Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 87 comments are related to the topic:
Prince Andrew....

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 2 of 3  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 87
By:
saddo
When: 22 Oct 25 10:20
ace, lots of them going through the courts in Rochdale,
recently and currently. Not just Yorkshire, nation wide
apart from London, according to Khan.
By:
impossible123
When: 22 Oct 25 10:29
The statement put out by the Home Sec Ms Mahmood is refreshing, and I hope she means it too. I also hope Ms Mahmood gets to appointing a judge who's not tainted by the industrial sexual abuse of vulnerable young white females (yes white) by Pakistani minicab drivers and their relatives up North esp Oldham asap.

I think this despicable and abhorrent sexual crimes against vulnerable young white under the watchful eyes of some social services, its employees, police personnel, MPs, etc, is expanded to other parts of the country where there is a major population of Pakistani minicab drivers. Any officials found guilty for a dereliction of public duty


I do not think this scummy behaviour is UK North specific. And, any public officials found guilty of a dereliction of duty must be held accountable. If having found guilty in court a custodial sentence or financial penalty should be imposed as their inactions have caused prolonged and unnecessary sufferings to the vulnerable young females by the Pakistani minicab drivers and some of their relatives.
By:
formoftheace
When: 22 Oct 25 11:41
Can is a sinister individual imv…..

The country is drowning in dirt…..

Imagine any young girl losing her you know what to a beast,ruined for life in most cases….

Fkn hideous any government would allow this….

I think a lot of individuals in so called high places are p@rvs anyway…..
By:
formoftheace
When: 22 Oct 25 11:44
Pity any young girl with the proper upbringing wanting to keep herself for her husband on her wedding night…

Spoiled by these sub human …better not type the rest tbh.
By:
LoyalHoncho
When: 22 Oct 25 11:45
With you there GC.  Always the possibility many are creative to suit agendas.
By:
elise
When: 22 Oct 25 11:54
my problem with all of this is why hasn't he been totally distanced, kicked out of royal lodge and completely cut off?  makes you wonder if charles is protecting him for some reason
By:
saddo
When: 22 Oct 25 12:01
I suspect Charlie quite detests him, elise, the firm comes first. I don't think they
can kick him out, the lease has a good few years left. If they did he'll likely be
after the refurb money back.
Charles is on the wane, the son may be more forceful.
By:
elise
When: 22 Oct 25 12:08
half expect him to abdicate (ill health or similar) and then andrew is dead in the water, but i was thinking more that charles has a secret and andrew is being kept onside
By:
LoyalHoncho
When: 22 Oct 25 12:10
Another post removed into the infinite ether of moderation, never to be seen again.  Perfectly reasonable too.
Do we have to create a new language to get posts published ?
By:
elise
When: 22 Oct 25 12:12
never saw what you wrote but don't repeat it as you'll prob get a holiday
By:
LoyalHoncho
When: 22 Oct 25 12:15
I used the word which Churchill used about the Germans.  I also referenced Edward viii and the current Royal of the year and made a reasoned comment.
By:
saddo
When: 22 Oct 25 12:15
It seems to be a new thing, bans on words like rape and murder are
imposed on some youtube podcasters. They have to say 'undead'
instead of killed, for example.
By:
LoyalHoncho
When: 22 Oct 25 12:16
Which was, find a synecure for him abroad but WHO would take him?
By:
ponchoslament
When: 22 Oct 25 12:16
Well they have probably worked out, you are
A sycophantic n ob, with It seems, an opinion on absolutely
Everything, of which you know very little ??

As this is a racing forum, do you actually know anything about racing ??
By:
saddo
When: 22 Oct 25 12:17
Apologies, they have to say 'unalived'.
By:
LoyalHoncho
When: 22 Oct 25 12:24
No, nothing at all.  Thank you again for your very valuable contribution to the thread.  We value your inestimable wisdom at all times.
By:
ponchoslament
When: 22 Oct 25 12:32
Yeah, wisdom is invisible to a man that has none
By:
LoyalHoncho
When: 22 Oct 25 12:33
Thank you again.
By:
ponchoslament
When: 22 Oct 25 12:40
You just can’t help yourself, can you ?
You’re a last word freak
By:
ponchoslament
When: 22 Oct 25 12:56
I don’t normally comment on non racing related content
It becomes an exercise in futility, but.

It must be remembered Andrew has committed no crime here, nor
Was he ever charged. Hé has been convicted through the media, and
Vox pop. Weather these deeds ever occurred, we will most probably
Never now. But it seems the vast majority of the media, politicians,
And general public, believe everything, essentially, a hooker has said ??

