called wrong result perth

An act of good faith

RTV back on this now.

Weighed in was announced according to the RTV guy on track.

Result was reversed but still unclear whether the result was changed before or after weigh in was announced.

Apparently a Racetech technician alerted the judges to the error.

broont saying weigh in was called and wont changed for betting purposes...so how can they change the result after 'weigh in'  farcical.

A mess up all round then. Gordon Brown is clear the weighed in was announced.....and for betting purposes that is the result.

What a shambles.

It certainly is

Fiar play to Gordon Brown for phoning in, he's probably 3 pints down in Brown and Blacks.

https://www.racingpost.com/news/britain/perth-festival-finishes-in-farce-aft...

if the weighed in was called the result then cannot be changed for betting purposes.

simple.

Try again https://www.racingpost.com/news/britain/perth-festival-finishes-in-farce-aft...

Give in "

The BHA stewards' report said: "An enquiry was held to establish the circumstances surrounding why the judge incorrectly announced Ksar D'Oudairies as the winner and Fiskardo as the second-placed horse, before subsequently re-announcing the correct result after the weighed-in signal was given.

"The judge, photo-finish operator, and the chief steward were interviewed. Having heard their evidence, a report was forwarded to the head office of the British Horseracing Authority for further consideration."

Betfair need to reverse this back to the original - a fooking farce from Betfair -

How and why should BF do this,Kriskin?

However we will re-settle all bets should the official result at the time of the "weigh-in" announcement differ from any initial settlement - these are your rules u klowns - pay me back my money you took off me

Apr 24, 2026 -- 7:31PM, uptheirons wrote:

How and why should BF do this,Kriskin?

If the weigh in was called before the result corrected then bookmakers should be paying out on FPTP.

if anyone can tell me a result thats been reversed by the stewards after the weigh in i'm all ears. I cant ever think of one

Grow up,Kriskin.
The Rules are clear and you lost

weighed in was called at track long before result was corrected

The Weighed In result stands,as always

The BHA stewards' report said: "An enquiry was held to establish the circumstances surrounding why the judge incorrectly announced Ksar D'Oudairies as the winner and Fiskardo as the second-placed horse, before subsequently re-announcing the correct result after the weighed-in signal was given.

uptheirons 24 Apr 26 19:33 
Grow up,Kriskin.
The Rules are clear and you lost

you are wrong..if the 'weighed in' was annonced for betting purposes they cannot reverse this.

Was that not what I said?

irons - u owe me an apology -

Race 8 - 5:35pm
THE EVERY RACE LIVE ON RACING TV OPEN NATIONAL HUNT FLAT RACE (CLASS 4) (Category 1 Elimination) (GBB RACE)

Permission was given for ROCK ON RONNIE (IRE) to wear a red hood to the start.

An enquiry was held to establish the circumstances surrounding why the Judge incorrectly announced KSAR D’DOUDAIRIES (FR) as the winner and FISKARDO (IRE) as the second placed horse before subsequently re-announcing the correct result after the weighed in signal was given. The Judge, the Photo-Finish Operator, and the Chief Steward were interviewed. Having heard their evidence, a report was forwarded to the Head Office of the British Horseracing Authority for further consideration and the amended result was as follows: First – FISKARDO (IRE), Second – KSAR D’OUDAIRIES (FR), Third – ROCK ON RONNIE (IRE), Fourth – AR AIS ARIS (IRE) after the weighed in signal had been given.

clear as day..they cannot change the result for betting purposes.

uptheirons 24 Apr 26 19:36 
The Weighed In result stands,as always


it hasnt tho..betfair have reversed it.

That would be a first then,Rico.

which is why betfair should do the right thing and compensate folk.

68.4 After the announcement of Weighed In, no alteration may be made on the board or screen in respect of the
numbers of the winner or placed horses.

They have never done so before,aberdonia,as far as I can recall

BTW.I had no involvement on the race

reversing the bets is wrong.

Apr 24, 2026 -- 7:43PM, Rico-Dangleflaps wrote:

Race 8 - 5:35pmTHE EVERY RACE LIVE ON RACING TV OPEN NATIONAL HUNT FLAT RACE (CLASS 4) (Category 1 Elimination) (GBB RACE)Permission was given for ROCK ON RONNIE (IRE) to wear a red hood to the start.An enquiry was held to establish the circumstances surrounding why the Judge incorrectly announced KSAR D’DOUDAIRIES (FR) as the winner and FISKARDO (IRE) as the second placed horse before subsequently re-announcing the correct result after the weighed in signal was given. The Judge, the Photo-Finish Operator, and the Chief Steward were interviewed. Having heard their evidence, a report was forwarded to the Head Office of the British Horseracing Authority for further consideration and the amended result was as follows: First – FISKARDO (IRE), Second – KSAR D’OUDAIRIES (FR), Third – ROCK ON RONNIE (IRE), Fourth – AR AIS ARIS (IRE) after the weighed in signal had been given.clear as day..they cannot change the result for betting purposes.

