Forums

Irish Sports

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 123 comments are related to the topic:
dundalk 9.15

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 3 of 4  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 123
By:
kingrat
When: 10 Jan 14 23:34
a ton will help with yre grand children tuition,not much i know but its a start wildman.do u want to face me down?
By:
wildmanfromborneo
When: 10 Jan 14 23:34
This is the third time Ozymandius has been caught like this,he is the cyber version of the pencilman.
By:
wildmanfromborneo
When: 10 Jan 14 23:36
Kingrat you have run away from bet after bet here,can you tell us the amount and the price.
By:
pa lapsy
When: 10 Jan 14 23:36
Nothing to apologise for,read my 22.54 post slowly,bf suspended every market they had at before 21.21pm,fact, odds available from two books at that time whether available or not as said don,t know,fact is rat couldn,t name i of the 2 books and make what you want of that.
By:
wildmanfromborneo
When: 10 Jan 14 23:37
Pa Lapsy is too much of a gentleman to go for the kill,the fact is he caught the two fantasists.
By:
Ozymandius
When: 10 Jan 14 23:39
Stop stirring Borneo, you know well I backed him!

That grand is available if anyone wants to call PP and ask them what time they suspended the market.
By:
Ozymandius
When: 10 Jan 14 23:40
, odds available from two books at that time whether available or not as said don,t know,

Just phone PP and ask them.  Simple.
By:
wildmanfromborneo
When: 10 Jan 14 23:43
You don't bet,there is no grand and the collateral damage is pleasing.

Poor Kingrat tells yet another lie but gets caught because Ozymandius was inventing again.

We are still waiting for the hapless Kingrat to tells us his bet.
By:
Ozymandius
When: 10 Jan 14 23:44
collateral damage ?

You do your dough on a 2/1 hoss, I stick up a winner at 11/4 and 5/1.

That's the bottom lineWink
By:
pa lapsy
When: 10 Jan 14 23:45
No point in ringing them to ask did kingrat have a bet,they won,t answer you but you would be giving me a grand ozy.
By:
Ozymandius
When: 10 Jan 14 23:45
Goodnight gents.
By:
wildmanfromborneo
When: 10 Jan 14 23:48
The difference is I backed the horse,you didnt back the 5/1 winner because you don't bet plus the result was already in.

Kingrat gone very silent maybe he has forgotten the question.
How much did you have on and at what price.
By:
kingrat
When: 10 Jan 14 23:48
absolutely hilarious,these old farts have lost it!LaughLaughLaugh
By:
Ozymandius
When: 10 Jan 14 23:49
I am not referring to Kingers bet pa and you know it.  The fact is the market was open , you tried to claim that it was impossible for me to have paced the advised bets.  You are wrong, why not simply apologise?

You can read the Specials forum if u want further independent  confirmation that PP kept their market open late tonight.
By:
wildmanfromborneo
When: 10 Jan 14 23:50
Same question for Ozymandius.
How much did you have on and at what price?
By:
kingrat
When: 10 Jan 14 23:51
relax wildman.dont take it personal.WinkLaughLaughLaugh
By:
pa lapsy
When: 10 Jan 14 23:54
Never said it ozy and conceded two books were on oddschecker after,whether odds were available or not check my initial 22.54 post again, rat hadn,t a clue what was happening and got so embarressingly found out.
By:
wildmanfromborneo
When: 10 Jan 14 23:55
This is like Olivia OLeary asking the corpulent Mark Killalea the same question over and over again and getting no answer.
Like Paxman asking Howard the same question over and over again and getting no answer.

For one last time and its directed at Ozymandius and Kingrat.

What bet did ye have and at what price?
By:
Ozymandius
When: 10 Jan 14 23:58
So Pa, the accusation was in no way directed at me, is that what you are saying?
By:
freddiek
When: 11 Jan 14 00:01
ozy is the master at evading questions.
By:
wildmanfromborneo
When: 11 Jan 14 00:02
I will make it easy for you.
I am saying you had no bet and neither had Kingrat.
Ye are floundering,ye are well able to question others on here but when asked the only relevant question you engage in this filibustering.

What started as a good night for ye has turned into a humiliation.
By:
pa lapsy
When: 11 Jan 14 00:03
You very possibly did back him ozy,kingrat didn,t as he couldn,t name one of the two books and the boooms were in aid of heaven knows what but very probably small willy syndrome.
By:
freddiek
When: 11 Jan 14 00:03
he just clocked what the boys in the know were saying on the CBB thread and stuck it on here to make himself look clued in.

not the first time hes done it.
By:
freddiek
When: 11 Jan 14 00:05
post yer bet Ozy. yer man peter from the man utd thread does it all the time.

don't see why u cannot. maybe yer embarassed u only had a fiver on or something
By:
Ozymandius
When: 11 Jan 14 00:05
11/4 and 5/1 Borneo, as advised here.  PP actually went to 7/1  at the death apparently.  it was an unusual eviction mechanism and I guess the casual punter didn't fully understand the twist and got burnt, hence the weight of money for the more obvious favourite.
By:
kingrat
When: 11 Jan 14 00:06
look wildman!u did yre bollix,got it wrong yet again.the shrewdies on here marked yre card,but u just dont listen.yre a stubborn geezer that has never learnt.and u will do it again.lashing out at the formites on here is not going to do yre pocket any good.take a good look at yre self and be honest.believe me,it will save u money and you might even be able to send money to yre grand children to send them to a good school.do something about yre own faults instead of ranting and raving at the big bad world that u have no control off.jesus christ i should be a counsiler and charge for that type of adviceLaugh.
By:
wildmanfromborneo
When: 11 Jan 14 00:08
There were no bets.
The relevant questions will not be answered.
They are both admirers of Rocketfingers another one allergic to betting.
Roadrunners only friend here is Kingrat.

