Sometimes, I despair

Pity about ya, you haven't the manners to apologise to Workrider for the vile ccomments you made at him.

Maybe not that "wildly inaccurate" concerning iesnare, i honestly don't know as my tech isn't great but a read of this certainly raises questions.

www.geegeez.co.uk/iesnare-how-bookies-are-spying-on-you-from-your-own-computer/

Calm yourself, Pa, there is no point getting yourself into a state.

Opening post removed.  Guess we cannot mention u know what bookmaker on here atm, even if only discussing how reception is manned!

Wonks has brought everything on himself, if you pause for thought about what he has said to me on here over time, you will understand.  Not that you have ever shown yourself to be capable of unbiased thought on any subject.

With regard to iesnare, see my comments on the 'successful gamblers thread'. Removing it and blocking it, as I have done , is probably a bigger red flag to bookies than just leaving it run.  Once you get beyond the paranoid hyperbole, what it monitors is fairly harmless (unless you run multiple accounts).

I noticed an mpsnare reference flicking bottom left on the Betfair page I was referencing --main menu , horse racing probably .  Does that mean that Betfair or someone else is using that type of program to monitor betting activity ?  I have always assumed that anyone who uses oddschecker WILL be monitored , I think 3 of my accounts were closed / restricted within one particular week , 3 different bookies , but coincidence got my attention .  That was years ago though , I assumed there was information swopping , but maye it was this snake in the woods .

I dont operate multiple accounts , so no skin off my nose .  But when the bookies themselves represent the ultimate bean counters I reckon they are a bit holier than thou in restricting people who back winners .