Now there was a real character of the game,ever remembered for his betting exploits and his savaging on live TV of John McCririck and Luke Harvey outside the weigh room.
RIP.
Now there was a real character of the game,ever remembered for his betting exploits and his savaging on live TV of John McCririck and Luke Harvey outside the weigh room.RIP.
I spent a few hours in his company at killarney about 15 years ago.
He was with a top UK based jock that was friendly with one of the guys I was with and we hit the bar with him.
Barney wasn't a drinker but came in to us between races .
It was funny to watch the punters who recognised him follow him around the ring while the bookies pretended to quiver or jokingly usher him to the next joint.
I wouldn't say I knew one iota more about him after the day than I did before tbh.
He was a complex character Frank. I spent a few hours in his company at killarney about 15 years ago.He was with a top UK based jock that was friendly with one of the guys I was with and we hit the bar with him.Barney wasn't a drinker but came in to
A Man who made racing a lot more interesting when he had a horse in a race.He was a great judge of a young horse.When you look at the horses that he sent to the Dickinsons.I can remember my uncle telling me that Barney had 100000 on one of his own horses in a bumper at Galway one day and the horse lost.That was back in the 1980 S.He sent over a couple of horses to Galway in 1999 with one of them doing the business with a young Jamie Spencer up.Racing needs characters like Barney and Harry Findlay more then ever now.He made racing pay.RIP Barney the world is a poorer place without you. And so the wild Geese fly heading for home again.
A Man who made racing a lot more interesting when he had a horse in a race.He was a great judge of a young horse.When you look at the horses that he sent to the Dickinsons.I can remember my uncle telling me that Barney had 100000 on one of his own ho
@ punchestown: "that" interview is legendary but it was also nasty at times and showed a man who believed in his own egotistic hubris. He "won" the argument through belligerence and bullying, not any cogent argument.
@ punchestown: "that" interview is legendary but it was also nasty at times and showed a man who believed in his own egotistic hubris. He "won" the argument through belligerence and bullying, not any cogent argument.