|
By:
I mean can you really see him running round Aintree.
![]() ![]() |
|
By:
Chasing?
There is more chance of me being a member of the Labour Party,Acey ![]() |
|
By:
Your not Tory shcum are you irons?
![]() |
|
By:
I hold most of the Parties in equal contempt,Acey.
All will promise anything to get their snouts in the trough and once in renege on them |
|
By:
Nothing exaggerating about it. Because it hasn’t been thought of before makes new, nothing else. The horse has proved itself a hazard on a jumping race-course. That is a fact. Jockeys need protection from such animals imo and I have thrown it out there for serious debate. That of course rules you out.
|
|
By:
I agree the Horse has turned into a liability....Should never be allowed to jump another obstacle imho....An absolute disaster waiting to happen.
|
|
By:
The Jockey Club should be stepping in and saying no more.
|
|
By:
Run him on The Flat by all means.
![]() |
|
By:
The Owner will make the final decision.
Oersonally,I hope that they don't risk it over Hurdles again but it is not my choice or the Forum's |
|
By:
Never mind the Owner like i said The Powers that be should be stepping in.
|
|
By:
Just like Horses that refuse to Race they dont get to many chances before they are banned from Racing.
|
|
By:
Very little if any chance of the BHA preventing the horse to run again.
Why worry about it ? |
|
By:
I think there is every chance.
|
|
By:
As the horse is now very much in the category of a somewhat fallen idol I wonder if they ultimately decide upon the usual route for such cases.
Not sure if the horse has the stomach for a Kangaroo's bo11ock but if his dexterity hasn't deserted him completely he may be able to carry off an American smooth or a Cha Cha Cha. |
|
By:
One of us knows what he is talking about,the other is you,Acey
![]() |
|
By:
Makes perfect sense to me.
![]() |
|
By:
Hulk thinks he moves BF Markets and it makes perfect sense to him
![]() |
|
By:
Nothing exaggerating about it. Because it hasn’t been thought of before makes new, nothing else. The horse has proved itself a hazard on a jumping race-course. That is a fact. Jockeys need protection from such animals imo and I have thrown it out there for serious debate. That of course rules you out.
Ban the horse merits discussion but change the jockey is ridiculous according to you, Honcho. Best of luck with that proposal. |
|
By:
Anyone remeber at horse called Beech Road, champion hurdle winner, went on to fall four times over fences and unseated three times, didnt stop him winning 7 chases though! Even Sea Pigeion fell three times. Then of course there is the famous horse 'Daisy' who in 1891 fell three times in one race and still won!!
|
|
By:
Yeah of course back in the dark old Days.
|
|
By:
Beech Road won the CH then started at 10/1 nto at Aintree on GN day and won easily
unbelievable price that was a good day! |
|
By:
Won quite easily as well NEC, so much for those who thought that his CH win was a fluke!
|
|
By:
suppose the extra trip and heavy ground played a part in the 10/1
but still could barely believe my eyes at the betting show |
|
By:
uptheirons 02 Dec 25 17:19
Very little if any chance of the BHA preventing the horse to run again. Why worry about it ? acey deucy 02 Dec 25 17:27 I think there is every chance. just shown yourself up for the absolute clueless clown you are...pmsl wac. |
|
By:
I didn’t say changing the jockey was ridiculous I have repeatedly said that blaming the jockey is. You don’t read too well. Nor have I made any proposal about the jockey, my proposal is about the horse, dopey. It should be disallowed entry to any future jumps race-course. There you are, I’ve repeated it just for you.
Got that 18.28 dopey? |
|
By:
LoyalHoncho 02 Dec 25 17:15
If it runs, falls and in so doing hurts a jockey? The NHA should demonstrate some bolls and insist the horse is a racing hazard and insist it is retired. beggars belief you'ce actually posted that absolute fckn nonsense. ![]() |
|
By:
Wtf are you babbling on about now?
You have proposed banning a horse because it falls. Moronic. Absolutely never in a million years would that become a rule of racing so you are wasting keystrokes with that idiocy. Tell me how outrageous is a "fictitious" word again Honcho. Your comporehension of the written word is terrible. I suggest you reread what I wrote. Thick as sh1t you are lad. ![]() |
|
By:
![]() ![]() |
|
By:
I posted a reply but its disappeared.
Laughing emojis is enough. |
|
By:
Because it hasn’t been thought of before makes new, nothing else.
No-one would be daft enough to think of that and then type it. Fook me Honch ![]() |
|
By:
Any way we'll agree to disagree Honch.
Good luck with banning the horse, and I'll hope for a jockey change. How would you price it up? It's a good job you thought of it cuz no-one else fecking would ![]() Adios. |
|
By:
Rico's lays of the day 5:15
Rico-Dangleflaps Rico-Dangleflaps04 Jul 24 17:07Joined: 07 Sep 18 | Topic/replies: 48,314 | Blogger: Rico-Dangleflaps's blog Lay (Bet Against) Backer's odds Backer's stake Payout Liability Searchingtheblues 110.00 £6.32 £688.88 Total stake: £6.32 i wont usher thissin in Mischief |