Irish Sports
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
To be fair, with the line Magnier has, many people could do it. Interesting stuff, would like to see if it would stand up over a bigger sample size, as if it goes on, it has likely been this way for a long time as both AOB and Wachman are at the game for the nuts of twenty years.
you've compiled some good circumstantial evidence there Wildman, but some would say it has just been O'Brien making an even slower start than normal and punters cottoning on to that with Wachman team being quicker to break and having one of the stronger strings in Irish racing.
you've compiled some good circumstantial evidence there Wildman, but some would say it has just been O'Brien making an even slower start than normal and punters cottoning on to that with Wachman team being quicker to break and having one of the stronger strings in Irish racing.
Show More
The Cork race showed that not to be the case.
I was amazed at all the money being for The Islander and Supposing being friendless,they hadn't gone a furlong before I knew why.
I was amazed at all the money being for The Islander and Supposing being friendless,they hadn't gone a furlong before I knew why.
By quicker to break i mean in terms of Wachman making a better start to the season I should clarify.
We'll look on with interest anyway and might be an angle into a few races for some.
We'll look on with interest anyway and might be an angle into a few races for some.
Opening post removed again.
Craven spineless Betfair,Neil d can confirm nothing wrong with the opening post.
They seem now to remove my threads as a matter of course.
Craven spineless Betfair,Neil d can confirm nothing wrong with the opening post.
They seem now to remove my threads as a matter of course.
Maybe it was the mentioning of an individual Wildman? I don,t know,think they try to avoid a possible repeat of the Cork bookmaker episode.
its a miracle hes allowed post at all ......with the kind of stuff hes been posting over the years......outrageous doesn't even come close in describing some of it.....imagine telling people Mullins was leaving a gobber like Meade win races.....
That's very dismissive Paulie, wasn't it more about not getting in each others way in the bumpers in the early part of the season is the way i read it. A fair few have rubbished his thoughts before as they are too close to the bone and certainly not suited to being up in print.
Not sure about the opening post,think Neill is right and it's a very small sample size.
Not sure about the opening post,think Neill is right and it's a very small sample size.
Ive seen him write some dangerous stuff pa.....particularly about one individual..... all of it completelely unproveable.....and most of it not even accurate.....
Fair enough Paulie with regards that,The Cops and Robbers heads got some land all the same to balance up your 16.26 statement.
I never libelled any bookmaker ya doting old codger ya.......but then again you know that already....yet another in a long line of dangerous statements without any basis whatsoever...
ya remind me of Dan in kilnaskully......i can see ya up in the counter in the middle of two village idiots who hang on your every word......both of them thinking you are a genius while you hold court.....the reality is of course that anybody with a brain can see you for exactly what you are......
ya remind me of Dan in kilnaskully......i can see ya up in the counter in the middle of two village idiots who hang on your every word......both of them thinking you are a genius while you hold court.....the reality is of course that anybody with a brain can see you for exactly what you are......
Yes you did,you quoted odds on something you had no business quoting odds on.
That's why you are much more circumspect now and when you are challenged you back down,once bitten twice shy.
That's why you are much more circumspect now and when you are challenged you back down,once bitten twice shy.
Would you ever talk through your mouth and give yer hole a rest for once in yer life.......I quoted odds on something I had no business quoting odds on.....what the fukk does that mean......
enough of the talking in riddles Shiite that you continuously go on with......spit it out....but you wont of course......
enough of the talking in riddles Shiite that you continuously go on with......spit it out....but you wont of course......
Ever tried tipping a winner gobshee.......you had some nerve chasing off people like Stamford bridge who knew their stuff inside out......and then come on yourself tipping about 2000 losers in a row......all ew and all unplaced......
yerself and wilddanfromborneo are well met.......
yerself and wilddanfromborneo are well met.......
As I told you before I have a substantial profit from my selections on this forum since Jan 1st 2014. If you are prepared to have a €5000.00 bet on that fact I will be happy to oblige. Otherwise don't try to discredit me. You are a very angry person who is in urgent need of treatment..
