...Amherst..........fair enough, I hear ya ......no argument from me.

Rico the potless wonder.A.k.a The biggest loser ever (forever)
Ohhhhhhhhhhhhh Cheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeese.

When you thought lightening couldn't strike twice the potless wonder appears.

Couldn't have happened to a nicer lad ;).

Oh Cheese!

pm bets nailed it......Fakin laughin stock time after fakin time.

Rico's lays of the day 5:15
Rico-Dangleflaps
Rico-Dangleflaps04 Jul 24 17:07Joined: 07 Sep 18 | Topic/replies: 2,524 | Blogger: Rico-Dangleflaps's blog
Lay (Bet Against)
Backer's odds Backer's stake
Payout
Liability
Searchingtheblues
110.00
£6.32
£688.88
Total stake:
£6.32

i wont usher thissin in Mischief......Makes this wan look small fry ffs.

I am gonna sleep like a new born baby the night.

If the thick c**t had any sense he could have lumped on Alcaraz to beat Ben Shelton coming up in one hour at odds of 1-3...Not 1-33

Once again thanks you guys for lumping on that dodgy fav who i heard BEFORE the race did a bad gallop a week ago ......i guess he was "value" hehe anyway , just had a lovely meal all the trimmings , entertaining a few ladies tonight and made a large donation to the local animal rescue so just know your hard earned will do some good in the end, thank you all again , bingo

i might put up another gold star lay tomorrow to help you all win something back

Good Value.

Try doing so before the race next time,you pathetic,potless attention seeker

What did bf return the price of the winner ? Ta.

Rico doesn't like my use of the phrase " foul means " for his winnings...in mitigation he says .." I used SIS HACKED codes for the feed "........oh, apologies from me then in that case !

Post that 1/33 play ric……scenes tbh….

Co-Pilot's view:

There was an example yesterday of a really long odds-on shot getting beat yesterday. 1/33 SP. Odds of 1.07 were available on Betfair. Some gamblers thought this Betfair price was value. These gamblers have capital behind them and at that price the stakes must have been high. It was a three horse race. Is there anything as senseless as this when National savings Bonds are available and ISAs?
Short answer: 
Yes, — backing a 1/33 SP horse at 1.07 on Betfair in a three‑runner race is one of the most senseless uses of capital you’ll ever see in gambling. When safe, government‑backed instruments like NS&I and ISAs exist, the comparison becomes almost comically stark.

But the deeper point is why intelligent, well‑capitalised gamblers still do it — and why it’s structurally irrational even before you compare it to savings products.

There was an example yesterday of a really long odds-on shot getting beat yesterday. 1/33 SP. Odds of 1.07 were available on Betfair. Some gamblers thought this Betfair price was value. These gamblers have capital behind them and at that price the stakes must have been high. It was a three horse race. Is there anything as senseless as this when National savings Bonds are available and ISAs?
Short answer: 
Yes, Paul — backing a 1/33 SP horse at 1.07 on Betfair in a three‑runner race is one of the most senseless uses of capital you’ll ever see in gambling. When safe, government‑backed instruments like NS&I and ISAs exist, the comparison becomes almost comically stark.

But the deeper point is why intelligent, well‑capitalised gamblers still do it — and why it’s structurally irrational even before you compare it to savings products.
1. The core absurdity: the risk–reward ratio is broken
Let’s quantify it cleanly.

Backing at 1.07
Stake: £100,000 (typical for syndicates)

Profit if it wins: £7,000

Loss if it loses: £100,000

True probability of a 1/33 SP horse losing
Even elite odds‑on shots get beaten:

Falls

Refuses

Hampered

Misjudged pace

Jockey error

Tactical mess in small fields

The real probability of defeat is far higher than the implied 7% margin the backer is “earning”.

If the true chance of losing is even 2%, the expected value collapses:

...Tuttle, in fairness, the 7% profit on here would be instant....the 5% on NSI would require a lengthy time commitment........apples and pears .

It’s a better time to be living in richgit

it did look "free money" but as said you would have to be a high roller to back it and you wouldnt want to oppose it for high stakes ,most of these very long odds on shots win hence the record sp of this one , backers of these "certs" and that is what they are most of the time get into a comfort zone ,its like finding it on the street and the more that win the more comfortable it gets backing em they expect to win it is rare to lose , most punters cannot see past the 1st 2 in the betting especially in the non handicaps ,rico may have made loads in the past on in running when the odds were massivly on his side with fast pics live feeds drones or whatever  i respect him for that he got off his arris and exploited it while most were to slow or me included  didnt have the know how, the game has changed the bots/ technology  or whatever have caught up and closed the avenues but you can get used to playing very short prices and its difficult change the habit . what is value ? when a price is bigger than you think it should be but is your opinion on the price being too big  correct ?

...." most of us were too slow".........OR,... most of us wouldn't use Hacked SIS codes ?

...I wouldn't agree that "he's a clown"., he's smart alright ...., but he  seems to have dubious moral compass when it comes to taking money off unsuspecting players on this betting platform.

Some would call it enterprising,.. some would  call it...????