can't see how they can change the result. Largy go looked to be on top before the interference so therefore no evidence the interference improved its placing.
can't see how they can change the result. Largy go looked to be on top before the interference so therefore no evidence the interference improved its placing.
I know the winner was clear at the line, so it should be, having nearly knocked the runner up through the rails. I believe that the winning distance should be considered immaterial. At speed, any interference exaggerates the winning distance.
I know the winner was clear at the line, so it should be, having nearly knocked the runner up through the rails. I believe that the winning distance should be considered immaterial. At speed, any interference exaggerates the winning distance.