We want to share an important update with our Betfair Community users.
Over the coming months, the Betfair Community platform will be winding down. The final active day for the platform will be December 21st. From December 22nd, users will no longer be able to access the platform.
Your discussions, insights, engagement, and, most importantly, feedback have helped shape the platform and guided innovation. Your feedback continues to be important to us, and we will continue to listen via our dedicated feedback channels, as well as through product testing and innovations.
To share your feedback and experience, visit: https://support.betfair.com/app/home
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 83 comments are related to the topic:
Stewards
Stewards
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 83
|
By:
When there was plenty in the Markets they tried it on years ago,beggars
|
|
By:
ok fair enough uptheirons.
Cider ur living in a different universe |
|
By:
Are you unaware of the the delay on the result being known to BF,Cider?
Not that I would ever expect you to admit you were ever wrong  |
|
By:
Exactly what have I stated on the tread that you consider is wrong ?
|
|
By:
I rest my case
|
|
By:
So do I. Are you trailing our great PM ? Just answer the question.
|
|
By:
I wasn't paying attention to that race or the afters until it was nearly all done....but when i saw 'result stands' pop up on RTV the market was still open on my screen and I saw the sweep. I then only saw the scout camera and it appeared to me both horses , in fact all the horses , were migrating slightly across the track under their own steam, so it looked like a result stands to me.
|
|
By:
watch david lovells interview with simon nott. That will give you a pretty good idea Cider
|
|
By:
Betfair cant manage all there markets, also its nearly impossible from a latency perspective to find out exactly when the result is known. Betfair in the most don't even bother
|
|
By:
I don't need to watch any interview. I'm telling you that's what used to happen. Sweepers risked a ban, and some did. Betfair didn't rely on the suspend monkey, I believe they used the published time stamp by the BHA.
|
|
By:
Or even care,beggars.
Anybody leaving money up in Stewards better have a very strong view or be prepared to be "hoovered" |
|
By:
What I don't know is when they stopped reversing sweeps after the result (if indeed they have)
|
|
By:
Cider you still need education it seems when it comes to betfair.. or gambling as a hole bf
|
|
By:
lol
|
|
By:
had plenty of bets cancelled in the past....annoyingly... but absolutely correctly.
|
|
By:
Not so nowdays,swifty
|
|
By:
ye, not now irons, plenty of sweeping in US races when they forget to suspend
|
|
By:
we know need to focus on betting the 1 pounds in the final 3 furlongs here
# |
|
By:
is it fair that if i'd had say £100 asking for 1.8 the 2ptp to get the race i would have only been matched after the result was known ?
|
|
By:
No
|
|
By:
Doesn’t suit scrapiron trying to look sensible,once a bell always a bell….
|
|
By:
Yet another insightful post from Thrush who doesn't ever bet I/R
|
|
By:
Perhaps it would be best to leave it to people who have knowledge of the subject which excludes Thrush
|
|
By:
An enquiry was held to consider the placings in this race after interference during the closing stages, involving the winner, KING’S CRUISER, ridden by Marco Ghiani and TAKE THE BOAT (IRE), placed second, ridden by Harry Vigors. Being a 7lb claimer, Vigors was accompanied in the enquiry by a senior rider. The Stewards considered that the interference had not improved KING’S CRUISER’s placing as despite hanging right-handed, regardless of its rider’s best efforts, and taking TAKE THE BOAT (IRE) off its intended line, little momentum was lost with the rider of TAKE THE BOAT (IRE) able to continue riding his mount forward, to be beaten by a short head. The interference was found to be accidental in that Ghiani was taking reasonable steps to prevent KING’S CRUISER from hanging left-handed.
UTTER PONY ^^^ |
|
By:
1.03 £751.24
1.04 £922.68 1.05 £3,651.67 1.06 £3,947.58 1.07 £5,621.05 1.08 £3,613.25 1.09 £2,024.32 1.1 £3,405.66 assuming that was all done in photo? how ffs won 6" and wouldnt tell on drone its drifted.. winners forced 2nd 5-6yds right give it a nudge and won 6".. saving grace was 2nd never stopped riding but cud easily have been disq what was stewards betting? the market is swept normally by people at the track. |
|
By:
The second went as low as 1.4 in the Stewards but as the Inquiry continued drifted to 1.9 before the late swipe on the result.
It could have gone either way and I did not play |
|
By:
It could have gone either way
Thanks for clearing that up  |
|
By:
Merely stating the facts,Cider.
The Stewards there have previous convictions |
|
By:
Tomorrow is Friday, a fact that might be more enlightening than yours
 |
|
By:
A question was asked and I answered.
I did not say that I agreed with it. Sorry if that did not agree with your view,Cider (the man who never is wrong) |
|
By:
if ewe believe an inq could go either way and at 1.4 / 5/2 if you dont play ewe aint got an opinion.
|
|
By:
Not an opinion I would back at that Track after what has happened in the past there.
BTW,I am rarely an A/W player but watched the Head on where it looked fav to go |
|
By:
Judge iron still sitting on ri-coco the clown's lap into the early hours. How nice
. A proper pair of "chums". |
|
By:
His tea boy….
|
|
By:
The Fake LePRICKcorn and the ex petrol salesman shirtlifter having brekfast together...
question is..who is the giver? |
|
By:
had a closer look...
assuming that was all done in photo? how ffs won 6" and wouldnt tell on drone its drifted.. winners forced 2nd 5-6yds right.. never quite touched and won 6".. saving grace was 2nd never stopped riding but cud easily have been disq what was stewards betting? the market is swept normally by people at the track. |
|
By:
A question was asked and I answered.
Exactly what question was that addressing? Still trailing our great PM it appears ;) |
|
By:
|
|
By:
The trading was normal, until the sweeps.
The photo betting was open for quite a while, but who had won it was clear cut. Would have been 1.01 no offers without risk of interference. So as is often the case, it was a pseudo market on a potential SE, not the actual photo outcome. |
|
By:
can barely notice it went 1-2yds right on rtv never mind 5-6.
|