I have no affection, sympathy, or any empathy for Prince Andrew,
Hé seems to be, a generally unlikeable individual, and some of
The photos taken of him, with his distainful glare, doesn’t help with
His image either.

And let’s not pretend all these victimised girls, thst travelled
To his Island on his private jet, were thst naive, to think they were
For any other reason, other than physical pleasure. They knew
Absolutely everything, hookers. But it this new retrospective
World we now live it. Today’s society seems tgem as victims

They all knew what they were doin, all of them
By:
A_T
When: 22 Oct 25 14:42
They all knew what they were doin, all of them

what about the ones who were children?
By:
ponchoslament
When: 22 Oct 25 14:57
As far as i know they were all above thé legal
Age of consent ?? Unless you know different

This case is absolutely insignificant, when you
Compare it to what the Filthy Pakistani men did to so many
Underage girls, who were in the care system.

And were completely let down by politicians, police, and justice
System. What happened to those poor girl, was absolutely sub human

Andrew may or may not of get together with girl, who was no shrinking violet
Was aware what was happening, and travelled all over the world, with Epstein
And got 12 million for her consent ???
By:
A_T
When: 22 Oct 25 16:14
seems strange he would need to pay her off if he'd done nothing illegal
By:
impossible123
When: 22 Oct 25 16:31
He socialised with and fawned about a paedophile. Could he be considered or classed as a paedophile too? Does guilt by association or collusion apply here?
By:
formoftheace
When: 22 Oct 25 16:36
When you look at Fergie in her hay day,he married her ffs…..she couldn’t stir me in a million tbh…..
By:
roggrain
When: 22 Oct 25 17:09
Headline news for those who have nothing better to do than read the gossip columns. For myself I couldn't give

a tinker's cuss!
By:
1st time poster
When: 22 Oct 25 17:14
so if they were all above age of consent
why was EPSTIEN a convicted peado ?
and whys maxwell in jail  ?
By:
impossible123
When: 22 Oct 25 17:36
I do not read the papers for this trash. However, what's been reported on tv eg a peppercorn rent; never paid a water bill; living in a mansion with 27 rooms (I think, why so many?); etc.

Why could he not live according to his means? Most people do in UK Plc.
By:
ponchoslament
When: 22 Oct 25 17:42
At-t hé had to pay, hé had no choice, once she got case accepted and listed
Théy couldn’t have a member of the royale family, thé Duke of yours, on trial
In an American court, to be cross examined by Roth weiler types of
American attorneys ?? He’d of been a laughing stock, even if he won, he’d lost
Théy of course knew this

Hé was in a no win position, hé had to pay ??
By:
impossible123
When: 22 Oct 25 17:50
Any sympathy for him? I doubt it very much. His family has been carrying him entirely almost since birth. And, he's still milking it. He ought to be in a bunker or live a life as a recluse here or elsewhere.
By:
penzance
When: 22 Oct 25 17:52
Hands out £12M all the time.
By:
elise
When: 22 Oct 25 17:56
did i read rightly that it wasn't his money but the queen in fact bailed him out?
By:
ponchoslament
When: 22 Oct 25 18:00
Dont know, it don’t matter who paid, or what
She got, she got it, hé didn’t have to appear before
The entire worlds media, it would of been a catastrophe
By:
saddo
When: 22 Oct 25 18:00
I expect she had no choice, the firm was probably held to ransom by the miscreant.
By:
ponchoslament
When: 22 Oct 25 18:08
??? Saddo, emmmm, it took her a long time to bring the case??
By:
ponchoslament
When: 22 Oct 25 18:15
Oh thé firm, yeah, plus it’s was was a special occasion/
Yesr for the queen, this case woukd of over shadowed everything
The entire royal failing woukd of been dragged into the mire
A disaster every where théy looked, she got 12 million quid for
Effectively consensual …. ?
By:
elise
When: 22 Oct 25 18:17
so why did he deny knowing her if it was "effectively consensual?
By:
impossible123
When: 22 Oct 25 18:18
£12m, and she still took her own life. Poor woman.

The victims of the Pakistani grooming gangs in Oldham, Bradford, etc, got nothing. And, the present government and Sir Shameless even tried to silence them by denying them a national enquiry, initially. The present one has been mired with controversies and accusations of biasness.
By:
ponchoslament
When: 22 Oct 25 18:23
Jesus Elise, hé had too, thé scandal, Duke of York  ****ing an 18 yo
How could he possibly admit to tgst, it looks like he was the unlucky one,
As he had the highest public profile. The rest of them appear to have
Gotten away with it ??
By:
elise
When: 22 Oct 25 18:44
so he couldn't admit to a legal act, but pays her 12m to go away and claims he never met her, makes sense
Page 2 of 3  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com