The BHA statement is misleading. Yes they've amended the result, which I guess they can do that for prize money purposes. But the amendment is immaterial for betting purposes

Apr 24, 2026 -- 7:31PM, uptheirons wrote:

How and why should BF do this,Kriskin?

to settle in accordance with their own rules uti

Apr 24, 2026 -- 7:33PM, scoobytoo wrote:

if anyone can tell me a result thats been reversed by the stewards after the weigh in i'm all ears. I cant ever think of one

been numerous over the years

sandown sprint race
kempton a/w race smudger smith

Apr 24, 2026 -- 8:02PM, Big Cat wrote:

Apr 24, 2026 --  7:43PM, Rico-Dangleflaps wrote:Race 8 - 5:35pmTHE EVERY RACE LIVE ON RACING TV OPEN NATIONAL HUNT FLAT RACE (CLASS 4) (Category 1 Elimination) (GBB RACE)Permission was given for ROCK ON RONNIE (IRE) to wear a red hood to the start.An enquiry was held to establish the circumstances surrounding why the Judge incorrectly announced KSAR D’DOUDAIRIES (FR) as the winner and FISKARDO (IRE) as the second placed horse before subsequently re-announcing the correct result after the weighed in signal was given. The Judge, the Photo-Finish Operator, and the Chief Steward were interviewed. Having heard their evidence, a report was forwarded to the Head Office of the British Horseracing Authority for further consideration and the amended result was as follows: First – FISKARDO (IRE), Second – KSAR D’OUDAIRIES (FR), Third – ROCK ON RONNIE (IRE), Fourth – AR AIS ARIS (IRE) after the weighed in signal had been given.clear as day..they cannot change the result for betting purposes.The BHA statement is misleading. Yes they've amended the result, which I guess they can do that for prize money purposes. But the amendment is immaterial for betting purposes

yes...similar to the whip DQs

does not matter after weighed in announcement

You at 19:55, Apr 24:
but its known in racing that once the 'weighed signal' is given the result cannot be changed for betting purposes
Read
You at 19:55, Apr 24:
betfaie are wrong to reverse to payout payments
Read
Andrea at 19:58, Apr 24:

I have raised this over to our traders stephen
You at 20:00, Apr 24:
i would like someone senior to look at this please...the payments cannot be changed once weighed in is announced
Read
You at 20:00, Apr 24:
the stewards report is above..the weigh in had already been called
Read
Andrea at 20:04, Apr 24:

The traders have advised me that this is being discussed and that at the moment they will not be making any amendment until they reach a decision
You at 20:05, Apr 24:
ok..thanks but as ive said the result for betting purposes cannot be changed once the officail weigh in is announced..the rules are clear as day

Obviously, the morally correct thing to do is revise the result. But there's no room for common sense when the rules are very clear and the facts have only now been released

Has your loss been reversed,Jamee?

ok..thanks but as ive said the result for betting purposes cannot be changed once the officail weigh in is announced..the rules are clear as day
Read
Andrea at 20:06, Apr 24:

Yes Stephen I totally understand were you are coming from , which is why i am pushing the traders to review this and reach a decision as soon as possible

Race 8 - 5:35pm
THE EVERY RACE LIVE ON RACING TV OPEN NATIONAL HUNT FLAT RACE (CLASS 4) (Category 1 Elimination) (GBB RACE)
An enquiry was held to establish the circumstances surrounding why the Judge incorrectly announced KSAR D’DOUDAIRIES (FR) as the winner and FISKARDO (IRE) as the second placed horse before subsequently re-announcing the correct result after the weighed in signal was given. The Judge, the Photo-Finish Operator, and the Chief Steward were interviewed. Having heard their evidence, a report was forwarded to the Head Office of the British Horseracing Authority for further consideration and the amended result was as follows: First – FISKARDO (IRE), Second – KSAR D’OUDAIRIES (FR), Third – ROCK ON RONNIE (IRE), Fourth – AR AIS ARIS (IRE) after the weighed in signal had been given.

this will be reversed back on BF

Apr 24, 2026 -- 8:06PM, Rico-Dangleflaps wrote:

You at 19:55, Apr 24:but its known in racing that once the 'weighed signal' is given the result cannot be changed for betting purposesReadYou at 19:55, Apr 24:betfaie are wrong to reverse to payout paymentsReadAndrea at 19:58, Apr 24:I have raised this over to our traders stephenYou at 20:00, Apr 24:i would like someone senior to look at this please...the payments cannot be changed once weighed in is announcedReadYou at 20:00, Apr 24:the stewards report is above..the weigh in had already been calledReadAndrea at 20:04, Apr 24:The traders have advised me that this is being discussed and that at the moment they will not be making any amendment until they reach a decisionYou at 20:05, Apr 24:ok..thanks but as ive said the result for betting purposes cannot be changed once the officail weigh in is announced..the rules are clear as day

I'm onto them as well. Apparently 'Exchange Specialists' are reviewing the circumstances

anybody who can read BF's own rules & the stewards report can work this out
you don't need to be a specialist

the result should not have been amended once the 'weighed in' was announced..simple and clear as day.

correct

It's been discussed on here before, but I thought after previous disasters, the judge's decision was meant to be double checked by another staffer before being announced.

Indeed.
A precedent that will come back to bite BF,wonders

The rules of racing are not relevant to being an “exchange specialist “

The weighed in result should stand with betfair compensating the sufferers who
Are losing money through a palpable error.

It won’t be a lot of money to betfair, but good publicity.

Apr 24, 2026 -- 8:07PM, uptheirons wrote:

Has your loss been reversed,Jamee?

So far it's been settled as the original result, then resettled with the corrected result.

Apr 24, 2026 -- 8:18PM, aberdonia wrote:

The rules of racing are not relevant to being an “exchange specialist “The weighed in result should stand with betfair compensating the sufferers whoAre losing money through a palpable error.It won’t be a lot of money to betfair, but good publicity.

£40k traded in the photo.

Unbelievable,but well done

People who backed the wrong horse in photo betting still want paying out as the judge called the wrong one the winner, and it wasn't noticed before they'd weighed in?

Apr 24, 2026 -- 8:29PM, uptheirons wrote:

Unbelievable,but well done

£40k was the market, not me.

Have a go at the Lottery tomorrow,Jamee

The letter of the rules yes, not something I'd be chasing up, personally. It is lacking competency from bf, or someone took the judgement that it's easier than facing down complaints from those on the corrected winner (something that I know they do, much to my chagrin).

but.why have the BHA changed the officail resulkt 1 hour after the race and after the weighed in was announced? that is a fragrant breach of their own rules.

Race 8 - 5:35pm
THE EVERY RACE LIVE ON RACING TV OPEN NATIONAL HUNT FLAT RACE (CLASS 4) (Category 1 Elimination) (GBB RACE)

Permission was given for ROCK ON RONNIE (IRE) to wear a red hood to the start.

An enquiry was held to establish the circumstances surrounding why the Judge incorrectly announced KSAR D’DOUDAIRIES (FR) as the winner and FISKARDO (IRE) as the second placed horse before subsequently re-announcing the correct result after the weighed in signal was given. The Judge, the Photo-Finish Operator, and the Chief Steward were interviewed. Having heard their evidence, a report was forwarded to the Head Office of the British Horseracing Authority for further consideration and the amended result was as follows: First – FISKARDO (IRE), Second – KSAR D’OUDAIRIES (FR), Third – ROCK ON RONNIE (IRE), Fourth – AR AIS ARIS (IRE) after the weighed in signal had been given.

Rule 68.4 After the announcement of Weighed In, no alteration may be made on the board or screen in respect of the numbers of the winner or placed horses.

Apr 24, 2026 -- 8:31PM, uptheirons wrote:

Have a go at the Lottery tomorrow,Jamee

I don't think it's over yet.

My chatbot is closed now. The market is under review by their 'specialists' and a decision may take some hours to reach. It's clear to me, I know any outcome is unfair, but we're playing a game with clear rules and large sums of dosh here. Decisions can't be based on common sense or morality, it has to be in accordance with rules

BC..the BHA make the rules..

Rule 68.4 After the announcement of Weighed In, no alteration may be made on the board or screen in respect of the numbers of the winner or placed horses.

why did they change the 'official result' ..

Absolutely.Big Cat

Re-resettled!

change incoming......

my exposure is back but not settled

You would hope so, but they have plenty of form for not following their own rules, if that's the path of least resistance. In this case, they may have done the correct thing (eventually)

Apr 24, 2026 -- 8:31PM, uptheirons wrote:

Have a go at the Lottery tomorrow,Jamee

Looks like it's Rico who should be playing the lottery.

Backs the wrong horse in a photo and still gets paid out!

