There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
22 Oct 25
15:37
Joined:
Date Joined:
07 Sep 18
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 47
|
By:
cant see nowt side on..
|
|
By:
didnt see the head on, whats occuring?
|
|
By:
Didn't seem anything from side, but market seems think it's in danger!
|
|
By:
Slight bump. Winner was already getting back up.
|
|
By:
in danger Rico ?
|
|
By:
For me the 2nd came across slightly and was intimidating the winner. Then the winner did come slightly off its line and bumped the 2nd as it was going past it. It really should stand but with the small margin involved and a bump there is a chance it goes. 1/3 is fair in the stewards though as clearly the best horse won.
|
|
By:
25k at 1.01 matched so someone has a nice enough trade
|
|
By:
winner comes off 1 lane & gives the 2nd a slight bump late on
head dist prob keep but got a gimme 2/5 ish feels fair |
|
By:
not a gimme
|
|
By:
martins comments took it to 1.4
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
better not go, I redded out my lay of the favourite after thinking I'd lost, but only got around 1.1
  |
|
By:
I would not contemplate backing the fav at 1.26
|
|
By:
cudnt see anything from the 2 side views...my opinion is the 2nd has went 1/2L up going into the last fur but winner has battled back to nudge ahead whilst sl bumping 2nd 50yds out..has it cost the 2nd the race? not imo but as its bumped it and won 6" its no bet.
|
|
By:
1.34 now settled to right price imo
|
|
By:
agree winner was getting back up before the bump
|
|
By:
1.01 £25,445.25
1.02 £700.07 1.03 £1,507.78 1.04 £1,431.97 1.05 £753.77 1.06 £3,190.96 |
|
By:
A clear bump by the fav on the head on
|
|
By:
1.45 now....
|
|
By:
revised
|
|
By:
revised
|
|
By:
surprising but not unreasonable
|
|
By:
hoover got the lot before suspend
obviously will be chucked now |
|
By:
Yep, 1.01.
|
|
By:
poor decision for me. Anyone who understands racing knows that the first past the post was getting back up regardless of the bump. And also no doubt the 2nd came over first. But that's why you have to be careful betting on stewards with small margins.
|
|
By:
Lol
|
|
By:
redded out at 1.1, typical - others more blatant and they won't revise I'm sure...
|
|
By:
First past the post was already getting up, second didn't stay well enough. If that's the standard now, everything must go that touches from now on. (Obviously it will continue to be a lottery)
|
|
By:
Another dubious stewards decision
|
|
By:
Are you still at thornby,andyl?
|
|
By:
No pal shut donkeys years ago
|
|
By:
Only 1 left I believe
Stewards correct and it should happen more often. If there is doubt then the blameless one should be given the benefit of it |
|
By:
Could be argued that the runner up was closing again a touch by the line. I don't feel the second would have won without the interference, personally.
|
|
By:
strange 25k being laid in the foto as if anything looked like 2nd was edging right going into last fur..cudnt see the the bmp at all on both side on views.
|
|
By:
nope, I was quite tempted by the 1.07 in the long wait for rtv to show the head on. if anything it looked like the winner was interfered with, side on. but a case of too good to be true, someone in the market had seen it before rtv showed it
|
|
By:
looked back at this and it looks like a sub 1 second bet on the fptp at 1.01 when it reopeend for photo betting before again reopening for the enquiry
who could do that? |
|
By:
was no reason wotsoever to lay winner in foto..unless bet it and were greening.
|
|
By:
Boosted the placepot nicely.
£235.50. |
|
By:
https://x.com/MCYeeehaaa/status/1981019277369934220
Looked very harsh to me on head on |