The internet of (Irish racing) things

What a long way we have come from the days of de paper(various).

As mainstream as it is the atr site for past races is probably the singular most important site,suppose everyone has their own sites/methods but think a lot goes into how to read them(proof enough Logical Song had a lack of "fighting qualities" in past races).

The greater the success of a site makes it only last a matter of time,it goes like "pricewise" and either reluctance to lay or "bad value" at the bottom of the pyramid is the nett result

ATR site has lot of good blogs and gary o brien picks a few winners at the irish tracks, looking at the form the racing post has been my fav,
sometimes i have a look at DRAWBIAS.COM for the draws mainly, does have sire stats and some other things.

Interesting topic...Scouse Tony is your man here, once he returns.

itcanbedone • February 19, 2017 12:27 PM GMT
The contents of this post have been hidden for this blocked user.    [Manage blocked users]

Dozy Mandy is a right good man as well - with bated breath we await his resurrection

Anyone follow the above post?  Presumably typed on a phone.

I like Pat Keane in the Examiner myself. Not afraid to express an opinion and he clearly bets. Think I read from him once that he doesn't bet in handicaps which I found interesting. Ruby's column in the same paper is useful as well in that while you might not want to outright follow the tips, you definitely get a strong sense of whether he rates a horse or not. Think you could see he thought Sizing John was okay from his newspaper article, and the way he added to that on TV would nearly have made him a bet. (I didn't bet him). On the other hand, if you were a long term reader of his column, you'd get the sense something like Haymount was always going to struggle beyond a certain point.

Think the Indo coverage has improved since Johnny Ward went there, he portrays well the narrative of the season unfolding and his enthusiasm comes accross.

Gary O'Brien and Kevin Blake are excellent broadcasters, I don't have RUK but have streamed online the odd Wednesday night Kempton meeting and think the lads do everything the RUK guys do a little better; their advice/opinions are far more practical and grounded in reality. You'd here RUK pundits making out after the event that they had made a case for a Beckett 12/1 shot maiden winner that was 26.0 on this that nobody would ever, ever bet.

ATR stable tours are a good read as well, as are Hugh Taylor's columns but I don't bother much with them. I like the way Tom Segal uses his intuition rather than what is just there in the form book, I don't really read it any more, but if I did, those are the times I would bet him.

With a strong editor, I think Chapman can be a huge success on terrestrial, if he brings the kind of game  he brought when doing those longform interviews with Cecil, he is excellent. He has the highest ceiling of anyone on that broadcast. he lets himself down a bit at times, he was trying to put his arm around Colin Tizzard yesterday post-race with predictable results, he needs to cut that **** out.

Used to like Nick Mordin, for all he was a bit of a crackpot and used to extend his theories to extremes. I wonder what he is doing now?