|
By:
Bring back Tommo!
|
|
By:
Tough gig
|
|
By:
Being myopic has rarely been an advantage for a commentator
|
|
By:
Too busy slagging Trump on X
|
|
By:
That's good to hear..well done mike..
Trump is not all there..should in a care home in a bubble suit. Just speaks incoherent pish sentence after sentence. Good to hear the eu is going to sanction his craziness.... |
|
By:
The irony though of Cattermole of all people slagging someone off for waffling and not knowing what he's talking about
|
|
By:
Cattermole has one claim to fame that he gets kudos for
He rode a very big name Hollywood actress at Sandown one day, Eclipse I think |
|
By:
He does a good "Sean Connery" as well
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
People genuinely thinking the EU can take on Trump, alone makes it worth it having him around
![]() |
|
By:
Who’s taking him on ?
|
|
By:
afaik, nobody.
|
|
By:
Lots of the usual suspects getting excited about the prospect of it. Meanwhile they are happy for 'us' to bend over for Xi.
|
|
By:
Rubbish
Trump is crackers and a menace to europe but a friend to Putin. for that alone he can drop deed but you are a Putin fanboy Bidet was a calamity and it showed the arrogance of the chattering classes that and phony liberal meeja that they didnt go near it, so biased are they and full of loathing for Trump Hes a nut but not wrong on every score, particularly europe getting US defence for nothing |
|
By:
We can't do anything about Putin and he is never going to go into a hot war with the UK. Fanboy? absolutely not. I'm not a fantasist either that believes Putin will stop because we tell him to.
Obviously Trump is not crackets but he is a rather effective troll. |
|
By:
He keeps doing it and the suckers keep sucking. One would have thought they would have learned by now, however it's like a cat playing with a mouse.
|
|
By:
tripe
'we' could have done something about Putin, but didnt in 2014, when the invasion began. you miss the point. even his most strident critics dont suggest he is interested in war with the Uk but they arent seeing the bigger picture he says he is liberating Ukraine from nazis on Putin TV, the only channel, which is clearly not true If the war is about that , then why is he engaging in cyberwar, sabotage, cable-cutting(caught red-handed), spreading disinformation and inteferring in foreign elections, and spreading the most filthy propaganda from the St Petersburg IRA? That is suggestive of a further purpose, otherwise why antagonise your neighbours in such a way that Finland and Lithuania are planting tens of thousands of land mines along the border? Sweden and Finland ressited NATO for 70 years, now they are mad keen for it. Why? At what point is the Uk involved if he gets what he wants? As much as he can is the answer, and if he can detach the U.S. from Erurope he might get a big bonus courtesy of those who refuse to see the evidence that has been accumulating over the 26 years he has been in power |
|
By:
Trump or Starmer ?
|
|
By:
IC E, Ga za, Ukra ine, Green land, Vene zuela, tariffs, Dav ros, etc, ...
Day in, day out, the masses are being pummeled with coverage of the 'father of the va x'. Whatever the subject, conflict or country, he's at the centre of it. It's almost as if it's some sort of psy-op. Has any US president ever been given so much coverage in a foreign country? So here's what my analysis is, we have a prime minister who openly admits his allegiances lie with Davos and not Westminster, and from that I would conclude he's very much in favour of a one world government. Regime change in Russia and Iran would bring that one step closer. |
|
By:
I genuinely have no idea what you are on about, fool. Our military 'force' would struggle to fill a single large football stadium. And the ones we have are not exactly a fighting force. There's nothing the UK could have dome about Crimea. There's nothing we should have done about it. It's not politically correct, I don't particularly care about Ukraine.
'We' seem to live in a bizarre world where 'we' think we can stop wars/invasions. If the EU want to do something about Russia, let them. Do you think they would come to our rescue if it was a cost to them ![]() As I touched on, in the meantime we let China do whatever they want. Including taking over Hong Kong. Why wasn't the country vexed about that? We pay £billions to give our territory away. At the same time are gas lit into believing certain conflicts around the world are somehow our responsibility. Including another country's foreign territory. You couldn't make it up. At the same we willingly collect illegal invaders from the channel, ply them with goodies and let them free to roam the country unabated. That's the ones who aren't hanging around for their free new builds. |
|
By:
I was a bit young at the time to remember, can someone a bit older than I remind us what action other european nations and Southern Ireland took when Argentina invaded the Falklands?
