|
By:
After Oisin's testimony, I thought it could only go one way but then again it is stewards ...
|
|
By:
Lot of cheating/hoovering on the announcement
1.01/90s last matched Wonder if Betfair will do anything? |
|
By:
Perhaps it might have been the people who saw the fat lump of lard ignore both Davy Russell and Paddy Brenan at Aintree
|
|
By:
Bet the winner then layed my stake, can anyone tell me what’s the difference between that and ripon the other night, are the stewards scared of certain trainers or owners, should have been changed imo
|
|
By:
No, they were obviously quite minded to change it.
|
|
By:
Perversely, OM probably prevented the switch
|
|
By:
Worse intimidation than at Ripon. Absolute crap shoot these Stewards enquiries are now.
|
|
By:
I didn't play but there was enough to switch it. A SH or nse and they would have I suspect.
|
|
By:
the jockey on the 2nd past the post at ripon maybe didn't go into the stewards room and basically tell them whatever happened during the race had absolutely no impact on the result and the winner is completely entitled to keep the race.
|
|
By:
Good old Murphy
![]() |
|
By:
when they asked marquand for his take all he needed to say was i agree with what Mr Murphy just said.
|
|
By:
is that no winners for OM now at r ascot and goodwood so far this year, proves it horses that win races not jockeys unless youre lester
|
|
By:
last 50 stewards trident been correct 7 times.
![]() |
|
By:
Warrac****
@Warrac**** · 6s @BHAHorseracing so today at Goodwood theres a stewards inquiry 1:50..it was practically identical to what happened at Ripon monday night...at ripon the winner was placed 3rd today result stands..The Ripon decision was absolutely embarrassing, the BHA are totally incompetant. |
|
By:
|
|
By:
Definitely more likely to have been overturned had Oisin not gone into the Stewards.
|
|
By:
Must admit I didn’t hear Murphy interview
|
|
By:
No real fancy in the next, going to put a few pounds for fun on Oisin. Funny how things often change the next week.
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
that stewards summed the current murphy up
no good group 1 rides,100,s shot in sussex balding having great season but murphy not on the good ones championship challenge means spending to much time on the wagon doesnt see interested anymore,if their good enough he,ll win on vast maj of them,but thats about it,ait going to be breaking sweat to get one up |
|
By:
Oisin was just being honest..
|
|
By:
The second could have won twice - I don't think Murphy covered himself with glory in the finish, and seemed to be not 'all out' - almost coasting when he drew level
Then if he kept his gob shut in the SI, there was good chance it would have been reversed, especially as the 2nds owners sponsor the meeting Very weak on both counts |
|
By:
Honest racing connections, now that's a first! He could have remained honest and been more enthusiastic about pursuing a reversal. For whatever reason, he didn't want to be there. Maybe he thought he should have won the race on the track.
|
|
By:
agree , jack , he thought he had it in the bag
|