Forums

Irish Sports

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 58 comments are related to the topic:
Sizing robbed ?

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 2 of 2  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 58
By:
Kelly
When: 15 Mar 12 18:13
2 Irish lads in the mix , Silver , so no green glasses issue .  Money glasses maybe .

The relative merits of the current crop of 2 mile chasers is irrelevant , debate was whether the shenanigans MIGHT have affected the ultimate result . The shenanigans probably affected Sizing more given he is a free travelling sort of horse who runs his best when there are no problems in the race .  He is also a very good jumper , and would probably have gained something over the last , possibly more than the distance by which he was beaten .  Plus there is always the "daylight factor" when it occurs .

As Barry Geraghty said in interview this morning , the whole shambles could have been even worse if both he and Andrew Lynch had  jumped the last  , incurring disqualification on basis of a flag waver , and automatic 14 day suspension . In the fraught circumstances which occurred , concentration having been disturbed by flag waving etc  , plus an erratic course revision , whip ban enforced by the body responsible for the shambles does not sit well with me . Crowd of numpties the Aussie has joined . Maybe in time he will sort them out .
By:
silvergreaser
When: 15 Mar 12 21:39
Nobody is debating they're numpties Kelly and the dolling off of the fence should have been much clearer, but its all just surmising as to whether the result was effected.

For all Sizing Europes good jumping he did make a couple of fiddly errors during the race, he could have fiddled the last and Finians Rainbow ping it, or both could have pinged it or maybe even one of them fall, so many permutations, that he came out of the barging match still about a half length up and was beaten a length and a quarter at the finish by a horse winning going away, it can only be pockets talking that would suggest anything other than Finians Rainbow was the better horse on the day.

One things for certain once they jumped the 2nd last the Sizing backers were sweating buckets as Finians Rainbow was looming large and those of us who know SE to be a weak finisher you could say the writing was already on the wall.
By:
wildmanfromborneo
When: 15 Mar 12 21:49
Sizing Europe wasn`t robbed but he was unlucky as i have no doubt if he had to jump the last he would have won.
Andrew Lynch deserved credit for doing the right thing and going round the fence and forcing a reluctant Barry Geraghty to do the same and for the stewards to give him a ban was pernicious.
By:
Rocketfingers
When: 15 Mar 12 22:03
Ah well you quit with the rubbish of speaking thru your pocket please Mr Fav backer from Borneo. Analyise the race fully man and you will clearly see the result would not change, FR moved into 6th gear as Sizing was stuck in 5th. Great race but don't take away from a well deserved winner.
By:
wildmanfromborneo
When: 15 Mar 12 22:17
We know your writing skills are abysmal and whilst pathetically lieing about a double you showed your maths skills are abysmal,you now are showing that your reading skills are also limited.
By:
Allduckornodinner
When: 15 Mar 12 22:43
There's two ways of looking at the QM yesterday.

The first is that in an ideal world Wishful Thinking wouldn't have fallen and the last would have been jumped. Sizing was in front an awful long way out and it's a hard task for any horse to lead off the bend and stay in front with nothing to aim at. In addition jumping another fence would have also been a big help as a sprint doesn't suit him and you can be almost guaranteed that he'd come up well for Andrew if given the opportunity (despite flicking through a few of the previous fences). However if FR was within a length of SE away from the last then he would have quite probably have nutted him near the line.

As it happened having to snatch up inconvenienced SE more than the winner because a big horse like him is always at there best when rolling along and having to check up like that  easily cost him a length for me. If proper procedures were in place and some sort of plastic railing or tape had been put up guiding them around the dolled off fence and no interference had taken place then it would have been much closer but i'd still have FR as the winner by a head.

It was a highly unsatisfactory situation and as Ted said you wouldn't see it at a p2p. Them ****s in the BHA spoiled a great race and robbed the spectators, punters and connections of a fair contest. De Bromhead deserves great credit for being so stoic when interviewed after the race though I suppose it didn't require much debate as it's plain as day that what occurred was terribly amateur.

Also whether you agree with the whip rules or not they could not waive a ban just because of what happened.
By:
wildmanfromborneo
When: 15 Mar 12 22:50
They could have used their discretion with regards the whip.
What was unsatisfactory about the race,they applied the rules correctly.It may have appeared unfair to those unaware of the rules but the fact is the ground staff and Richard Linley did everything right.
By:
Rocketfingers
When: 15 Mar 12 23:02
Not true at all, what rules are you looking at? When a fence is dolled like the one y'day it means that part of it is avilable to jump. This is fact mate, race should have been void mate.
By:
Allduckornodinner
When: 15 Mar 12 23:08
They would have considered whether they chose to use discretion and they decided not to and it was worth a ban. That's pretty straightforward.

