Forums

Irish Sports

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
dj876
31 Jan 15 22:10
Joined:
Date Joined: 01 Jul 10
| Topic/replies: 6,249 | Blogger: dj876's blog
Surely this relationship doesn't act as a great advocate for the integrity of racing?

It's public knowledge that Rupert extended himself with a mortgage for agricultural land.

So how good does it look when PP are going top price by a couple of points on Vautour all winter for the Arkle etc. (numerous examples)

Most on here know how the racing system promotes handicapping et (buyer be aware etc) but surely this relationship is toxic for the perception of passive viewers and the promotion of the sport ??

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 33
By:
workrider
When: 31 Jan 15 22:26
I find myself agreeing with you , it could be classed as passing inside infomation , and we all know the penalty for that...
By:
BigRob1
When: 31 Jan 15 22:47
Couldn't agree more .

A jockey being employed by a layer ,, doesn't make any sense at all.
By:
frank60
When: 31 Jan 15 22:52
This relationship as you refer to it D.J. is going on now for a good few years , and for the next 6weeks there will be plenty more of it,  is it right? i was in PP at around 12.30 today and Ruby was being interviewed and felt it would take a special performence to beat Morning Run ;  many punters would welcome this type of info. ..But i see where your comeing from.
By:
norn iron
When: 31 Jan 15 22:57
FRANK   I DIDNT HAVE BET BUT THOUGHT LYRIC THEATRE WAS GIVEN NICE school AND ONLY HIT LAST TWO COULD OF WON ?
By:
dj876
When: 31 Jan 15 23:01
Frank,

If you're reliant on hearing a jockey's "impartial" opinion on a race you're in serious trouble.

There could be a discrepancy in to the quality of the information relayed to the customers and to what is relayed to his employer (PP).

Whatever the truth is, the opaque relationship is not healthy for the perception of the passive punter.
By:
frank60
When: 31 Jan 15 23:04
A very bad mistake at the last Norn ;but i dont belive she would have beaten the winner,   LYRIC THEATRE did run a cracker NORN to be fair.
By:
frank60
When: 31 Jan 15 23:09
I like to think i have an open mind when it come to gambling DJ,
By:
frank60
When: 31 Jan 15 23:26
Grin
By:
padlock
When: 31 Jan 15 23:56
Ruby,bit big for his boots imo
By:
neill d
When: 01 Feb 15 00:08
Good point by the OP well-made.
By:
applehunter
When: 01 Feb 15 00:25
Ruby loves money.
By:
SoYouThink
When: 01 Feb 15 08:22
I would agree with this - the optics to the ordinary punter don't look great.

I'm sure without Ruby Walsh, Mr. Power would still be able to his hands on info that the punter would be last to hear about but as I say, the optics don't look good.
By:
workrider
When: 01 Feb 15 10:19
When I'm in a pp shop and hear the opening remark  ,I spoke to Ruby this MORNING and asked him what he thought about his mount in this , it could be well into the afternoon at this stage , he said etc etc ..Surely this firm are then forearmed , and can ajust prices accordingly ...
By:
tony57
When: 01 Feb 15 11:16
I take another view....I wouldn't believe a word that came out of his mouth were his pp contract is concerned..remember a lot of it is form and your eyes tell you what has gone on..if anyone belives ruby would give pp anything that would help a punter..they don't know ruby..
By:
Rocketfingers
When: 01 Feb 15 11:33
Deary me, so hold on what you're saying is Tony you actually know Ruby Walsh personally ????
By:
tony57
When: 01 Feb 15 11:38
only a the forum clown would see something that's not there?
By:
Rocketfingers
When: 01 Feb 15 11:59
tony57 01 Feb 15 11:16 Joined: 13 Oct 10 | Topic/replies: 4,137 | Blogger: tony57's blog
I take another view....I wouldn't believe a word that came out of his mouth were his pp contract is concerned..remember a lot of it is form and your eyes tell you what has gone on..if anyone belives ruby would give pp anything that would help a punter..they don't know ruby..

This implies you know him Tony and people who have a different point of view on the subject to yours do so because they don't know him !! So you now don't know him?
By:
tony57
When: 01 Feb 15 12:30
just for someone with ltd intelligence as yourself..take a look at some of ruby comments regarding punters????his lack of respect for us..would at least make anyone who is remotely interested in the game think twice before believing ruby when passing comment for a bookie?i don't have to know him to know his track record..(just to help you he has said such things like I don't care about punters on tv)..do you understand now what I was saying?..of course you do..but you try to twist it as something that is not there...clown!!!
By:
Rocketfingers
When: 01 Feb 15 12:48
So you admit you lied and you don't know him, cool just wanted clarity on that soft lad, cheers Happy
By:
insideinfo
When: 01 Feb 15 12:51
tony your comment would lead people to believe that you are implying you know ruby! if you had of given these examples of rubys disdain for punters in your original post then you may have avoided the (obvious) cunfusion.
By:
CheltenhamRoar
When: 01 Feb 15 13:06
If he says he fancies an odds on shot avoid it like the plague
"Willie will be very disappointed if it loses" is a favourite of his
By:
tony57
When: 01 Feb 15 13:29
couldn't disagree more inside info..at no time is it implied that I know the man.
By:
tony57
When: 01 Feb 15 13:30
chelts makes just one point of the crap that comes from the yard..and the trainers mouth..
By:
Rocketfingers
When: 01 Feb 15 13:45
Yes you have, it is clear you don't have the minimal iq required to understand what you are saying or trying to say soft lad.
By:
tony57
When: 01 Feb 15 13:46
Silly
By:
insideinfo
When: 01 Feb 15 14:09
well tony even if its not implied it certainly comes across that way..the word imply would mean that you have intentionally led us to believe you know him,which maybe you have not.
By:
tony57
When: 01 Feb 15 14:12
fine..
By:
Rocketfingers
When: 01 Feb 15 14:26
Caught lying soft lad was, glad he was outed by the forum Cool

Next on the hit list is Pa !!
By:
tony57
When: 01 Feb 15 14:54
Laugh
By:
Santry
When: 01 Feb 15 20:27
Ruby Walsh's deal with PP simply should not be happening. Another example of how an unhealthy relationship between bookies and the racing insiders is developing is the amount of bookies reps giving "advice" to punters though the media. You couldn't make it up-the people who have a vested interest in taking your money telling you what to back!.
By:
padlock
When: 01 Feb 15 20:44
Agree with tony,ruby has no time for punters or common courtesy ,I asked him about his ride on ouninpohja in the county hurdle years ago and he completely ignored my civilised question,arrogant git imo.
By:
thegalwayman
When: 01 Feb 15 22:21
He didn't lick it off a stone padlock.

McCoy at W H, Moore Betfair. All the same.
By:
callitasucit
When: 01 Feb 15 22:26
Same....except McCoy is not a pr1ck.
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com