good thinking that, im a million to get paid though. some bet he had there 200 at 10/3 lose no bet!!! Id have paid up the 666 with a smile (gritted teeth type)
good thinking that, im a million to get paid though. some bet he had there 200 at 10/3 lose no bet!!! Id have paid up the 666 with a smile (gritted teeth type)
insideinfo, yeah the man owes me 200. and has knocked. its not the money, its the principle- id have paid him. Are you a mate of his, or just a mouthpiece for non payers?
insideinfo, yeah the man owes me 200. and has knocked. its not the money, its the principle- id have paid him. Are you a mate of his, or just a mouthpiece for non payers?
no, he asked for the bet on this forum, i offered him the bet, and emails confirmed the bet.
after it lost, he gave me some flannel about a lack of chqs, but a month later has still failed to "weigh in"
the main point was that he asked for the bet. though for a mere 200 he would pay, but must be a knacker.
no, he asked for the bet on this forum, i offered him the bet, and emails confirmed the bet.after it lost, he gave me some flannel about a lack of chqs, but a month later has still failed to "weigh in"the main point was that he asked for the bet. tho
I remember the thread and remember him asking for the bet because I backed the horse that day too.
I presume youre all trying to wind Win Only up, we all know a bets a bet FFS and you pay up.
I remember the thread and remember him asking for the bet because I backed the horse that day too.I presume youre all trying to wind Win Only up, we all know a bets a bet FFS and you pay up.
Just flagging him up as a knocker, incase anyone else gets caught. You would obviously be only too please to knock someone yourself, seeing as you are defending this man.
Just flagging him up as a knocker, incase anyone else gets caught. You would obviously be only too please to knock someone yourself, seeing as you are defending this man.
Doyler1987 03 Apr 10 22:51 norekk I love the horse as much as the next man but he wont be 10/1 for a Gold Cup tomorrow!
Wonder what price he'll be fallers insurance.. Most of his falls have come on testing ground :| Win only - Sp only 03 Apr 10 23:02 norekk, if you really think zarito is only 50% to get around and consider 10/3 a bet, can I lay you private please? rooste 03 Apr 10 23:19 You can lay me 100/30 private if you like Win only - Sp only 03 Apr 10 23:43 how much would you like? rooste 03 Apr 10 23:48 300 Win only - Sp only 03 Apr 10 23:50 i would love to say yes, but having been knocked by someone recently on ante post forum- i feel folly to offer this to a sttanger, you have 333/100 for sport... as the (potential) non payment would be easier to bear!
Doyler1987 03 Apr 10 22:51 norekk I love the horse as much as the next man but he wont be 10/1 for a Gold Cup tomorrow!Wonder what price he'll be fallers insurance..Most of his falls have come on testing ground :|Win only - Sp only 03 A
Keep posting and we'll have a whip round for you wospo, hate the thought of someone like you being down a WHOLE 100. It's lucky he doesn't owe you thousands or we'd be really stuck with the whip round tbh
Keep posting and we'll have a whip round for you wospo, hate the thought of someone like you being down a WHOLE 100. It's lucky he doesn't owe you thousands or we'd be really stuck with the whip round tbh
I doubt Betfair will be too impressed at you using the forum to tout for your own private business.I presume you do have your own licence win only? Otherwise you would be acting illegally would you not?
I doubt Betfair will be too impressed at you using the forum to tout for your own private business.I presume you do have your own licence win only? Otherwise you would be acting illegally would you not?
PS. Will anywon hear lay me €500 at 4/1 St Nicholas Abbey for ze Derby and if he loosses I dont have to give yew ze munnie, If he wins though I expect to be paid.
PS. Will anywon hear lay me €500 at 4/1 St Nicholas Abbey for ze Derby and if he loosses I dont have to give yew ze munnie, If he wins though I expect to be paid.
It just goes to show the sort of fellas you get on here, shouting their mouths off etc.
I remember that thread and bet very well, just a pity the bloke turned out to be a degenerate.
It just goes to show the sort of fellas you get on here, shouting their mouths off etc. I remember that thread and bet very well, just a pity the bloke turned out to be a degenerate.
I think its fair to say Win Only would have paid up IMO, been around a while, a regular contributor and has an opinion.
It does indeed go to show the forum for what it is though, a load of hot air.
I think its fair to say Win Only would have paid up IMO, been around a while, a regular contributor and has an opinion.It does indeed go to show the forum for what it is though, a load of hot air.
Wospo had a similar bet on the AP forum regarding St Nicholas Abbey i think it was- he lost and paid up straight away iirc
So yes he would have paid up imvho
Wospo had a similar bet on the AP forum regarding St Nicholas Abbey i think it was- he lost and paid up straight away iircSo yes he would have paid up imvho
paid every bet i have ever had, thought thats what gentlemen did.
In fairness to Paul he had a great no lose bet there, hopefully at least some of his friends (if he has any) have seen this, and can at least see him for the person he is.
paid every bet i have ever had, thought thats what gentlemen did.In fairness to Paul he had a great no lose bet there, hopefully at least some of his friends (if he has any) have seen this, and can at least see him for the person he is.
All the idiots saying it's only a ton, are symptomatic of why the country is in the state it it. Everyone wants something for nothing.
Not paying up on a bet is the lowest of the low.
Unlucky Win, you're going to have to start demanding an escrow on all future bets.
All the idiots saying it's only a ton, are symptomatic of why the country is in the state it it. Everyone wants something for nothing. Not paying up on a bet is the lowest of the low.Unlucky Win, you're going to have to start demanding an e
allez ..it's 2010 we now live in, and you are the idiot if you are among a group of people who thinks it's ok to take a bet online without money from somebody you dont know. If your teen child did something similar in a chatroom you'd be both disappointed and angry at their stupidity. Imo this is an issue of stupidity over honour.
allez ..it's 2010 we now live in, and you are the idiot if you are among a group of people who thinks it's ok to take a bet online without money from somebody you dont know. If your teen child did something similar in a chatroom you'd