There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
11 Sep 26
08:49
Joined:
Date Joined:
05 Oct 11
This looks another shocking renewal, and bookmakers have already had a result with the 8 reduced to 7.
Caballo De Mar should be a class above, but do you really want to take 11/8 about a horse who has appeared to be going backwards. At his best he should be odds on against a bunch of handicappers. I took a risk on Ascending, but that was at 20/1 with three places. I wouldn't be at all interested at the revised terms. He has several questions to answer himself - ground, distance, and step up in class.
Caballo De Mar should be a class above, but do you really want to take 11/8 about a horse who has appeared to be going backwards. At his best he should be odds on against a bunch of handicappers. I took a risk on Ascending, but that was at 20/1 with three places. I wouldn't be at all interested at the revised terms. He has several questions to answer himself - ground, distance, and step up in class.
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 6
|
By:
Now another chunky Rule 4 in the Flying Childers as well.
|
|
By:
Horrible race tbh.
|
|
By:
Winday rated 97 has not taken advantage of a good handicap mark before this. 4/1 so not a major punt.
|
|
By:
Worst ever field I can remember for this race..it was bad enough before O'Brien pulled his out..I wouldn't say the St Leger is that great either..
|
|
By:
Caballo De Mar runs his race, goes off odds on, and wins easily. Ascending doesn't look to stay, and weakens into third. Lovely.
|
|
By:
Pretty uneventful race, going to form/expectation. The third fav should have been hooked, that will have saved a RF for a few.
|