% or more of the money is going with one side, you should look at the other team with a view to betting them.
The last three weeks has seen this theory go 7:3 ATS
It is early this week but already we have three sides being strongly backed by the public who we should look at seriously to oppose.
Houston 77.1%
Denver 77.1%
San Diego 75%
I will update over the course of the week as events unfold.
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 31
|
By:
where do you get these figures?
|
|
By:
Google the thread title
|
|
By:
I think Denver will lose SU anyway!
|
|
By:
San Diego 78.5%
Houston 76.3% Denver 75.5% I cannot trust the Texans for sure! |
|
By:
I keep hearing : " Vince Young & The TITAN"S "
|
|
By:
I like this approach jimmy. Keep up the good work!
|
|
By:
My figures have Jacksonville S/U for a win.
|
|
By:
crikey
the numbers have expanded!! San Diego 79% New England 76.2% Houston 75.8% Denver 74.4% New Orleans 74% maybe we need to go against 5 this week!! |
|
By:
when do you think the best time to "take the reading" is? Is it not to early now?
I note that the week just gone had 2 other teams on 70% plus by kick-off - Minnesota and Cincinati (one of which covered, the other didn't). |
|
By:
hi red
i normally take a final look on about the saturday night. |
|
By:
i did not realise about minnesota and cinci.
what time did you check those? |
|
By:
checked on Sunday not long before kick-off. I viewed this site - maybe it's the wrong one or not that same as the one you are looking at? The figures seem to fluctuate quite a bit which is why I asked it there is an optimum time in your opinion to check?
http://www.wagertracker.com/consensusPicks.aspx?week=18&sport=NFL&expertsonly=false |
|
By:
i use wagerline.com
|
|
By:
Here's last week's final results with Cinci nowhere near 70%
http://contests.covers.com/Handicapping/consensusPick/daily-consensus-picks.aspx?sport=1&date=11/29/2009&select_type=0 |
|
By:
San Diego 76.6%
New England 74% Houston 71.3% Denver 71.1% Minnesota 70.1% could be a big five time opposer this weekend! |
|
By:
put it in an acca!
|
|
By:
final check and only 4 now to be opposed as Denver slipped below the 70% mark:
San Diego 75.5% New England 74.3% Minnesota 70.4% Houston 70% The Houston shout is tough as well as they are bang on 70%, is the rule 70% or above 70%.................... We also need to find a time each week for a cut off. Anyway, for information and use them how you wish! |
|
By:
pretty gutted denver has fell behind as its one off my bets.
Id imagine a sunday around 4pm would be a cut off point surely not too many more enter after this, Also shouldnt be a problem on getting bets off. Also is their any over under bets above 70% as doesnt it work on that also? |
|
By:
tough call to oppose ne but i can see mileage in the others
|
|
By:
as of now, just NE (74.01%) and SD (74.78%) are over the 70% mark
just for info |
|
By:
i know, i fancy ne -4.5 tho!! i can't back miami @ _4.5 just wouldnt feel right!
|
|
By:
Have to go for a Colts win today, Titans improvement is overrated and Colts with that unbeaten record. 1.4s seems value.
|
|
By:
:0
|
|
By:
i should have followed the tips here, luckily traded out!
|
|
By:
going well so far!
|
|
By:
shirley cleveland can't pull it off as well :0
|
|
By:
3 out of 4 with one to play. Good stuff.
I went for Cleveland and Miami |
|
By:
spooky
|
|
By:
Wiseguys pounded Washington late,the hayseeds got eaten in that one.
|
|
By:
wish i had that acca now!!
|
|
By:
Wish I had followed in on all 4 rather than just 2!
|