700 Leafy

drifted back out again, then ....

9.4 to 8.0

7.4 merci paudy.  outed yasel though

bsp 7.0  (from 9.4)

9.4 after 50 yards

last price matched 1000.0

never in the hunt.

let this be a warning to you, that paudy is moving these (9.4 to 7.0) and it's not because they are going to win.  i've shown you one of his amounts above (£108, that is his). 

Bye bye

(Ring price: 7/1 13/2 7/1 13/2 6/1 13/2 6/1 11/2) SP 11/2

and what he's doing does impact the industry SP (see above)

Does he ever shut up


You are as interesting as a flicked wort

*wart

wd hulk..

£1000 on at 9.4 8400

laid £1400 at 7 8400

copped $400.

wd.

yes very well done hulk.

£1 on at 9.4 £8.40

laid £1.02 at 9.2 £8.36

copped 4p

What I don't understand is why Hulk hasn't actually taken one or more of these £108 bets because he would of found out
that in almost all cases it would be a number of different bets adding up to £108 and that would totally f*ck up his theory.


It might cost him a few quid to get out of the bet but if he'd done it years ago he'd possible still have his sanity.

Football / St.Anna v UFC Fehring / Over/Under 5.5 Goals
Over 5.5 Goals    Lay    4180428XXXXX    10-Feb-26         1.41

i'll try to explain JML.  But you need to listen, and you need to recognise that i may just be correct.
This is a Club Friendly game between 2 Austrian teams that you have never heard off, and will most likely never hear off again.  You with me so far ?  Nobody is betting on this, except me.  Nobody is betting on Over 5.5 goals in this match between 2 teams you have never heard off.  Except me.

So when i put a lay in at 1.41, and £108 immediately appears laying 1.42 - according to you that "just happened" to be 'a number of different bets', which "just happened" to total £108, and it "just happened" to be at one tick more than mine.  In a game which "just happened" to be between 2 teams you have never heard off, and "just happened" to be on the extremely obscure Over 5.5 goals market.

if you believe that is coincidence, fair enough.  but we all know it wasn't. somebody placed that bet because i placed mine.  who can do that ?  paudy, nobody else.  you don't know my bets, so you can't stick £108 in front of me.  Nobody does, except Paudy.  He can see every bet. 

can i prove it ?  yes, if i have access to paudys records.  but that's not going to happen so no i can't prove it.  but that doesn't mean it's not happening every day, on every market.

by the way, it lost.  5-1.

it's 423am.  i can go over and place a lay on the next favourite at warwick farm, no surprise to see £108 laying it one tick higher.  or stick a back in and see £108 looking for one tick lower.  the bot never sleeps.

Do you?

You offered a bet on a market without other customers?

Good job you did Hulk. Show us full details of when the the bet was offered and taken.

There then will be a record of this bet and the £108 bet in the historical data.

the chances of me laying 1.41 on over 5.5 goals in a club friendly between St.Anna and UFC Fehring, and then a cohort of betfarians all immediately putting bets in at 1.42, which "just happens" to total £108 .... is nil.  which is unfortunate for paudy, guess he chose the wrong account for treatment.  because you all now know what he's up to.  you're welcome.

totally irrelevant crap as usual.

Your 1.41 bet got matched which obviously means the £108 at 1.42 must have been matched.

It will all show up on the historical data.

Obviously if there is no £108 at 1.42 it will obviously point to you telling porkies again.


Any more of your stalling tactics will not work.

Easy enough to find in your betting profit and loss.

Three Card Brag
    110     100.00     100.00     Back     11-Apr-26 15:13     11-Apr-26 15:31     -100.00




you can see that it shows placed and matched times.

Please supply a PHOTO of your football bet.

That nonsense has nothing to do with my post.

I was offering you a chance to provide information to find proof of this £108 bet being matched at 1.42.

I thought you would jump at the chance if you were telling the truth.

If you were lying you would just use pathetic stalling tactics.

I didn't need your help Hulk on such a quiet market.

Only gave you the impression that your help was needed just to get your reaction.


Well I've downloaded the data and to no ones surprise your £108 at 1.42 was a pack of lies.

who would have thought it ?

I don't think hulk intended placing bets, he was just gap filling. I think he's only just discovered bots and over-rounds are active on this site.