Betfair have a rulebook, they can't make it up on the hoof.

Although I've seen it before with their managing of US racing markets.

Now resettled as the originally declared winner.

yes now re-settled..bad luck jamee but its the right decision..rules are rules..the bha should never have changed it.

absoulte and utter clowns

ksar doudairies now the winner

v unfortunate for those who have lost on this but correct outcome has finally been arrived at

So I backed real winner Fiskardo they resettled as a win after first a loser . But now they’ve taken it back off me , why ? Had the wrong winner already weighed in before it was spotted ?

I wonder what approach other bookies will take. All results now showing the fptp as the winner.

So I’ve won but now lost anyway

Surely you can sue BHA for a situation like this ?! Complete negligence on their part

The Books will spout their usual nonsense and having taken F/A on the race will pay both outcomes,swifty

why the fck was it ever changed? its their own rules.

an absolute and total cringe.

yes you'd imagine 10 out 14 in a bumper stable neglected as well.. won't be many winning dockets fiskardo

This has to be up there with their biggest mess up , unbelievable.
What happened to all these extra checks before weighing in!

uti, I should think so, they have the leeway.

Betfair is a different case, unless they want the publicity, but never seen it before bar a free bet!

i#d like to nah who gave the go ahead for the result to be 'officially' changed..needs sacked.

Wondered why my balence was changed, said error and found out at the racing post betfair  cant change rules of racing, they can lose there licence and a class action

they have abided by the rules ya clown.

Rule 68.4 After the announcement of Weighed In, no alteration may be made on the board or screen in respect of the numbers of the winner or placed horses.

they are now re-settling a race from 2013 when a horse was subsequently DQd for doping!

BHA being re-named Billy Smarts.

......you had one job to do...

Judge Fraser Perratt

Chief Steward Adrian Sharpe

Chief Steward Adrian Sharpe

    .... Made me chuckle.

Theres been another f up

● Ade Edmonson.

Chances of him calling the wrong result are factored into the odds.
No such thing as easy money, unlucky.

Of course it's easy money long term. Good.  Jamee only gets one wrong when the judge messes up.

ewe got hacksess to his acc?

What you'll tend to find with gamblers is if they say they lost 5k, it's probably nearer 20k. But again, unlucky.

eye kon kerr wiv ulk ear.

Cider
You would hope so, but they have plenty of form for not following their own rules, if that's the path of least resistance. In this case, they may have done the correct thing (eventually)

The BHA refused to let a horse run in the English Derby a few years ago even thought it was entitled.
The BHA's explanation was something like "we have a rule that we can ignore our rules".

outlets still showing the revised result...why?

What was the Tote's position?...they must have paid out at the windows fairly quickly after the erroneous result, surely?

The stewards' report on the incident read: “An enquiry was held to establish the circumstances surrounding why the Judge incorrectly announced KSAR D'DOUDAIRIES (FR) as the winner and FISKARDO (IRE) as the second placed horse before subsequently re-announcing the correct result after the weighed in signal was given.1 day ago

Rico-Dangleflaps 24 Apr 26 20:32
but.why have the BHA changed the officail resulkt 1 hour after the race and after the weighed in was announced? that is a fragrant breach of their own rules.

Race 8 - 5:35pm
THE EVERY RACE LIVE ON RACING TV OPEN NATIONAL HUNT FLAT RACE (CLASS 4) (Category 1 Elimination) (GBB RACE)

Permission was given for ROCK ON RONNIE (IRE) to wear a red hood to the start.

An enquiry was held to establish the circumstances surrounding why the Judge incorrectly announced KSAR D’DOUDAIRIES (FR) as the winner and FISKARDO (IRE) as the second placed horse before subsequently re-announcing the correct result after the weighed in signal was given. The Judge, the Photo-Finish Operator, and the Chief Steward were interviewed. Having heard their evidence, a report was forwarded to the Head Office of the British Horseracing Authority for further consideration and the amended result was as follows: First – FISKARDO (IRE), Second – KSAR D’OUDAIRIES (FR), Third – ROCK ON RONNIE (IRE), Fourth – AR AIS ARIS (IRE) after the weighed in signal had been given.

Rule 68.4 After the announcement of Weighed In, no alteration may be made on the board or screen in respect of the numbers of the winner or placed horses.

Rule 68.5
We can make the rules up as we go along cos it ain't policed and nobody gives a flying fk about the rules.


Except Rico.

[b] Walofs [/b

jamee's escalated his complaint to loose women. 

kaye adams and nadia sawalha will be looking into it.

jamees been munching on gemma collins essex triangle.