Tonight has just been confirmation of what I knew about these lads for ages.

I lost on Carried but won on the night in Dundalk and did it with real bets.
By:
roadrunner46
When: 11 Jan 14 00:25
why would you bet CARRIED (FR69) when it has taken the horse 11 races to get a rating of 74, papas way(FR73) has only had 4 races and been rated 73. thats 4lbs better than the fav was officially rated by the handicapper on first ratings. evidence was all there in the formbook, that papas way was more than likely a better horse, and unexposed. my FIRST RATING THEORY, can be useful in separating two closely matched horses in a race.
By:
pa lapsy
When: 11 Jan 14 00:30
Shure RR you probably had half the country on him after your bold statement on the first page that he had a favourites chance.
By:
roadrunner46
When: 11 Jan 14 00:34
doesnt know how to read form, just helping out with a few pointersLaugh find it very helpful not to watch the races tooLaugh
By:
roadrunner46
When: 11 Jan 14 01:05
january 28th 2012

1st forceful appeal 15/8 first rating 84 / OR 79 on day

2nd titan triumph 11/4 first rating 70 / OR 78 on day

forceful appeal was backed all morning form 11/2 into 15/8 fav.

thats when discovered the FIRST RATING THEORY, can be useful sometimes. only reason mentioned the fav tonight in that race
was because usually the form comparisons will revolve around the fav, work the form in relation to the fav, not all the time tho
By:
callitasucit
When: 11 Jan 14 01:13
roadrunner46  • January 10, 2014 6:40 PM GMT 


CARRIED looks to have a favs chance tonight


roadrunner46  • January 11, 2014 12:25 AM GMT 


why would you bet CARRIED (FR69) when it has taken the horse 11 races to get a rating of 74


CrazyCrazyCrazyCrazyCrazyCrazyCrazyCrazy

I have no problem with lads changing their minds......but changing it after the race is quite the novelty.
By:
roadrunner46
When: 11 Jan 14 01:52
he needed bit of confidence to lose his money on the favWink you thought was recommending the favLaugh
By:
callitasucit
When: 11 Jan 14 01:59
RR, I can fuc*in guarantee if the fav won, you would have been on here boooooming. I will always respect someone who can form an objective opinion, back it, and stand by it. If you think you are right, back yourself. If it transpires that you were wrong, so be it, you had the belief in your reasoning and had a go. If you are getting it wrong more often than right, maybe then give it up. I have no problem with any of that. But you, you have never put up a pre race, pre any event opinion or bet, but consistently pipe up in the aftermath to proclaim yourself as the second coming.
By:
roadrunner46
When: 11 Jan 14 02:10
shawkantango ran a blinder the other day, 7th course win at southwell, thankfully had put that on all my different multiplesLaugh there was need to put that tip on here because ive told everyone one on this forum what a great track that is for betting specialist's
been laughed at all the time.Laugh ran in 57.84 fast 0.16 been told by time expert the track has been riding fast, dont doubt for
a second that person is wrong.
By:
thegiggilo
When: 11 Jan 14 02:18
Tracks getting quicker by the meeting at swell,so I'd only use times from the last two meetings and keep track of coming meetings,i don't know what sort of weather the tracks been getting but presume its been taking a lot of rain.What you will probably see now is the better class races horses rated 80+ going under 1m40.0 in the mile races and maybe even the far rail not as much as a disadvantage as it usually looks.
By:
roadrunner46
When: 11 Jan 14 02:35
peters friend wins where both faster than tattings wins at southwell, ran 1/2 second faster than his last win and probably needed
that first run after a break. cant rely on the times, not that knowledgeable in that area of expertise, trying to learn and understand
course standard times bit more. hillybilly boy had beaten maputo OR 113 in the past. gl
By:
thegiggilo
When: 11 Jan 14 02:43
You can't compare times of the last meeting to previous runs as the track is so much quicker,look at maakirs win there and look at iots previous 2 runs over 6fs that'll show you how much quicvker the surface is plus it was carrying welterweight 9-8 winning in that time.When it clocked 1m16.01 that was a real good time if you look at the times of the handicaps around the last 2 months,it showed he had improved for drop to 6fs and was a sprinter..
By:
richters
When: 11 Jan 14 04:06
GOOD GRIEF.....ALL IM SAYIN IS ITS A GOOD JOB THAT THEIR IS A ceasefire,,,,,,,,There really should be a cull on here,,,,,,
By:
CheltenhamRoar
When: 11 Jan 14 22:02
Classic roadrunner Laugh
Page 3 of 4  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com