|
|
By:
the meeja is obsessed with US politics, as I have bored on about many times, ie the death of a violent thug leads to riots and statue toppling here, but nowhere else. why?
partly because it always looks to blame the west, and US and Israel in particular for the worlds problems and the rest of the world is a victim, however nasty, like Iran, until they cannot ignore it like now Its not a psy-op, a term only used by conspiracy nutters Kia has not said his allegiance is with Davos. And you jump to some wacky conclusions, with no evidence and one world government is another giveaway term. So when govts. change the new imcumbents adopt the same agenda automatically, everywhere and unquestioning? A big conspiracy Are you suggesting the opposition to Putin is based on the desire to create a new world order, and not an entirely reasonable response to a brutal mass-murdering dictator returning war to europe by engaging in the conquest of a friendly neighbour? regime change in Iran appears to have emanated from within, by people who have endured the most terrible oppression since the Islamic revolution produced the most vicious regime in the world, in a hot contest. no you say, its all part of the plan embarrassing garbage. get off loonytube you nut |
|
By:
I like him
|
|
By:
Cider doesnt care about Ukraine. Crimea, btw was annexed, the war itself was in eastern Ukraine in 2014
you could voice some disapproval of a dictator invading his neighbour. but you dont Nowhere did I say troops shold be sent. If Putin hasd been frozen out in 2014 (or 2008 when he invaded Georgia, as the Baltic states suggested, as they knew Ukraine was next) this probably wouldnt have happened Putin wants to fragemnt europe, hence his relentless grey zone attacks on it. Why else does he do this? A point you ignore At what stage should we become bothered? Putin will annexe Belarus, then probably Georgia and Moldova, and if he gets away with that, and if he lives long enough, the Baltic states Why have those horrible scandis become so militaristic all of a sudden? They want to disrupt their ordered affluent societies to antagonise Putin? Or because they recognise a far bigger problem in future if the dictator is not given enough reason to pause and maybe back off? Appeasing dictaors does not work in anyones favour, regardless if you are not directly affected. You might be when he cuts your cables, and he has a large 'dark fleet' sneaking around that are prbably practising it now And you change the subject. I have bored on about China also, leave it out |
|
By:
Next to none that was ever given out Cider. As I recall the U.S. wasn’t that encouraging either however may well have aided quietly behind the scenes. It came out later that Pinochet, the erstwhile dictator and tyrant of Chile gave Thatcher assistance, again quietly. Which was why Thatcher was friendly towards him ( taking huge flak from the pre-woke wet brigade of Labour voters ) afterwards.
Those are my recalls. I think they are accurate. |
|
By:
Its not a psy-op, a term only used by conspiracy nutters
You must be absolutely thick as pigsh*t to think that. During the so-called covid era, SPI-B and Susan Michie, director of The Centre for Behaviour Change, were advising SAGE and the govt on how to influence public behaviour. Kia has not said his allegiance is with Davos It's here... https://x.com/BGatesIsaPyscho/status/1793544149821481096 And you jump to some wacky conclusions, with no evidence and one world government is another giveaway term. So when govts. change the new imcumbents adopt the same agenda automatically, everywhere and unquestioning? A big conspiracy Any number of supposedly independent nations moved in lockstep during the covid, with many of their 'leaders' even adopting the same "build back better" slogan, it was as though they were all reading from the same script. What policies have changed since one half of the uniparty took over from the other? Are you suggesting the opposition to Putin is based on the desire to create a new world order, and not an entirely reasonable response to a brutal mass-murdering dictator returning war to europe by engaging in the conquest of a friendly neighbour? regime change in Iran appears to have emanated from within, by people who have endured the most terrible oppression since the Islamic revolution produced the most vicious regime in the world, in a hot contest. no you say, its all part of the plan So why haven't they done anything about what's going on in Ga za? Why are they 'pals' with the Saudi and UAE regimes? Give ya head a shake and see if you can answer those questions. |
|
By:
The Falklands was an example of a brutal fascist dictatorship invading a harmless territory for its own ends, with no care for those being invaded at all
Sounds familiar I think we had to resist a blatant act of aggression and should have been given more support, and I still think that now Pinochet is the only dictator that allowed free elections, which he lost, and then accepted the result and relinquished power, something the raving leftists who hated him did not expect of far worse dictators on the left who never did and those same haters didnt givash1t Socialist tyrants dont count |
|
By:
not believing in something without evidence of it is not being thick. covid is an obsession of yours and goes nowhere to support your wacky stuff about 'world goverment' which must, by defintion, have a fabulous numnber of supporters
you harvest whatever you can to support what you want to believe, like all nutters, without contemplating how unlikely your hypothesis is. you dont question anything that aligns with your childish nonsense because 'they' havent stopped Gaza isnt evidence of a sinister conspiracy. 'they' are very busy. And what should have been done? Tell us why 'they' (its them again) are pals with Saudi The world is a complex mess, partly due to the refusal of the free world, ie west, which, oddly includes very eastern Aus and NZ to acknowledge that a huge chunk of it is a disaster and is not attuned to western notions of freedom, a woolly term but it will do for now Instead of pretending every people and nation and culture is equally valid and worthy of respect, which they are patently not, we should tell the really bad hats (China, Russia, all Islamic states) to get lost and refuse to let them undermine our economies and flood us with illegal migrants thats woefully simplistic but ive wasted enough time and need the khazi, and another bottle |
|
By:
The irony here is that when you actually experienced first-hand a form of tyranny in your own country eg education destroyed, businesses sent to the wall, basic civil liberties trampled on, told to cover your face in public, and coerced into taking a jab that is now known to have killed and damaged people, it passed you by, but somehow you feel 'qualified' to comment on other countries that you have no first-hand experience of?
|
|
By:
It's an absolute joke that people don't believe the EU hates us. Shortage of evidence I guess, notwithstanding the gateway laid on for the foreign invaders.
Perhaps it's because plenty of people with a British passport hate Britain, too. |
|
By:
i havent any 'first hand' experience of the south pole, but i do believe it is a bit chilly
it didnt pass me by. ive always been of the opinion that the lockdown was questionable in its severity and still do not know how bad or good it was. and dont put 'qualified' in qutoes because i didnt say it. you did and then attack me for something you said but it didnt lead me to believe in a 'one world ' government because theres simply no evidence for it |
|
By:
Actually, never mind passport, nominally working for the British State (whilst acting against it)
|
|
By:
Like who dreams up the idea of giving China the royal mint building to occupy. Not an accident is it. ffs.
|
|
By:
Busyfool 21 Jan 26 23:56
i havent any 'first hand' experience of the south pole, but i do believe it is a bit chilly But do you believe it's being affected by climate change? Your answer to that is probably "yes", but as you have no first-hand knowledge of that region, like all of your geopolitical pontificating and diatribe, you're entirely dependent on 'sources' for your replies. |
|
By:
who mentioned the EU hating us? must have missed it
'shortage of evidence' is usually because there isnt any You change the subject and dont fancy Putin any more I accept your capitulation |
|
By:
Starmer is humiliating himself, effectively batting for the EU over Greenland. But like that cricketer who walked out to the crease with no bat.
None of these countries give a flying fig about us, and as I say, actively hate us. It's not even like they try to hide it. |
|
By:
Madtolo, you may pooh pooh my one world government theory, but how about the memoirs of the late David Rockefeller?
“For more than a century, ideological extremists, at either end of the political spectrum, have seized upon well-publicized incidents, such as my encounter with Castro, to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal, working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists,' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it. “We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years......It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supernational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries.” ― David Rockefeller, Memoirs |
|
By:
Yes gb I do belive it is
my source is new scientist magazine, and i have a bundle of back copies of it, so test me if you dont belive it my geopolitical pontificating is based on evidence, not loonytube, not Putin propaganda Putin is a dictator he invaded neighbour he said in his own 5000 word testament that it was his 'historic mission' to reunite ukraine with russia he has crushed all debate and has murdered anyone who doesnt like it he uses state power for his own ends, and is fabulously wealthy he engages in cyberwar sabotage disinformation and assassination to furhter his aims (thats not proven, but do you doubt it?) 100s of thousands of russians have fled the country opposition is a criminal offence it is a closed media, only state tv exists. all independent media has been purged i have many sources, like a yard of books on the subject. and the testimony of a long line of russian dissidents who live in fear and the words of his neighbours, who all fear and hate him. sweden norway finland, poland, the baltic states, etc, on and on what are your 'sources'? |
|
By:
and you make a leap from one mans opinion to what you want to believe
its an opinion and not a fact. but you approve, so it goes in your plus file |