Same nonsense in the 5th race, down to World Pool rubbish The fav, Primo lara finishes 4th of 16 in a handicap Counts as going through in the placepot, but not in the actual race place dividends... Only paying 3 places there
Sort this out ,T0te
Same nonsense in the 5th race, down to World Pool rubbish The fav, Primo lara finishes 4th of 16 in a handicap Counts as going through in the placepot, but not in the actual race place dividends...Only paying 3 places thereSort this out ,T0te
So, let me get this right. 16+ runners in a handicap and obviously the first four home are ‘placed’. Yet if you backed a horse to place on the Tote, you’d only get paid out on the first three?
So, let me get this right. 16+ runners in a handicap and obviously the first four home are ‘placed’. Yet if you backed a horse to place on the Tote, you’d only get paid out on the first three?
Exactly, Kenbo, presumably because of World Tote rules But to complicate it further, the first 4 went through on the placepot
That's why we're saying it's a ridiculous situation
Exactly, Kenbo, presumably because of World Tote rulesBut to complicate it further, the first 4 went through on the placepotThat's why we're saying it's a ridiculous situation
Its pretty straight forward, placepot rules never change, only the Tote places causing confusion on "World pool " meetings.
On World Pool days, the Tote Placepot operates as normal across the first six races of the designated meeting, but benefits from massive global liquidity commingled by the Hong Kong Jockey Club. Place terms strictly follow international rules (e.g., 3 places for 7–20 runners, 4 places for 21+ runners).
Its pretty straight forward, placepot rules never change, only the Tote places causing confusion on "World pool " meetings. On World Pool days, the Tote Placepot operates as normal across the first six races of the designated meeting, but benefits fr
I’d guess most punters betting a place on the Tote would expect to be paid out on fourth place on those two races. Changing our standard place terms because it’s a world pool is ridiculous.
I’d guess most punters betting a place on the Tote would expect to be paid out on fourth place on those two races. Changing our standard place terms because it’s a world pool is ridiculous.
... Thats right, the 1-50 race was a handicap with 19 runners, therefore the first 4 go through on placepots.
The confusion sets in as only 3 Tote places were declared as per World Pool rules.
Longbridge, I Totally agree that not enough is done to make the punter aware of these World Pool meetings.
... Thats right, the 1-50 race was a handicap with 19 runners, therefore the first 4 go through on placepots. The confusion sets in as only 3 Tote places were declared as per World Pool rules. Longbridge, I Totally agree that not enough is done to