|
By:
Agree, Donegal, posted on the other thread
Being cynical,no refunds to be issued now if that's the case, but I supposed they are trying their best to get the meeting on Must have one eye on not chewing up the ground for the Xmas and new year meetings |
|
By:
its heavy but raceable imo
|
|
By:
some horses been waiting for these conditions all year been v little heavy ground this year
|
|
By:
Reg
Generally speaking racecourses give the paying public vouchers for a future fixture if they call it of after just a few races |
|
By:
WonderSB I agree with you. Wasn't suggesting they should, just that they would. However, like most of my predictions on horse racing this dreadful punting year, I got that wrong too!
|
|
By:
It will be worse next year as bookies need to get more money back now with government rules.
|
|
By:
fair enough dp
|
|
By:
Yes,jimnast
The rule used to be money back if no racing,or vouchers for future meetings if at least one race...the second option obviously preferable to the racecourse Fair play to Exeter for keeping going As wonders says...heavy but raceable |
|
By:
wd don & reg.
fckn clooless. |
|
By:
Thanks for your clever input, Rico
Pre event opinions always welcome, btw |
|
By:
Thanks for your clever input, Rico
Pre event opinions always welcome, btw |
|
By:
I should no better than to reply to such a stupid post but how can the bookies control the weather abba ?
|
|
By:
![]() |
|
By:
That chase looked brutal
![]() |
|
By:
2 finishes. That was not a good look for racing.
|
|
By:
Charming for those who have gone high on winning distances
|
|
By:
nope, even though I won I didn't really enjoy that
|
|
By:
They should probably call it a day now
|
|
By:
That should be enough really...
|
|
By:
That was some effort from me place laying the 2 finishers
Thats good going |
|
By:
Is Mike Cattermole the worst commentator ever? You could see the other horse coming to the second last when he said everything else had pulled up.
|
|
By:
Wont be much better at Ascot tomorrow. Plenty of water around. Swinley bottomless! Was at this meeting in the 90s. First race, couldnt see a thing because of fog. They ran the 2nd race in even worse conditions so they didnt have to make any refunds
|
|
By:
Saying "delayed" for next race on exchange now?
|
|
By:
Gambas...that practice by the tracks was what I was alluding to earlier
|
|
By:
Jockeys walking the track reg
|
|
By:
ABANDONED !
|
|
By:
Racing abandoned.
|
|
By:
Cheers, jimnast
|
|
By:
It’s what they use to do running a couple of races so no refunds I don’t think that happens anymore.
|
|
By:
Off
|
|
By:
Finitooooo
|
|
By:
wd don & reg.
|
|
By:
Of course, Rico will be straight on to apologise to myself and Donegal
|
|
By:
Cheers Rico
|
|
By:
Ruk pundits we’ve had a great days racing ,really ?
|
|
By:
not a good idea giving the mare her first run over fences in those conditions
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
🥸
|
|
By:
2 races on that hurdle course 40s & 49s above std that's not unraceable if jockeys ride sensibly but never mind
|