Paulie you hardly expect me to repeat what you said.
In those days you were Robo,Bobbybocala,Donegal Publican,Dublin Barman amongst others and your speciality was hounding some posters with your trademark finish of " get into bed ya fool ya "
You know the Meade Mullins axis was true as your mob were the beneficiaries of that policy,ye overdid it on some occasions sure weren't ye the original combined force.
In those days you were Robo,Bobbybocala,Donegal Publican,Dublin Barman amongst others and your speciality was hounding some posters with your trademark finish of " get into bed ya fool ya "
You know the Meade Mullins axis was true as your mob were the beneficiaries of that policy,ye overdid it on some occasions sure weren't ye the original combined force.
Jaysus the Wachman/O'Brien/Magnier axis,attention seeker needs new material.
Loyal old Pa still defending the "Mullins being afraid of Meade's bumper horses".
BF are tightening up,I'd say you're in your final furlong Borneo,it will be a blessing in disguise for you,a miracle those few acres have survived with what some of the stuff you have written on here over the years.
Loyal old Pa still defending the "Mullins being afraid of Meade's bumper horses".
BF are tightening up,I'd say you're in your final furlong Borneo,it will be a blessing in disguise for you,a miracle those few acres have survived with what some of the stuff you have written on here over the years.
Where did i say "Mullins being afraid of Meade's bumper horses", i didn't,and wondering why you are just making it up.
My views towards Mullins/Meade are clear if you took the trouble to read the thread a bit more carefully.
My views towards Mullins/Meade are clear if you took the trouble to read the thread a bit more carefully.
Pa,I read your thoughts on that topic for at least 6 months. Wildman, yourself and the usual cronies were the only ones who were not laughing at it. I think they contested 16 consecutive bumpers at one stage during the season,start of the season parameter was an after-time addition when it was pointed out to ye that Mullins did not have any bumper runners during the period (one in six weeks).
Well forget last season so due to illness,in previous years say September up to late November i do think there was/is/and will be a lot of avoidance between them. Whether right or wrong i,m entitled to think so as you are with the opposite without your belittling attitude which you would never get on my part.
There is not a remote semblance of modesty attached to the portrayal of these theories as stated facts without any mitigation or mention of the level of subjectivity, hearsay or dramatisation attached. Your condescending vanquishing of other poster's threads on here after the event also confute your above statement.
Don,t be so two faced, you totally ignored derogatory remarks made towards a posters wife when you were on a thread at the time,that says a lot to me.
Never stated any of these theories as fact and they are just my thoughts, not much modesty on your part to just ridicule them rather than proving they are wrong.
Never stated any of these theories as fact and they are just my thoughts, not much modesty on your part to just ridicule them rather than proving they are wrong.
dj876. you have nothing to offer to this forum.. You tip up odds on shots all the time, I cant remember the last time you provided us with a winner. In fact, I remember you putting up a 1/10 loser. You are a complete toss pot. Why don you leave this forum and stop intimidating and bullying decent posters.
With respect Meade and Mullins contesting 17 consecutive Bumpers is as conclusive a refutation of a proposed hypothesis that you can get
As for this theory,it acknowledges a basic connection which is equivalent to the tripe you would hear in your local bookmaker's office, personally I would be astounded if JM had a bet on the previously mentioned races, the winnings would not pay his gardener's wages so I doubt he would be wasting any time with the logistics of it.
As for this theory,it acknowledges a basic connection which is equivalent to the tripe you would hear in your local bookmaker's office, personally I would be astounded if JM had a bet on the previously mentioned races, the winnings would not pay his gardener's wages so I doubt he would be wasting any time with the logistics of it.
What part of the year did they contest 17 consecutive bumpers? It certainly wasn,t up to the 1st dec, was it?
Instead of your smart arse comments, dj, give us a winner?
so would you wr if you were doing the night shift for a british tabloid....lol
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539