|
By:
How the **** can they do that. It's feckin disgraceful.... how much was slipped here huh?
|
|
By:
Looking at cctv haha
|
|
By:
Wouldn't be the first time the Clerk of Scales has got it wrong.
|
|
By:
could be beachy head
|
|
By:
if it's winner would that be a load done at 1.01 if DQ?
|
|
By:
must be a load done it was a photo
|
|
By:
James Owen. Trying to be a legit trainer. Things like this if it's true makes the outfit look ****
|
|
By:
SL not showing any amended result, yet...?
|
|
By:
still a stewards
|
|
By:
BHA says winner stands. 4th DQ.
|
|
By:
BHA Stewards
@BHAStewards · 20m Objection from Scales @WolvesRaces in race 4, 6:00pm to the winner VON KROLOCK and fourth placed horse SECRET ROAD (IRE). |
|
By:
BHA Stewards
@BHAStewards · 50s The result of race 4, 6:00pm @WolvesRaces First – VON KROLOCK, Second – BANDELLO, Third – SCENARIO, Fourth – I CAN IMAGINE (IRE). |
|
By:
what in the name of **** is going on
|
|
By:
crikey never dull is it
|
|
By:
they only have to look at the CCTV in the weighing room to confirm whether they weighed in or not.
|
|
By:
A multi billion pound industry.
An utter shambles(once more). |
|
By:
odd to object to both, but only DQ one....
|
|
By:
ATR more interested in interviewing fin about his wedding & the fkin dancing rather than getting a steward out there ffs
|
|
By:
fkin sh1tapes
|
|
By:
All a bit odd
|
|
By:
bit of a coincidence there was such a large amount laying the winner at 1.01 in the photo
|
|
By:
but possibly down to the 101 on the second past the post
|
|
By:
Don't worry lads. The CoS objection against the winner never happened, the whole thing was a figment of our imagination.
The Clerk of the Scales objected to, SECRET ROAD (IRE), placed fourth, ridden by Jack Mitchell on the grounds of the rider failing to weigh in. SECRET ROAD (IRE) was disqualified and the placings revised as follows: First – VON KROLOCK, Second – BANDELLO, Third – SCENARIO, Fourth – I CAN IMAGINE (IRE). After being interviewed, the rider was suspended for 3 days and was not entitled to a riding fee. |
|
By:
they press a button on a computer to confirm that a jockey has weighed in
sticky keys.. |
|
By:
The Clerk of the Scales objected to, SECRET ROAD (IRE), placed fourth, ridden by Jack Mitchell on the grounds of the rider failing to weigh in. After being interviewed, the rider was suspended for 3 days and was not entitled to a riding fee.
should be a licence suspension |
|
By:
eye conquer...no deterrent wotsoever.
|
|
By:
Now added:
The Clerk of the Scales objected to the winner, VON KROLOCK (IRE), ridden by Harry Davies on the grounds of the rider failing to weigh in. The Clerk of the Scales, Harry Davies, and trainer Michael Blake, who was a witness to events, were all interviewed. Having heard the evidence of all parties present, the Stewards were satisfied that Davies had presented himself to be weighed with all his equipment, but the weight had not been recorded and therefore were satisfied the correct weight had been carried throughout the race and confirmed the placing of VON KROLOCK (IRE). The Stewards ordered a report to forwarded to the Head Office of the British Horseracing Authority. |
|
By:
If the weight wasn't recorded how do the know what he weighed in at or am I missing something
|
|
By:
how can the weight not be recorded in that Im guessing that is the only job to be done at that point.
Maybe the suspend monkey on the photos is doing a bit of work experience at Dunstall Park ?? |
|
By:
Sounds like complete BS all round this race and weigh ins.
I think chucking out a 'winner' was a bigger deal than chucking the 4th placed one, so guess what happened.... |
|
By:
![]() |