Of course it was unsatisfactory. How is a flag man standing near the inside rail against the background of the glaring sun good enough? They should have left the signs the whole way across the fence at a minimum like they intimated at doing before the fence steward decided for whatever reason to move them all to the inside. It wouldn't have taken a whole lot of gumption to have left them the whole way across the fence and made sure it was as visible as possible. Even the commentator who had an eye on the situation for most of the race wasn't sure whether they were going to jump half the fence or not. The excuse they put out about having a fella there blowing a whistle is a pure cop out too. Given it's the sharpest section of the course and the gallop they would be going they need visual aids not relying on a fooking whistle. Three pikes in the ground and some white tape guiding them from a 100 yards before the last around the fence and there would have been no problems.
By:
wildmanfromborneo
When: 15 Mar 12 23:17
The reason they moved the signs together was for the protection of the people on the other side.Your point about discretion contradicts your earlier post,my point was given the extenuating circumstances they should never have imposed a ban,should have given him a medal.
One day by accident Rocketfingers will get something right but i will surely be gone to God when it happens.
By:
Allduckornodinner
When: 15 Mar 12 23:40
There was no fear of the people on the inside of the track. The jockeys can see the big green screens that were up a lot quicker than they are going to hear a whistle. As soon as they wheeled off the bend the two horses had moved to the outside to avoid them but Andrew Lynch and possibly Geraghty weren't sure for a second whether to jump the outer section of the fence or go around it.

How does my earlier point contradict what I said? They looked at the number of times he used his whip and found no good reason to disallow any of them to bring him under the threshold and therefore he was banned. May have been harsh and the rules take the good out of race riding to my mind but thats what they decided.

What are you trying to say exactly? What it sounds to me like anyway is that the correct procedures were followed in your view and yet if that is true then why would Andrew Lynch deserves a medal for nearly taking the wrong course through no fault of anyone else?
By:
Rocketfingers
When: 15 Mar 12 23:46
The guy is a clueless moron, i would not even enter into a convo with him. What is his point "Sizing Europe wasn`t robbed but he was unlucky as i have no doubt if he had to jump the last he would have won."

This is a man who said the Charity race was the best race before to bet on. Laugh Don't make me shame you by asking me to bring it up Wildman
By:
wildmanfromborneo
When: 15 Mar 12 23:54
You glibly say there was no danger but that wasn`t the opinion of the people there,imagine if someone was hurt if a loose horse jumped between the arrows and injured somebody,million pound claims would follow.
The rules were applied correctly as they stand but i feel the rules place too much responsibility on the jockeys and if you review the race you will almost see Andrew Lynch thought process as he first goes to avoid the fence then thinks about jumping it and then correctly goed round it.
Sizing Europe wasn`t robbed in that nothing was done against him he was however unlucky in that he is a super jumper and therefore would have preferred for the last fence not to be omitted.
Bring it up and shame me.
By:
Allduckornodinner
When: 16 Mar 12 00:21
If a loose had come round the bend then he would be less likely to run in the direction of the flag man and the green screens than he would be to run to the outside of the track. You can be as arbitrary as you like and of course safety has to be the primary concern but there should have been much more done to notify the jockeys that the fence was being dolled off.

So one set of procedures were applied stringently and correctly in your view and you see no problem yet another set of rules were applied in a similarly exact manner and you expect discretion to be shown. To most minds there should have been a bit of nous used in both cases but if you've no problem in people hiding behind the rulebook then your standards should apply across the board.

Also you say that the thought process of Andrew Lynch was compromised approaching the fence. This was obviously due to the actions taken by the fence stewards, actions perceived by most to have been lacking in decisiveness and effectiveness. All the while you still state that it wasn't an unsatisfactory conclusion to one of the great races in the calender and that i'm the one contradicting myself. Sure.
By:
Mordin.
When: 16 Mar 12 00:41
Race was a farce two strides after the last fence Sizing Europe was asked not to race but steer away from the fence, he lost a lot of momentum. A stewards decision of a dead heat would have been fair.
By:
Kingchip
When: 16 Mar 12 07:34
Public school boys who are not fit to run a bottle stall at their old boys fete - making excuses for a total disaster. They are making it up as they go along, and closing shop as they go along in addition. How can you manage what is a championship race in the equine olympics in that manner is just unbelievable!

Sizing was robbed, the race should have been voided and I agree that the last two should have been dolled off if any were to be.
Henry must be fuming and I hope he gets his revenge.

Also, surely Lynch is due compensation after that and the Voler ride yesterday?
By:
grade 1
When: 16 Mar 12 11:34
Pocket talking thread.
By:
Kelly
When: 19 Mar 12 14:18
Nothing wrong with a pocket talking thread , grade 1 , as long as the subject needs debated .  The authorities tried to brush this one under the carpet , but thankfully forums like this allow the ordinary joes to express dissatisfaction where it is warranted .

And when someones living is adversely affected by the same authorities who make the rules it is a worry .  To allow people to be judge and jury goes against my principles , independence is always needed to stop under the carpet behaviour . If you sin you take the consequences , OK with that , but to punish one guy and ignore a bigger culpability is basically wrong . Acknowledgement needed , but guess we may have to wait until the Aussie sorts them out ( hopefully , but dont hold your breath ) .
By:
grade 1
When: 21 Mar 12 22:44
I am not saying that the dolling off situation wasn't poorly managed but anyone who thinks that sizing was robbed needs to look at the jumping of both horses at the third last. Geraghty was always going to play Finians late after getting mugged by Somersby at Ascot.
Page 2 of 2  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com